Effect of fabric structure changes during manufacturing and finishing on fabric hand and skin comfort: A study of a double-faced semi-worsted wool fabric
Source abstract
Abstract
Unlike color, which has already been widely digitized and standardized in the textile industry, fabric hand feel and skin comfort remain weakly standardized and digitized. The hand feel properties of fabrics are highly sensitive to structural changes induced by finishing processes, making it challenging for manufacturers in the wool textile sector to consistently reproduce the desired hand feel characteristics when processing new samples. Motivated by this gap, this study proposes a structure-centric framework, utilizing SEM and the fabric touch tester (FTT) to correlate processing-driven micro/mesoscale alterations with hand feel and skin comfort performance, enabling standardizable measurement and predictive control. A double-faced semi-worsted fabric (80% wool, 20% Tencel) was sampled across 12 manufacturing and finishing processes. This study quantitatively characterizes and focuses on three structure-related descriptors: total fabric hair thickness ( {T}hair ), fabric core thickness ( {T}core ), and surface fiber alignment dispersion, and relates them to fabric hand and skin comfort primary sensory indices as well as instrumental parameters measured by the FTT. Across the sample, {T}hair was strongly and positively associated with compression work ( {R}2=0.87, p<0.0001 ), compression recovery rate ( {R}2=0.93, p<0.0001 ), and the hand feel warmness index ( {R}2=0.93, p<0.0001 ). Fabric core thickness was positively associated with skin comfort softness and the total indices, and exhibited nonlinear relationships with bending-related indices: bending average rigidity in the weft direction ( {R}2=0.97, p<0.0001 ) and bending work in the weft direction ( {R}2=0.92, p<0.005 ). By quantifying structural properties of wool textile during production, the study establishes predictive links from structure to hand feel/skin comfort performance and defines actionable set points for finishing. This supports target-based control, improves consistency and energy efficiency in line with the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation, and advances digital, performance driven manufacturing.
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Munsell AH. A color notation. 5th ed. New York: Munsell color company, 1919.
2. Pantone. What are Pantone color systems?https://www.pantone.com/color-systems/pantone-color-systems-explained (2025 accessed 15 October 2025).
3. International Organization for Standardization and International Commission on Illumination. ISO/CIE 11664-4:2019: Colorimetry—Part 4: CIE 1976 Lab* colour space. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2019.
4. Oulton D. Technology for colour management. In: Proc 1st international conference on digital technologies for the textile industries. University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, Manchester, UK, 5–6 September 2013, pp. 1-10.
5. datacolor. Dyer color formulation software: Match textile www.datacolor.com/business-solutions/product/datacolor-match-textile (2025 accessed 15 October 2025).
6. 10.1080/15440478.2022.210256210.1080/15440478.2022.2102562 ↗
7. Wang X, Zhang S, Brubacher K, et al. Fabric hand digitalization and traceability in wool textile manufacturing processes. Text Bioeng Inform Symp Proc 2024; 2024: 310-321.
8. 10.1177/004051751243812610.1177/0040517512438126 ↗
9. 10.1080/00405000.2021.198219010.1080/00405000.2021.1982190 ↗
10. 10.1080/0040516960868886610.1080/00405169608688866 ↗
11. 10.1080/00405000.2015.104631010.1080/00405000.2015.1046310 ↗
12. 10.1177/00405175930630100310.1177/004051759306301003 ↗
13. 10.1007/s12221-014-2671-910.1007/s12221-014-2671-9 ↗
14. 10.1080/0040516010868895110.1080/00405160108688951 ↗
15. Li Y. Clothing comfort and its application. Text Asia 1998; 29(7): 29-33.
16. 10.1080/00405167.1977.1075009510.1080/00405167.1977.10750095 ↗
17. 10.1002/app.5241610.1002/app.52416 ↗
18. 10.1007/s11249-012-0023-810.1007/s11249-012-0023-8 ↗
19. 10.1080/00140139918524310.1080/001401399185243 ↗
20. 10.1109/CW.2007.5710.1109/CW.2007.57 ↗
21. Pailthorpe M, Wood E. 15. Principles of Wool Fabric Finishing. North Melbourne, VIC: Australian Wool Education Trust, 2012.
22. 10.1533/9780857095633.3.36310.1533/9780857095633.3.363 ↗
23. 10.1201/978143982346010.1201/9781439823460 ↗
24. 10.1016/B978-0-323-99598-6.00018-910.1016/B978-0-323-99598-6.00018-9 ↗
25. 10.1038/154772a010.1038/154772a0 ↗
26. 10.1533/9781845690984.3.28910.1533/9781845690984.3.289 ↗
27. 10.1533/9781845690984.3.34210.1533/9781845690984.3.342 ↗
28. Eryuruk S, Kalaoğlu F, Bahadir S, et al. Analysing the effect of decatising on the frictional properties of wool fabrics. Fibres Text East Eur 2014; 3(105): 79-83.
29. 10.5057/ijae.IJAE-D-16-0002710.5057/ijae.IJAE-D-16-00027 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.220810.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.2208 ↗
31. 10.3993/jfbim0295110.3993/jfbim02951 ↗
32. 10.1177/004051751140738110.1177/0040517511407381 ↗
33. 10.1177/00405175890590060810.1177/004051758905900608 ↗
34. 10.1533/9781845690984.2.21910.1533/9781845690984.2.219 ↗
35. Behery H (ed.). Effect of mechanical and physical properties on fabric hand. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2005.
36. Ecodesign for sustainable products regulation. https://commission.europa.eu/energy-climate-change-environment/standards-tools-and-labels/products-labelling-rules-and-requirements/ecodesign-sustainable-products-regulation_en. (2024 accessed 15 November 2024).
37. FTT®: Fabric touch tester. https://sdlatlas.com/products/ftt-fabric-touch-tester (2025 accessed 15 April 2025).
38. ASTM. Standard practice for conditioning and testing textiles. In: Designation: D1776/D1776M − 20. ASTM international, 2020.
39. 10.1007/s12221-014-1548-210.1007/s12221-014-1548-2 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.07.00810.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.07.008 ↗
41. Wang J, Du J. Evaluation of tactile comfort of underwear fabrics. J Donghua Univ 2022; 39(5): 496–504.
42. FTT® Fabric touch tester complies with new FZ/T 01166-2022 standard as the recommended instrument for hand feel testing standards. SDL ATAS 2022.
43. FZ/T 01166-2022 Textile fabric touch determination and evaluation method: Multi-index integration method. Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People’s Republic of China 2022.
44. Scott T. Announcing the 101st edition of the AATCC manual of international test methods and procedures. American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists: AATCC 2026 https://www.aatcc.org/techmanual26/ (accessed 11 April 2026).
45. FTT: Fabric touch tester meets new AATCC standard for instrumental fabric hand evaluation. SDL ATAS 2025.
46. Li Y, Hu JY, Lubos H. Textile fabric testing. US Patent US6601457B2, 2003.
47. 10.1038/nprot.2014.02410.1038/nprot.2014.024 ↗
48. 10.26420/advrestexteng.2017.101810.26420/advrestexteng.2017.1018 ↗
49. Tohidi SD, Jeddi AA, Nosrati H. Analyzing of the woven fabric geometry on the bending rigidity properties. Int J Text Sci 2013; 2(4): 73-80.
50. Hu J. Structure and mechanics of woven fabrics. Vol. 35. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2004.