Out-of-plane shear properties and failure mechanism of 3D braided laminated composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) braided composites are extensively utilized in aerospace laminated composites owing to their superior out-of-plane shear properties and interlaminar delamination resistance compared with two-dimensional (2D) textile laminated composites. However, existing laminate models remain incapable of elucidating the enhancement mechanisms underlying the superior out-of-plane shear properties of 3D braided architectures. Understanding the influence of 3D braided yarn architecture on out-of-plane failure mechanisms is critical for enabling rapid design and batch-efficient manufacturing of aerospace composite components. This study has established a refined mechanical model for 3D braided laminated composites by integrating Hashin3D failure criterion with cohesive traction-separation law. The model quantitatively decoupled the respective contributions of braided architecture and interlaminar interfaces to out-of-plane failure. Results reveal that 3D braided laminated composites exhibit mixed failure modes of buckling and delamination, whereas 2D textile laminated composites failed predominantly through interfacial delamination. This divergence stems from the reduced interlaminar interfaces in 3D braided laminated composites mitigated catastrophic delamination risks. Concurrently, the interlaminar interlacing yarn architecture suppresses interfacial cracks propagation thereby enhancing out-of-plane properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Mechanical Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai, China
Jingwei Textile Machinery Co. Ltd., Beijing, China
Qing Dao Hong Da Textile Machinery Co. Ltd., Qingdao, China
Innovation Center for Textile Science and Technology, Donghua University, Shanghai, China
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10867210.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108672 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10793610.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107936 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.tws.2021.10823210.1016/j.tws.2021.108232 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11141210.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111412 ↗
5. Liao X, Jiao Y, Xie J, et al. Fiber-level modeling of 3D braided preforms using virtual braiding method. Compos Struct 2024; 334117988.
6. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.10991110.1016/j.compscitech.2023.109911 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.11061110.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110611 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11125610.1016/j.matdes.2022.111256 ↗
9. Johannes R, Zobeiry N, Vaziri R. A stacked sublaminate-based damage-plasticity model for simulating progressive damage in composite laminates under impact loading. Thin-Walled Struct 2020; 156107009.
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11696010.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116960 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10823010.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108230 ↗
12. Dang H, Zhang Y, Liu P, et al. Progressive failure prediction of three-dimensional woven composites using a generic multi-scale analytical model. Compos Struct 2023; 303116321.
13. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.10494410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.104944 ↗
14. Mengran L, Liu K, Ge J, et al. A novel modeling method for the mechanical behavior of 3D woven fabrics considering yarn distortion. Compos Sci Technol 2022; 230109691.
15. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.10938910.1016/j.tws.2022.109389 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.11010510.1016/j.tws.2022.110105 ↗
17. Li Y, Yan S, Yan Y, et al. Modelling of the compressive behavior of 3D braided tubular composites by a novel unit cell. Compos Struct 2022; 287115303.
18. Liu Y, Hou Y, Sapanathan T, et al. Multiscale modeling of the mechanical behavior of 3D braided CFRP composites under uniaxial tension. Compos Struct 2023; 306116601.
19. Zhai J, Kong X, Cheng S, et al. A coupled multi-scale method for predicting the viscoelastic behavior of resin-based 3D braided composites. Mater Des 2020; 195109048.
20. Zhu H, Li D, Han W, et al. Experimental and numerical study of in-plane compressive properties and failure of 3D six-directional braided composites with large braiding angle. Mater Des 2020; 195108917.
21. Du X, Zhu H, Ai J, et al. Parameterized meso-scale modeling and experimental study on the tensile damage evolution and strength of 3D five-directional braided composites. Mater Des 2021; 205109702.
22. Li Z, Liu Z, Wang Y, et al. Process-structure-performance modelling and progressive damage analysis of 3D rotary-four-directional rectangular braided composites under tensile load. Mater Des 2023; 225111523.
23. Dian-Sen L, Yang X, Zhu H, et al. Unit-cell geometry and mechanical properties of three-dimensional seven-directional braided composites. Thin-Walled Struct 2023; 182110299.
24. Liu P, Liao B, Jia L, et al. Finite element analysis of dynamic progressive failure of carbon fiber composite laminates under low velocity impact. Compos Struct 2016; 149408-422.
25. 10.1016/j.tws.2023.11105310.1016/j.tws.2023.111053 ↗
26. 10.1177/0040517524124181910.1177/00405175241241819 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.11083810.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110838 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.11279410.1016/j.compositesb.2025.112794 ↗
29. 10.1177/0040517524123214210.1177/00405175241232142 ↗
30. 10.1177/1558925021104322610.1177/15589250211043226 ↗
31. 10.1177/0040517522110852310.1177/00405175221108523 ↗
32. 10.1002/pc.2728910.1002/pc.27289 ↗
33. 10.1002/pc.2756810.1002/pc.27568 ↗
34. 10.1007/s00366-018-0616-410.1007/s00366-018-0616-4 ↗