journal article·2026-07-03

Study on the underlying brain mechanism of fabric-evoked prickling sensation based on fMRI

Yonghao Mei, Yuan Tao, Jie Yuan, Xinghua Hong, Han Li, Zimin Jin, Qicai Wang, Tao Sun

Publisher page

Abstract

Prickling is one of the crucial determinants of textile comfort. Existing research indicates that prickling is a composite perception integrating the sensory modalities of pain and itch. However, the underlying functional mechanisms of the brain have not been fully explained. In this study, the technology of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was employed to investigate the brain functional responses elicited by fabrics with different prickling levels. Ten healthy participants were recruited and exposed to tactile stimulation from the three fabrics, Fabric A (wool, high prickling), Fabric B (wool, medium prickling), and Fabric C (cotton, low prickling). A task-based fMRI design was adopted to analyze the correlations between brain functional signals and subjective ratings from the participants. The results demonstrated that fabric-evoked prickling engaged a distributed neural network including the insula cortex (IC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), postcentral gyrus (PoCG), amygdala (Amy), and frontal lobe (FL) regions. The anterior insula, a key hub for pain processing, showed markedly stronger activation (Fabric B: z = 7.71) than the posterior insula associated with itch (Fabric B: z = 3.13), whereas activation in itch-specific regions such as the precuneus (Prec) was relatively weak. Moreover, activation intensities in the ACC and PoCG were consistent with subjective prickling ratings. These findings indicate that fabric-evoked prickling predominantly arises from synergistic activation of pain- and itch-related regions, with pain-associated areas playing a dominant role, thereby providing novel insight into the neural mechanism of fabric-induced discomfort and offering a potential method for characterizing fabric-evoked prickle.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Pain Mechanisms and Treatments · Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Bio-based Fiber Materials, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China

High Fashion Womenswear Institute, Hangzhou Polytechnic University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Clothing Engineering Research Center of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China

Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

Funding

zhejiang sci-tech university · department of education of zhejiang province

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Zhang X, Wang L, Chen Y. Evaluation methods of prickle sensation for underwear fabrics. J Text Res 2016; 37(12): 33-37.
2. Zhang L, Wang Y, Li Y. Development and ergonomic evaluation of chemical protective coveralls for oil tank cleaning. J Text Res 2013; 34(8): 100-105.
3. 10.1016/j.cej.2025.16493910.1016/j.cej.2025.164939 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsami.4c1513710.1021/acsami.4c15137 ↗
5. 10.1177/00405175920620080910.1177/004051759206200809 ↗
6. Qi Y, Liu Y, Yu W. Effect of wool fiber fineness on prickle sensation in fabrics: An objective evaluation. J Text Res 2005; 26(3): 12-14.
7. Mao N, Ao L, Zhou Q, et al. Axial compression property test of fibers and prickle sensation attribute evaluation. J Text Res 2015; 36(1): 11-17.
8. 10.1177/00405175970670060510.1177/004051759706700605 ↗
9. Garnsworthy RK, Gully RL, Kandiah RP, et al. Understanding the causes of prickle and itch from the skin contact of fabrics. Australas Text 1988; 8(4): 26-29.
10. 10.1177/00405175970670040810.1177/004051759706700408 ↗
11. Pan S. Study on Prickle Sensation of Woolen Sweater Knitted Fabrics. Master’s Thesis Donghua University 2007.
12. Wu Y, Yu W. Evaluation and Methods of Prickle Sensation in Wool Fabrics. Wool Text J 1999; 2: 29-32.
13. 10.1007/s12221-014-1548-210.1007/s12221-014-1548-2 ↗
14. Ting Y. Study on Evaluation Method of Fabric–skin Contact Comfort Based on Electrophysiological Responses. PhD Thesis Donghua University 2024.
15. Yu X. Neuroelectrophysiological Evaluation and Cognitive Study of Tactile Perception in Silk Fabrics. Master’s Thesis Soochow University 2017.
16. 10.1177/030100662097699210.1177/0301006620976992 ↗
17. Wang Q, Yu W, Chen K, et al. Fabric tactile perception and its brain functional research. Int J Med Radiol 2014; 37(4): 323-327.
18. 10.1016/j.pain.2008.10.02710.1016/j.pain.2008.10.027 ↗
19. 10.1016/S1053-8119(01)92252-910.1016/S1053-8119(01)92252-9 ↗
20. 10.1007/s12221-019-8770-x10.1007/s12221-019-8770-x ↗
21. 10.1111/srt.1296510.1111/srt.12965 ↗
22. 10.1111/srt.1344610.1111/srt.13446 ↗
23. 10.1177/004051751882189910.1177/0040517518821899 ↗
24. 10.1016/B978-012372560-8/50008-510.1016/B978-012372560-8/50008-5 ↗
25. 10.1038/nn95510.1038/nn955 ↗
26. 10.2340/00015555-200610.2340/00015555-2006 ↗
27. 10.1159/00041015010.1159/000410150 ↗
28. 10.1016/0166-2236(92)90102-E10.1016/0166-2236(92)90102-E ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.03.00510.1016/j.ejpain.2006.03.005 ↗
30. 10.1152/jn.1943.6.5.36110.1152/jn.1943.6.5.361 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41467-020-16859-510.1038/s41467-020-16859-5 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jid.2019.04.00710.1016/j.jid.2019.04.007 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.00110.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.001 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.01.03810.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.01.038 ↗
35. Catafau AM, Kulisevsky J, Bernà L, et al. Relationship between cerebral perfusion in frontal-limbic-basal ganglia circuits and neuropsychologic impairment in patients with subclinical hepatic encephalopathy. J Nucl Med 2000; 41(3): 405-410.
36. Lotze M, Flor H, Grodd W, et al. Phantom movements and pain. An fMRI study in upper limb amputees. Brain 2001; 124(11): 2268-2277.
37. 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01483-210.1016/S1364-6613(00)01483-2 ↗
38. 10.1371/journal.pone.004871110.1371/journal.pone.0048711 ↗
39. 10.1111/srt.1296510.1111/srt.12965 ↗
40. 10.1006/nimg.2002.127010.1006/nimg.2002.1270 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.08.04610.1016/j.brainres.2015.08.046 ↗
42. 10.1093/cercor/bhi08910.1093/cercor/bhi089 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.03.00110.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.03.001 ↗
44. 10.1152/jn.00431.200110.1152/jn.00431.2001 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.01810.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.018 ↗
46. 10.1098/rstb.2005.166110.1098/rstb.2005.1661 ↗
47. Zhong H, Wu W. The brain mechanism of experimental itch: a Meta-analysis. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging 2017; 8(4): 302-307.
48. Horn JDV, Irimia A, Torgerson CM, et al. Mapping connectivity damage in the case of phineas gage. PLoS ONE 2012; 7(5): e37454.
49. Valet M, Pfab F, Sprenger T, et al. Cerebral processing of histamine-induced itch using short-term alternating temperature modulation – An fMRI study. J Invest Dermatol 2007; 128: 116-119.
50. 10.1016/S0987-7053(00)00227-610.1016/S0987-7053(00)00227-6 ↗
51. 10.1152/jn.00253.201010.1152/jn.00253.2010 ↗
52. Najafi P, Dufor O, Ben Salem D, et al. Itch processing in the brain. JEADV 2021; 35(5): 1058-1066.