journal article·2025-09-09

Nanoscale Curvature-Facilitated Membrane Intercalation of Conjugated Oligoelectrolytes Revealed by Nanobar-Supported Lipid Bilayers

Sian Kang Chong, Xinwen Miao, Samuel J. W. Chan, Ji-Yu Zhu, Simou Sun, Yihang Liu, Xiangfu Guo, Zihui Fan, Yi Teng Lau, James C. S. Ho, Atul N. Parikh, Guillermo C. Bazan, Wenting Zhao

ACS Nano· Volume 19· Issue 35
Publisher page

Abstract

Conjugated oligoelectrolytes (COEs) constitute a powerful toolbox for detecting and modulating cell membrane properties. The versatility in their molecular structural design enables fine-tuning of their membrane intercalating behaviors, ranging from membrane disruption for antimicrobial applications to membrane stabilization for cell labeling and biosensing. However, a detailed description of the intercalation mechanism is absent, despite efforts to understand the impact of charge density and hydrophobic core length on the membrane intercalation efficiency of COEs. A critical yet overlooked factor is membrane curvature, which has been shown to modulate the spatiotemporal organization of molecules on cell membranes. Here, we found that nanoscale curved membranes serve as "hotspots" for COE intercalation. Using designed nanobar arrays with a gradient geometry, we generated nanobar-supported lipid bilayers with predefined membrane curvatures. Curvature-correlated spatial enrichment of COEs was observed on nanobars with curved ends of 600 nm diameter or below in a time-dependent manner. Higher membrane curvature corresponded to a faster COE intercalation rate and higher equilibrium capacity. Comparing COEs with different chemical structures, those with shorter hydrophobic cores and lower charge densities promoted more curvature-guided membrane intercalation. Membranes with increased surface charges or more lipid packing defects further reinforced the curvature preference of the COEs. These results indicate that membrane curvature plays a significant role in the spatiotemporal modulation of COE-membrane intercalation, forming strategies for tailored molecular designs to target cellular membranes of different shapes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior · Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials · RNA Interference and Gene Delivery

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology

Nanyang Technological University

Department of Chemistry

National University of Singapore

Institute for Functional Intelligent Materials

Institute for Digital Molecular Analytics and Science

Department of Chemistry, Stony Brook University, 100 Nicolls Road, Stony Brook, New York 11794, United States

School of Biological Sciences

Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Materials Science & Engineering

University of California

Funding

Air Force Research Laboratory · Ministry of Education - Singapore · Human Frontier Science Program

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/la403409t10.1021/la403409t ↗
2. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2023.10142910.1016/j.xcrp.2023.101429 ↗
3. 10.1021/ja101615610.1021/ja1016156 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20180802110.1002/adma.201808021 ↗
5. 10.1002/cssc.20150019410.1002/cssc.201500194 ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20180670110.1002/adma.201806701 ↗
7. 10.1021/am400220s10.1021/am400220s ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.8b1909810.1021/acsami.8b19098 ↗
9. 10.1002/chem.20220380310.1002/chem.202203803 ↗
10. 10.1039/D0SC03679J10.1039/D0SC03679J ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.1c1971610.1021/acsami.1c19716 ↗
12. 10.1039/C6SC00630B10.1039/C6SC00630B ↗
13. 10.1002/anie.20180310310.1002/anie.201803103 ↗
14. 10.1128/AEM.03355-1410.1128/AEM.03355-14 ↗
15. 10.1021/jacs.3c1053110.1021/jacs.3c10531 ↗
16. 10.1126/sciadv.ade299610.1126/sciadv.ade2996 ↗
17. 10.1002/jev2.1252010.1002/jev2.12520 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20220198910.1002/adma.202201989 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.12798110.1016/j.snb.2020.127981 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.03.01710.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.03.017 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.6b0427610.1021/acsami.6b04276 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b0042710.1021/acs.accounts.9b00427 ↗
23. 10.1039/C4CC06478J10.1039/C4CC06478J ↗
24. 10.1002/adfm.20200406810.1002/adfm.202004068 ↗
25. 10.1038/nature0439610.1038/nature04396 ↗
26. 10.1038/nchembio.194110.1038/nchembio.1941 ↗
27. 10.1242/jcs.11445410.1242/jcs.114454 ↗
28. 10.26508/lsa.20190034310.26508/lsa.201900343 ↗
29. 10.1038/nnano.2017.9810.1038/nnano.2017.98 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41556-024-01511-x10.1038/s41556-024-01511-x ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b0059410.1021/acs.accounts.7b00594 ↗
32. 10.1083/jcb.20010707510.1083/jcb.200107075 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.11.00510.1016/j.devcel.2005.11.005 ↗
34. 10.1083/jcb.20060917610.1083/jcb.200609176 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.09.07710.1016/j.cub.2004.09.077 ↗
36. 10.1038/sj.emboj.760117410.1038/sj.emboj.7601174 ↗
37. 10.1038/s41556-023-01238-110.1038/s41556-023-01238-1 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41467-024-52899-x10.1038/s41467-024-52899-x ↗
39. 10.1073/pnas.191016611610.1073/pnas.1910166116 ↗
40. 10.1038/s41467-022-35034-610.1038/s41467-022-35034-6 ↗
41. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.19910.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.199 ↗
42. 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)34423-010.1016/S0022-2275(20)34423-0 ↗
43. 10.1039/D2CS00014H10.1039/D2CS00014H ↗
44. 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.10.00910.1016/j.devcel.2012.10.009 ↗
45. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-052809-15512110.1146/annurev-biochem-052809-155121 ↗
46. 10.1529/biophysj.107.12807410.1529/biophysj.107.128074 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.tcb.2006.08.00910.1016/j.tcb.2006.08.009 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2004.06.01010.1016/j.bbamem.2004.06.010 ↗
49. 10.1073/pnas.16026069710.1073/pnas.160260697 ↗
50. 10.1021/bi010904c10.1021/bi010904c ↗
51. 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.11.383710.1016/j.bpj.2012.11.3837 ↗
52. 10.1021/la302205b10.1021/la302205b ↗
53. 10.1155/2011/36853510.1155/2011/368535 ↗
54. 10.1038/nnano.2015.8810.1038/nnano.2015.88 ↗
55. 10.1038/s41596-019-0161-710.1038/s41596-019-0161-7 ↗
56. 10.3791/6434010.3791/64340 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.isci.2020.10171210.1016/j.isci.2020.101712 ↗