journal article·2014-12

A comparison of nanoindentation pile-up in bulk materials and thin films

N. Moharrami, S.J. Bull

Thin Solid Films· Volume 572
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract During nanoindentation testing, there are many issues that need to be considered if high-quality data are to be obtained when testing both bulk and thin film materials. For soft materials, one of the main issues in determining mechanical properties based on the Oliver and Pharr method is the accuracy of the determined contact area due to the pile-up around the indenter leading to a significant increase in the contact area. During nanoindentation tests for both thin films and bulk materials, the deformation mechanisms and, therefore, the governing dislocation nucleation and propagation events are complex. Hence, the volume of the pile-up is not always proportional to the indentation load and its shape can vary. Therefore, an accurate measurement of the Young's modulus and hardness requires the determination of the contact area using another technique such as atomic force microscopy (AFM) or scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images. In this study, AFM images obtained using the indenter tip after the main indentation cycle was completed were analysed to measure the pile-up heights and widths obtained in bulk materials (copper, gold and aluminium), and the results were compared to those from their respective thin films under similar indentation conditions. It was observed that the amount of pile-up that appeared in the thin films was considerably higher than in the bulk materials. Thin films with low hardness values deposited on harder substrates show a different plastic response under the indenter. During the indentation tests, the harder substrate does not deform to the same extent as the softer deposited coating and consequently it has an extreme effect on the degree of pile-up formation for the thin film.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Dealing with imperfection: quantifying potential length scale artefacts from nominally spherical indenter probes10.1088/0957-4484/18/30/305503 ↗
2. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic-modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments10.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
3. Incorporation of nitrogen in sputtered carbon films10.1016/0257-8972(95)02534-0 ↗
4. A method for interpreting the data from depth-sensing indentation instruments10.1557/JMR.1986.0601 ↗
5. Analysis of nanoindentation load–displacement loading curves10.1557/JMR.1996.0250 ↗
6. What is indentation hardness?10.1016/S0257-8972(00)00896-3 ↗
7. Extracting hardness and Young's modulus from load–displacement curve10.3139/146.020870 ↗
8. Scaling, dimensional analysis, and indentation measurements10.1016/j.mser.2004.05.001 ↗
9. Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: advances in understanding and refinements to methodology10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
10. Fischer-Cripps · 2011
11. Computational modeling of the forward and reverse problems in instrumented sharp indentation10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00295-6 ↗
12. Analysis of Vicker's indentation10.1016/0020-7683(94)90225-9 ↗
13. Dual-indentation technique for the assessment of strength properties of cohesive-frictional materials10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.03.035 ↗
14. Determination of elastoplastic properties by instrumented sharp indentation10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00011-1 ↗
15. Tabor · 2000
16. Determining the elastic modulus and hardness of an ultra-thin film on a substrate using nanoindentation10.1557/jmr.2009.0144 ↗
17. Nanoindentation studies of materials10.1016/S1369-7021(06)71495-X ↗
18. Tsui · 1997 · vol. 436 · 147
19. Direct measurement of residual contact area and volume during the nanoindentation of coated materials as an alternative method of calculating hardness10.1080/01418610208235700 ↗
20. Substrate effects on nanoindentation mechanical property measurement of soft films on hard substrates10.1557/JMR.1999.0042 ↗
21. Influences of pile-up on the measurement of mechanical properties by load and depth sensing indentation thechniques10.1557/JMR.1998.0146 ↗
22. Nanoindentation of copper thin films on silicon substrates10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00245-6 ↗
23. Nanoindentation assessment of aluminium metallisation; the effect of creep and pile-up10.1016/S0257-8972(03)00918-6 ↗
24. Scaling approach to conical indentation in elastic–plastic solids with work hardening10.1063/1.368196 ↗
25. Scaling relationships in conical indentation of elastic perfectly plastic solids10.1016/S0020-7683(97)00349-1 ↗
26. Relationships between hardness, elastic modulus, and the work of indentation10.1063/1.121873 ↗
27. Deconvolution of hardness from data obtained from nanoindentation of rough surfaces10.1557/JMR.1999.0302 ↗
28. Gwyddion: an open-source software for SPM data analysis10.2478/s11534-011-0096-2 ↗
29. Gold film with gold nitride—a conductor but harder than gold10.1063/1.1941471 ↗
30. Jahromi · 2008
31. Nanoindentation of Au and Pt/Cu thin films at elevated temperatures10.1557/JMR.2004.0331 ↗
32. On the origins and mechanisms of the indentation size effect10.3139/146.030787 ↗
33. Nanoindentation measurements of the mechanical properties of polycrystalline Au and Ag thin films on silicon substrates: effects of grain size and film thickness10.1016/j.msea.2006.04.080 ↗
34. Grain size effect on nanomechanical properties and deformation behavior of copper under nanoindentation test10.1063/1.2432873 ↗
35. Nanomechanical characterisation of solid surfaces and thin films10.1179/095066003225010227 ↗
36. Effects of the substrate on the determination of thin film mechanical properties by nanoindentation10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00328-7 ↗
37. Nanoindentation testing of gear steels10.3139/146.030793 ↗