journal article·2018-01Open access

Understanding the Stability of Pt‐Based Nanocages under Thermal Stress Using In Situ Electron Microscopy

Madeline Vara, Xue Wang, Jane Howe, Miaofang Chi, Younan Xia

ChemNanoMat· Volume 4· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract We report a systematic study of the thermal stability of Pt‐based cubic, octahedral, and icosahedral nanocages using high‐resolution electron microscopy coupled with in situ heating. Our results indicate that all these nanocages could be used with no observable changes up to 150 °C, with their facets still preserved at even higher temperatures. We observed the same behavior in all the nanocages under thermal stress: hole enlargement and atom migration toward the edges to create nanoframes. This transformation could be rationalized by the thermodynamic driving force to minimize surface free energy. The octahedral nanocages were found to be more stable by 50 °C than the icosahedral nanocages, suggesting that the thermal stability of such catalysts can be potentially optimized to extend their usage toward different applications at elevated temperatures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Chemical and Physical Properties of Materials · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemistry and Biochemistry Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia 30332 United States

The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology Emory University Atlanta, Georgia 30332 United States

Hitachi High-Technologies Canada Toronto, Ontario M9W 6A4 Canada

Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831 United States

Funding

National Science Foundation

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0037410.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00374 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20160456310.1002/adma.201604563 ↗
3. 10.1021/nl903062e10.1021/nl903062e ↗
4. 10.1021/nn204682810.1021/nn2046828 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.aab080110.1126/science.aab0801 ↗
6. Shao F.-Q. · Int. J. Hydrog. Energy · 2017
7. Rylander P.
8. 10.1038/nmat232910.1038/nmat2329 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.cej.2016.02.03310.1016/j.cej.2016.02.033 ↗
10. 10.1002/1615-6854(200107)1:2<105::AID-FUCE105>3.0.CO;2-910.1002/1615-6854(200107)1:2<105::AID-FUCE105>3.0.CO;2-9 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.05.03110.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.05.031 ↗
12. 10.1051/epjconf/20161140201010.1051/epjconf/201611402010 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0084410.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00844 ↗
14. 10.1038/ncomms992510.1038/ncomms9925 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0869210.1021/acsnano.6b08692 ↗
16. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070511-15504810.1146/annurev-matsci-070511-155048 ↗
17. 10.1021/cr400544s10.1021/cr400544s ↗
18. 10.1038/sdata.2016.8010.1038/sdata.2016.80 ↗
19. Somorjai G. A. · 2010
20. 10.1021/jz401496d10.1021/jz401496d ↗
21. 10.1021/jp036626410.1021/jp0366264 ↗
22. D. Holec F. Fischer D. Vollath arXiv2014.
23. 10.1063/1.182623710.1063/1.1826237 ↗
24. 10.1021/j100213a00710.1021/j100213a007 ↗
25. 10.1016/0022-0728(94)03467-210.1016/0022-0728(94)03467-2 ↗
26. 10.1021/ja048606110.1021/ja0486061 ↗
27. 10.1021/nl049525610.1021/nl0495256 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0020-1693(00)87444-710.1016/S0020-1693(00)87444-7 ↗
29. 10.1021/cr030705u10.1021/cr030705u ↗
30. 10.1134/S003602361210014210.1134/S0036023612100142 ↗
31. 10.1002/anie.20060306810.1002/anie.200603068 ↗
32. 10.1002/adma.20070130110.1002/adma.200701301 ↗
33. 10.1021/jacs.7b0108110.1021/jacs.7b01081 ↗
34. 10.1021/ja066023g10.1021/ja066023g ↗
35. 10.1007/BF0322143310.1007/BF03221433 ↗
36. 10.1021/ja303950v10.1021/ja303950v ↗
37. 10.1038/ncomms859410.1038/ncomms8594 ↗
38. 10.1021/jacs.5b1253010.1021/jacs.5b12530 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0514010.1021/acs.nanolett.5b05140 ↗