journal article·2026-07-09

From stem to strand: a critical review of banana pseudostem fiber processing, properties, and life-cycle assessment for sustainable textiles

Sailakshmi S, Muthuvel I, Bal Krishna, Manikanda Boopathi N, Kavitha P S, Uma Maheswari T, Priyadharshini D

Publisher page

Abstract

The global textile industry is currently undergoing a paradigm shift toward sustainability, driven by the urgent need to reduce the environmental damage caused by the production of traditional cotton and synthetic fibers. This review critically assesses the potential of banana pseudostem fiber (BPSF) as a high-performance, lignocellulosic alternative from underused agricultural biomass. Globally, banana pseudostem residue accounts for approximately 114 million tons annually, with India contributing around 51.18 million tons. We provide a comprehensive analysis of the physicochemical structure of BPSF, highlighting its superior tensile strength, ranging from 529 to 754 MPa, favorable cellulose content (63% to 85%), and crystallinity index (60% to 71%), which make it a viable competitor to traditional natural fibers. A systematic assessment of the extraction methods—from mechanical stripping to advanced enzymatic degumming and microbial retting—is presented, focusing on the trade-offs between fiber yield, quality, and environmental impacts. The work also includes a comparative, technical-sustainability assessment and a conceptual life-cycle assessment, which show that BPSF offers a significant reduction in blue water footprint and greenhouse gas emissions compared with cotton, with a projected global warming potential of 0.5 to 2.5 kg CO 2 eq./kg of BPSF versus 4.85 kg CO 2 eq./kg of cotton.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Fruit Science, Horticultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, TN, India

Department of Fruit Science, Horticultural College and Research Institute for Women, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tiruchirappalli, TN, India

Plant Molecular Biology Lab, Jain R&D, Jain Hills, Jain Irrigation Systems Limited, Jalgaon, Maharashtra, TN, India

Department of Plant Biotechnology, Center for Plant Molecular Biology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, TN, India

Directorate of Planning and Monitoring, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, TN, India

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s43017-020-0039-910.1038/s43017-020-0039-9 ↗
2. Garcia-Chavez L, Vural-Gursel I, O’Keeffe S, et al. Understanding the policies and carbon accounting frameworks which are defining the potential role of biobased products to meet climate change targets. Report, 2023. The Netherlands: Wageningen Food & Biobased Research.
3. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e3988010.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39880 ↗
4. 10.3390/agronomy1004048910.3390/agronomy10040489 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41612-019-0093-510.1038/s41612-019-0093-5 ↗
6. 10.9734/jsrr/2025/v31i7322610.9734/jsrr/2025/v31i73226 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.toxrep.2019.10.00310.1016/j.toxrep.2019.10.003 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.11832810.1016/j.indcrop.2024.118328 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.2758310.1002/pc.27583 ↗
10. 10.1002/pen.2674610.1002/pen.26746 ↗
11. 10.1039/D4NJ03831B10.1039/D4NJ03831B ↗
12. 10.1039/D4GC05569A10.1039/D4GC05569A ↗
13. 10.3390/fib1309011910.3390/fib13090119 ↗
14. 10.1080/15440478.2024.230400410.1080/15440478.2024.2304004 ↗
15. 10.3390/molecules2617528210.3390/molecules26175282 ↗
16. 10.5772/intechopen.8220410.5772/intechopen.82204 ↗
17. 10.1007/s10570-025-06660-210.1007/s10570-025-06660-2 ↗
18. 10.1007/978-981-13-3669-0_1010.1007/978-981-13-3669-0_10 ↗
19. 10.1007/s13399-024-05666-310.1007/s13399-024-05666-3 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10570-025-06461-710.1007/s10570-025-06461-7 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.11110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.111 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.11691210.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116912 ↗
23. 10.1007/s13197-020-04273-010.1007/s13197-020-04273-0 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.08.00810.1016/j.enconman.2013.08.008 ↗
25. Candra SE, Dwilaksana D, Arisandi HD, et al. Tensile Strength of PVA Biocomposites Filled with Abaca Banana Leaf Fiber: Effect of Adding Fiber Mass Fraction. J Nat Fibre Polym Compos 2025; 4: 2–7.
26. 10.1080/15440478.2011.60161410.1080/15440478.2011.601614 ↗
27. 10.1080/15440478.2023.220445110.1080/15440478.2023.2204451 ↗
28. Livifile SW, Majaja BA, Kichonge B. Physical and mechanical properties of four banana cultivars popularly grown in southern highlands of Tanzania. South Asian Res J Nat Prod 2020; 2: 182–196.
29. 10.1080/15440478.2023.216882110.1080/15440478.2023.2168821 ↗
30. 10.15376/biores.10.2.3724-373510.15376/biores.10.2.3724-3735 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41598-024-76460-410.1038/s41598-024-76460-4 ↗
32. Chengoué AM, Tchotang T, Fokam CB, et al. Influence of extractions techniques on the physico-mechanical properties of banana pseudo-stem fibers. J Mater Environ Sci 2020; 11: 1121–1128.
33. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11913110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119131 ↗
34. Gumarães CC, Lima PRL, Toledo Filho RD. Properties of banana fibers extracted using equipment from the sisal agro-industry. Caderno Pedagógico 2024; 21: e7665–e7665.10.54033/cadpedv21n9-084 ↗
35. 10.1186/s12951-025-03604-710.1186/s12951-025-03604-7 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.matchar.2007.10.01110.1016/j.matchar.2007.10.011 ↗
37. 10.3390/polym1716222410.3390/polym17162224 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.10401510.1016/j.rineng.2025.104015 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2007.03.00210.1016/j.indcrop.2007.03.002 ↗
40. 10.1007/s10098-021-02041-y10.1007/s10098-021-02041-y ↗
41. 10.1016/j.nxmate.2025.10092010.1016/j.nxmate.2025.100920 ↗
42. 10.1007/s12588-010-0010-610.1007/s12588-010-0010-6 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.03810.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.038 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jtte.2023.02.00210.1016/j.jtte.2023.02.002 ↗
45. 10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2016-076010.1590/1980-5373-mr-2016-0760 ↗
46. 10.1080/15440478.2020.186328710.1080/15440478.2020.1863287 ↗
47. 10.1002/pls2.1013310.1002/pls2.10133 ↗
48. Manju VV, Divakara S, Narayan Hegde V, et al. Structural and elastic properties of varieties of cotton fibers. Adv Mater Process Technol 2022; 8: 3990–4006.
49. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.06.05010.1016/j.indcrop.2018.06.050 ↗
50. 10.1007/s42452-021-04851-710.1007/s42452-021-04851-7 ↗
51. Hearle JW, Morton WE. Physical properties of textile fibres. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2008.
52. 10.1080/15440478.2019.168706710.1080/15440478.2019.1687067 ↗
53. 10.1186/s43141-023-00617-310.1186/s43141-023-00617-3 ↗
54. 10.1177/073168441349532210.1177/0731684413495322 ↗
55. Mohiuddin A, Saha MK, Hossian MS, et al. Usefulness of banana (Musa paradisiaca) wastes in manufacturing of bio-products: a review. Agric 2014; 12: 148–158.
56. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.06710.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.067 ↗
57. 10.1590/0104-1428.172210.1590/0104-1428.1722 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e0911410.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09114 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.11798510.1016/j.indcrop.2023.117985 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e1065210.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10652 ↗
61. 10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v3n3p367-37910.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v3n3p367-379 ↗
62. 10.1007/s10924-006-0042-310.1007/s10924-006-0042-3 ↗
63. 10.1007/s10853-006-0657-810.1007/s10853-006-0657-8 ↗
64. Beckwith SW. Natural fibers: nature providing technology for composites. Soc Adv Mater Process Eng 2008; 44: 64–65.
65. 10.1186/s12866-020-01794-810.1186/s12866-020-01794-8 ↗
66. 10.1080/15440478.2013.82484810.1080/15440478.2013.824848 ↗
67. 10.1021/acsomega.9b0326810.1021/acsomega.9b03268 ↗
68. 10.1201/978142004588810.1201/9781420045888 ↗
69. 10.1080/15440478.2021.187536710.1080/15440478.2021.1875367 ↗
70. 10.3390/polym1307099410.3390/polym13070994 ↗
71. 10.1080/09276440.2025.246770010.1080/09276440.2025.2467700 ↗
72. 10.1080/15440478.2017.140150510.1080/15440478.2017.1401505 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.08310.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.083 ↗
74. 10.1177/0892705724125432410.1177/08927057241254324 ↗
75. 10.1007/s40799-017-0203-410.1007/s40799-017-0203-4 ↗
76. 10.1080/15440478.2018.153419110.1080/15440478.2018.1534191 ↗
77. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab22d910.1088/2053-1591/ab22d9 ↗
78. 10.1002/pc.2672710.1002/pc.26727 ↗
79. 10.1007/s42247-023-00620-x10.1007/s42247-023-00620-x ↗
80. 10.3390/polym1324428010.3390/polym13244280 ↗
81. 10.1177/073168441663389810.1177/0731684416633898 ↗
82. 10.1680/jgrma.24.0010810.1680/jgrma.24.00108 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.10499610.1016/j.rineng.2025.104996 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003 ↗
85. 10.1177/0021998325136229510.1177/00219983251362295 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2025.11425310.1016/j.vacuum.2025.114253 ↗
87. 10.59717/j.xinn-mater.2024.10013210.59717/j.xinn-mater.2024.100132 ↗
88. 10.1080/09276440.2025.252559010.1080/09276440.2025.2525590 ↗
89. 10.1080/15440478.2017.140150410.1080/15440478.2017.1401504 ↗
90. 10.1080/15440478.2020.176445610.1080/15440478.2020.1764456 ↗
91. 10.1002/app.3922010.1002/app.39220 ↗
92. 10.1080/15440478.2021.195842810.1080/15440478.2021.1958428 ↗
93. 10.1366/12-0661110.1366/12-06611 ↗
94. 10.1007/s13399-020-01219-610.1007/s13399-020-01219-6 ↗
95. 10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800020031x10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800020031x ↗
96. Tutus A, Ezici AC, Ates S. Chemical, morphological and anatomical properties and evaluation of cotton stalks (Gossypium hirsutum L.) In pulp industry. Sci Res Essays 2010; 5: 1553–1560.
97. 10.15376/biores.6.1.154-17710.15376/biores.6.1.154-177 ↗
98. 10.1515/npprj-2019-005710.1515/npprj-2019-0057 ↗
99. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.11638310.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116383 ↗
100. 10.1201/9780429424137-1110.1201/9780429424137-11 ↗