journal article·2026-02-10

Discovery of High-Performance Ni 0.62 Fe 0.23 Ce 0.15 O Electrocatalyst for Oxygen Evolution Reaction via Active Machine Learning

Miaomiao Xue, Wenxuan Fan, Zaibin Xue, Xudong Xu, Zeyang Zhang, Xinyue Hu, Xiaoran Lu, Liming Wu, Mingkai Liu, Zijian Tian, Zhenyuan Teng, Qilun Wang, Yan Yan, Bin Liu

ACS Nano· Volume 20· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Heteroatom-doped transition metal oxides (H-TMOs) are regarded as a promising class of electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER). However, it is challenging and time-consuming to optimize the proper structure and elemental composition of H-TMOs. Herein, we develop an effective strategy that integrates a machine learning model with a genetic algorithm (GA) to forecast the overpotentials of NiO-based OER electrocatalysts with different heteroatom doping. Compared with other traditional machine learning and deep learning models, the Random Forest Regression (RFR) model exhibits the highest accuracy, achieving a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of only 4.73 mV on the test set. The prediction showed that the NiFeCeO electrocatalysts with mole fractions of Ce and Fe in the ranges of 0–0.25 and 0.15–0.65, respectively, exhibit lower overpotentials. Furthermore, the RFR predictions and GA optimization pinpointed Ni 0.62 Fe 0.23 Ce 0.15 O as the most promising OER electrocatalyst. Experimental validation shows that Ni 0.62 Fe 0.23 Ce 0.15 O exhibits an overpotential of 260 mV at a current density of 10 mA/cm 2, positioning it near the apex of the activity volcano plot. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations illustrate that Fe and Ce doping into NiO can effectively reduce/eliminate the bandgap of NiO, leading to greatly improved electronic conductivity and electron transfer kinetics. Notably, the OER energy barrier of NiFeCeO (1.63 eV) is lower as compared to that of NiCeO (1.87 eV), NiFeO (1.72 eV), and NiO (1.96 eV). This study established a synergistic strategy combining machine learning-guided screening, experimental validation, and mechanistic DFT analysis for the rational design of heteroatom-doped TMOs, offering a paradigm for accelerating catalyst discovery.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Machine Learning in Materials Science · CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Coal Clean Conversion and Low Carbon Utilization

Anhui University of Technology

School of Artificial Intelligence

China University of Mining and Technology

State Key Laboratory of New Textile Materials and Advanced Processing

Department of Materials Science and Engineering

City University of Hong Kong

Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Institute for Clean Energy (HKICE) & Center of Super Diamond and Advanced Films (COSDAF)

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China · Innovation and Technology Fund · City University of Hong Kong · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province · Anhui Provincial Educational Teaching Reform Project · JC STEM Lab of Advanced CO2 Upcycling, Chinese University of Hong Kong · State Key Laboratory of New Textile Materials and Advanced Processing

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41467-022-35426-810.1038/s41467-022-35426-8 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41467-024-46176-010.1038/s41467-024-46176-0 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41467-024-45533-310.1038/s41467-024-45533-3 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41467-024-46749-z10.1038/s41467-024-46749-z ↗
5. 10.1038/s41586-025-08610-110.1038/s41586-025-08610-1 ↗
6. 10.1038/ncomms1287610.1038/ncomms12876 ↗
7. 10.1002/smll.20210350110.1002/smll.202103501 ↗
8. 10.1039/D1CC01655E10.1039/D1CC01655E ↗
9. 10.1002/anie.20230655310.1002/anie.202306553 ↗
10. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.5310.1038/nenergy.2016.53 ↗
11. 10.1002/adfm.20251659310.1002/adfm.202516593 ↗
12. 10.1002/adfm.20230834510.1002/adfm.202308345 ↗
13. 10.1002/smll.20210244810.1002/smll.202102448 ↗
14. 10.1126/sciadv.adr903810.1126/sciadv.adr9038 ↗
15. 10.1021/acscatal.5c0224710.1021/acscatal.5c02247 ↗
16. 10.1126/sciadv.adw089410.1126/sciadv.adw0894 ↗
17. 10.1021/jacs.3c0349310.1021/jacs.3c03493 ↗
18. 10.1002/smll.20250194610.1002/smll.202501946 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41598-025-95130-710.1038/s41598-025-95130-7 ↗
20. 10.1021/jacs.4c1283810.1021/jacs.4c12838 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41467-020-17263-910.1038/s41467-020-17263-9 ↗
22. 10.1021/acscatal.4c0006710.1021/acscatal.4c00067 ↗
23. 10.1021/jacs.3c1448610.1021/jacs.3c14486 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41565-024-01635-z10.1038/s41565-024-01635-z ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20221149710.1002/adma.202211497 ↗
26. 10.1039/C3EE43683G10.1039/C3EE43683G ↗
27. 10.1021/jacs.8b0880010.1021/jacs.8b08800 ↗
28. 10.1039/C9TA07651D10.1039/C9TA07651D ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b1267010.1021/acs.jpcc.7b12670 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsomega.2c0077610.1021/acsomega.2c00776 ↗
31. 10.1039/D3TA06651G10.1039/D3TA06651G ↗
32. 10.3390/molecules2621636210.3390/molecules26216362 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c0293810.1021/acs.jpclett.3c02938 ↗
34. 10.1039/D3TA07239H10.1039/D3TA07239H ↗
35. 10.1039/D1TA04256D10.1039/D1TA04256D ↗
36. 10.1038/s41524-022-00896-310.1038/s41524-022-00896-3 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.08380210.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.083802 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41467-024-50446-210.1038/s41467-024-50446-2 ↗
39. 10.1002/smll.20230936310.1002/smll.202309363 ↗
40. 10.1002/smll.20230205510.1002/smll.202302055 ↗
41. 10.1109/MCSE.2007.5810.1109/MCSE.2007.58 ↗
42. 10.1023/A:101093340432410.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
43. 10.1214/aos/101320345110.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
44. Pedregosa F. · J. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2011 · 12 · 2825
45. Paszke A. · 2019 · 32
46. 10.1021/jacs.9b1264210.1021/jacs.9b12642 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
48. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
49. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.139610.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1396 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.150510.1103/PhysRevB.57.1505 ↗