Comparison of visible fluorescence properties between sol–gel derived Er3+–Yb3+ and Er3+–Y3+ co-doped TiO2 films
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Both Er3+–Yb3+ and Er3+–Y3+ co-doped TiO2 films were prepared on fused silica by sol–gel processes. The effect of doping concentration upon the up-conversion fluorescence of Yb3+–Er3+and Er3+–Y3+ co-doped TiO2 systems will be focused in this investigation. Although the influence of Yb3+ and Y3+ ions on the structural of Er3+–TiO2 host material is almost the same, different up-conversion emissions are observed. Both Er3+-doped and Er3+–Y3+ co-doped TiO2 films exhibit the up-conversion emission with green and red light. However, much stronger intensity of red light relative to green light is observed for the Er3+–Yb3+ co-doped TiO2 system. For Er3+ (5 mol%)–Y3+ co-doped TiO2 samples, the relative intensity ratio (IR/IG) rapidly decreases with the increase of Y3+ concentration above 10 mol%. On the contrary, the relative intensity ratio (IR/IG) increases with increasing Yb3+ concentration for Er3+ (5 mol%)–Yb3+ co-doped TiO2 samples. The up-conversion emission in the Er3+–Y3+ co-doped TiO2 system belongs to a two-photon absorption up-conversion process. However, the overall up-conversion efficiency in the Er3+–Yb3+ co-doped TiO2 system could be contributed from the complicated mechanisms.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials · Glass properties and applications · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Whitley · Electron. Lett. · 1991 · 27 · 178510.1049/el:19911110 ↗
2. Auzel · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1975 · 122 · 10110.1149/1.2134132 ↗
3. Snoeks · J. Opt. Soc. Am. B · 1997 · 12 · 146810.1364/JOSAB.12.001468 ↗
4. Blixt · IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. · 1991 · 2 · 3
5. Stone · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1996 · 197 · 13610.1016/0022-3093(95)00514-5 ↗
6. Nii · J. Lumin. · 1998 · 76–77 · 11610.1016/S0022-2313(97)00271-8 ↗
7. Amorim · J. Lumin. · 1998 · 78 · 27110.1016/S0022-2313(98)00002-7 ↗
8. Urlacher · J. Raman Spectrosc. · 1996 · 27 · 78510.1002/(SICI)1097-4555(199610)27:10<785::AID-JRS35>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
9. Bahtat · Opt. Commun. · 1994 · 111 · 5510.1016/0030-4018(94)90138-4 ↗
10. Bahtat · Thin Solid Films · 1998 · 323 · 5910.1016/S0040-6090(97)01027-4 ↗
11. Ting · J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 90 · 556410.1063/1.1413490 ↗
12. Obaton · Spectro. Acta A · 1999 · 55 · 26310.1016/S1386-1425(98)00192-9 ↗
13. Layne · Phys. Rev. B · 1997 · 16 · 1010.1103/PhysRevB.16.10 ↗
14. Mita · J. Appl. Phys. · 1999 · 85 · 416010.1063/1.370325 ↗
15. Ennen · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1983 · 43 · 94310.1063/1.94190 ↗
16. Ennen · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1985 · 46 · 38110.1063/1.95639 ↗
17. Bahtat · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1996 · 202 · 1610.1016/0022-3093(96)00172-X ↗
18. Subramanian · Prog. Solid St. Chem. · 1983 · 15 · 5510.1016/0079-6786(83)90001-8 ↗
19. Maurice · J. Opt. Soc. Am. B · 1996 · 13 · 69310.1364/JOSAB.13.000693 ↗
20. Jackel · Appl. Opt. · 1992 · 31 · 339010.1364/AO.31.003390 ↗
21. Jaba · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. · 2000 · 12 · 452310.1088/0953-8984/12/20/307 ↗
22. Tanabe · Phys. Rev. B · 1992 · 45 · 462010.1103/PhysRevB.45.4620 ↗
23. Floquet · Oxidation Met. · 1992 · 37 · 25310.1007/BF00665191 ↗
24. Hehlen · Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 50 · 1626410.1103/PhysRevB.50.16264 ↗
25. Goutaland · J. Alloys Compd. · 1998 · 275–277 · 27610.1016/S0925-8388(98)00326-0 ↗
26. Jaba · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. · 2000 · 12 · 4523