Balancing preference and compatibility: A multiobjective optimization framework for outfit recommendation
Source abstract
Abstract
Garment recommendation in fashion e-commerce requires a practical balance between personalized user preference and outfit compatibility. Existing recommendation methods usually combine these two goals into a single scalar objective, which limits their ability to represent diverse trade-offs in apparel selection. This study proposes a multiobjective outfit recommendation (MOOR) framework that formulates outfit recommendation as a multiobjective optimization problem and searches for Pareto-optimal outfit solutions. To estimate the two objectives, the framework incorporates a heterogeneous graph-based user preference model for capturing sparse and higher-order preference signals, and a multimodal outfit compatibility model for assessing visual, textual, and attribute-level coherence between garments. A task-specific evolutionary search strategy is further introduced to explore candidate top–bottom combinations while preserving recommendation diversity. Experiments on the IQON3000 dataset show that the proposed framework provides strong preference and compatibility estimation and generates diverse trade-off solutions with favorable outfit-level quality under the reported evaluation protocol. These findings support the value of explicitly modeling the preference–compatibility trade-off in garment recommendation systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis · 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Computer and Artificial Intelligence, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing, China
Academy of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Beijing Institute of Fashion Technology, Beijing, China
China Conservatory of Music, Beijing, China
Funding
Beijing Educational Science Planning 2025 Priority Focus Project
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/TMM.2021.305951410.1109/TMM.2021.3059514 ↗
2. 10.1109/BigMM50055.2020.0004310.1109/BigMM50055.2020.00043 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ipm.2023.10343410.1016/j.ipm.2023.103434 ↗
4. 10.1109/BigMM50055.2020.0003910.1109/BigMM50055.2020.00039 ↗
5. 10.1145/3343031.335095610.1145/3343031.3350956 ↗
6. 10.1145/3331184.333126710.1145/3331184.3331267 ↗
7. 10.1109/ICVADV63329.2025.1096134910.1109/ICVADV63329.2025.10961349 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.12575810.1016/j.eswa.2024.125758 ↗
9. 10.1145/3474085.347553710.1145/3474085.3475537 ↗
10. 10.1080/01969722.2022.206254410.1080/01969722.2022.2062544 ↗
11. 10.1145/2872427.288303710.1145/2872427.2883037 ↗
12. Zhao Y. Design of garment style recommendation system based on interactive genetic algorithm. Comput Intell Neurosci 2022; 2022: 9132165.
13. 10.1177/004051751880120010.1177/0040517518801200 ↗
14. Rendle S Freudenthaler C Gantner Z et al. BPR: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. Preprint http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.2618 (2012 accessed 11 October 2024).
15. Bracher C, Heinz S, Vollgraf R. Fashion DNA: merging content and sales data for recommendation and article mapping. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv160902489.
16. 10.1145/3331184.333125410.1145/3331184.3331254 ↗
17. 10.1145/3292500.333065210.1145/3292500.3330652 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.neucom.2025.12944610.1016/j.neucom.2025.129446 ↗
19. 10.1145/3397271.340108010.1145/3397271.3401080 ↗
20. 10.3390/make603010410.3390/make6030104 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.eswa.2025.12840210.1016/j.eswa.2025.128402 ↗
22. 10.3390/electronics1307139810.3390/electronics13071398 ↗
23. 10.1109/ICCV.2015.52710.1109/ICCV.2015.527 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.patrec.2021.04.00910.1016/j.patrec.2021.04.009 ↗
25. 10.1109/TMM.2023.324679610.1109/TMM.2023.3246796 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.neucom.2019.05.08110.1016/j.neucom.2019.05.081 ↗
27. 10.1109/CBMI50038.2021.946191210.1109/CBMI50038.2021.9461912 ↗
28. 10.1007/s11042-023-15290-410.1007/s11042-023-15290-4 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.elerap.2024.10145110.1016/j.elerap.2024.101451 ↗
30. 10.1145/3308558.331344410.1145/3308558.3313444 ↗
31. Vasileva MI, Plummer BA, Dusad K, et al. Learning type-aware embeddings for fashion compatibility. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2018, pp. 390–405.
32. Cui K, Liu S, Feng W, et al. Correlation-aware cross-modal attention network for fashion compatibility modeling in UGC systems. ACM Trans Multimed Comput Commun Appl 2025; 21: 1–24.10.1145/3698772 ↗
33. Zhang H, Yang X, Tan J, et al. Learning color compatibility in fashion outfits. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv200702388.
34. Sá J, Queiroz Marinho V, Magalhães AR, et al. Diversity vs relevance: a practical multi-objective study in luxury fashion recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM Press, pp. 2405–2409.
35. 10.1145/345718210.1145/3457182 ↗
36. 10.1109/CVPR.2018.0074810.1109/CVPR.2018.00748 ↗
37. 10.1145/3298689.334699810.1145/3298689.3346998 ↗
38. Xie R, Liu Y, Zhang S, et al. Personalized approximate Pareto-efficient recommendation. In: Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021, 2021, pp. 3839–3849.
39. 10.48550/arXiv.1810.0465010.48550/arXiv.1810.04650 ↗
40. 10.1145/332612810.1145/3326128 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.knosys.2016.04.01810.1016/j.knosys.2016.04.018 ↗
42. Hu Z, Dong Y, Wang K, et al. Heterogeneous graph transformer. In: Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020, 2020, pp. 2704–2710.
43. 10.1145/3477495.353203810.1145/3477495.3532038 ↗
44. 10.1109/TMM.2020.301802110.1109/TMM.2020.3018021 ↗
45. 10.1109/MC.2009.26310.1109/MC.2009.263 ↗
46. 10.1145/3038912.305256910.1145/3038912.3052569 ↗
47. 10.1145/3397271.340106310.1145/3397271.3401063 ↗
48. 10.1145/3539597.357048410.1145/3539597.3570484 ↗
49. 10.1145/3123266.312339410.1145/3123266.3123394 ↗
50. 10.1109/TMM.2021.313416410.1109/TMM.2021.3134164 ↗
51. 10.1109/WACV56688.2023.0035910.1109/WACV56688.2023.00359 ↗
52. Zitzler E, Laumanns M, Thiele L. SPEA2: Improving the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm. TIK Report 103. Zurich: ETH Zurich, 2001.
53. 10.1109/TEVC.2007.89275910.1109/TEVC.2007.892759 ↗