Understanding the Stability of Pt‐Based Nanocages under Thermal Stress Using In Situ Electron Microscopy
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We report a systematic study of the thermal stability of Pt‐based cubic, octahedral, and icosahedral nanocages using high‐resolution electron microscopy coupled with in situ heating. Our results indicate that all these nanocages could be used with no observable changes up to 150 °C, with their facets still preserved at even higher temperatures. We observed the same behavior in all the nanocages under thermal stress: hole enlargement and atom migration toward the edges to create nanoframes. This transformation could be rationalized by the thermodynamic driving force to minimize surface free energy. The octahedral nanocages were found to be more stable by 50 °C than the icosahedral nanocages, suggesting that the thermal stability of such catalysts can be potentially optimized to extend their usage toward different applications at elevated temperatures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Chemical and Physical Properties of Materials · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Chemistry and Biochemistry Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia 30332 United States
The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology Emory University Atlanta, Georgia 30332 United States
Hitachi High-Technologies Canada Toronto, Ontario M9W 6A4 Canada
Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831 United States
Funding
National Science Foundation
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0037410.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00374 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20160456310.1002/adma.201604563 ↗
3. 10.1021/nl903062e10.1021/nl903062e ↗
4. 10.1021/nn204682810.1021/nn2046828 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.aab080110.1126/science.aab0801 ↗
6. Shao F.-Q. · Int. J. Hydrog. Energy · 2017
7. Rylander P.
8. 10.1038/nmat232910.1038/nmat2329 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.cej.2016.02.03310.1016/j.cej.2016.02.033 ↗
10. 10.1002/1615-6854(200107)1:2<105::AID-FUCE105>3.0.CO;2-910.1002/1615-6854(200107)1:2<105::AID-FUCE105>3.0.CO;2-9 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.05.03110.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.05.031 ↗
12. 10.1051/epjconf/20161140201010.1051/epjconf/201611402010 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0084410.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00844 ↗
14. 10.1038/ncomms992510.1038/ncomms9925 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0869210.1021/acsnano.6b08692 ↗
16. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070511-15504810.1146/annurev-matsci-070511-155048 ↗
17. 10.1021/cr400544s10.1021/cr400544s ↗
18. 10.1038/sdata.2016.8010.1038/sdata.2016.80 ↗
19. Somorjai G. A. · 2010
20. 10.1021/jz401496d10.1021/jz401496d ↗
21. 10.1021/jp036626410.1021/jp0366264 ↗
22. D. Holec F. Fischer D. Vollath arXiv2014.
23. 10.1063/1.182623710.1063/1.1826237 ↗
24. 10.1021/j100213a00710.1021/j100213a007 ↗
25. 10.1016/0022-0728(94)03467-210.1016/0022-0728(94)03467-2 ↗
26. 10.1021/ja048606110.1021/ja0486061 ↗
27. 10.1021/nl049525610.1021/nl0495256 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0020-1693(00)87444-710.1016/S0020-1693(00)87444-7 ↗
29. 10.1021/cr030705u10.1021/cr030705u ↗
30. 10.1134/S003602361210014210.1134/S0036023612100142 ↗
31. 10.1002/anie.20060306810.1002/anie.200603068 ↗
32. 10.1002/adma.20070130110.1002/adma.200701301 ↗
33. 10.1021/jacs.7b0108110.1021/jacs.7b01081 ↗
34. 10.1021/ja066023g10.1021/ja066023g ↗
35. 10.1007/BF0322143310.1007/BF03221433 ↗
36. 10.1021/ja303950v10.1021/ja303950v ↗
37. 10.1038/ncomms859410.1038/ncomms8594 ↗
38. 10.1021/jacs.5b1253010.1021/jacs.5b12530 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0514010.1021/acs.nanolett.5b05140 ↗