journal article·2026-05-20Open access

Sustainable water reuse in textile processing: A hybrid nanofiltration–reverse osmosis–persulfate oxidation treatment approach

César Afonso, Jefferson E. Silveira, Juan A. Zazo, Annabel Fernandes

Abstract

Water reuse is becoming a key strategy for improving the environmental sustainability of textile processing, particularly in water-intensive operations such as dyeing and finishing, where membrane processes such as nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) are increasingly applied. However, their implementation is often constrained by the management of highly concentrated residual streams. This work proposes a hybrid membrane–oxidation strategy to enable practical minimal liquid discharge (MLD) by combining selective separation with targeted post-treatment of the concentrate. Biologically treated textile wastewater was processed by NF and RO under different operating pressures to assess permeate quality, energy demand, and retentate composition. The NF–RO configuration produced very low-salinity permeate with specific energy consumption as low as 0.38–1.2 kWh m −3 , with NF at 6 bar identified as the most energy-efficient condition. At this pressure, NF selectively concentrated sulfate-rich salts and refractory organics in the retentate, reducing scaling propensity in the downstream RO stage. The NF retentate was subsequently treated by heat-activated persulfate oxidation, optimized using a Box–Behnken design. Temperature was the dominant factor, and optimal conditions (90°C, 100% persulfate stoichiometric dosage, 10 mg L −1 Fe(II)) achieved a total organic carbon removal of ~64%. Integrating selective membrane fractionation with thermally driven oxidation offers a robust, energy-efficient route for practical MLD implementation in saline textile wastewater treatment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques · Advanced oxidation water treatment

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Fiber Materials and Environmental Technologies (FibEnTech-UBI), Department of Chemistry, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal

Chemical Engineering, Autonomous University of Madrid, Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior · Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia · Agencia Estatal de Investigació · Projeto Lusitano

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Haider A Khan SJ Nawaz MS Saleem MU. Effect of intermittent operation of lab-scale upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor on textile wastewater treatment. Desalin Water Treat 2018; 136: 120–130. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2018.2323110.5004/dwt.2018.23231 ↗
2. Amato A Merli G Prisciandaro M Ayedi K Innocenzi V. Environmental sustainability assessment of different strategies for the treatment of wastewater from textile industry. J Environ Chem Eng 2025; 13: 118761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2025.11876110.1016/j.jece.2025.118761 ↗
3. Gangwar A Rawat S Rautela A Yadav I Singh A Kumar S. Current advances in produced water treatment technologies: a perspective of techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment. Environ Dev Sustain 2024; 27: 15077–15111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04558-w10.1007/s10668-024-04558-w ↗
4. Garg MC Kumari S Malik N. Role of nanomaterials in advanced membrane technologies for groundwater purification. Environ Sci: Water Res Technol 2024; 10: 2628–2645. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4EW00353E10.1039/D4EW00353E ↗
5. Botelho Junior AB Tenório JAS Espinosa DCR. Separation of critical metals by membrane technology under a circular economy framework: A review of the state-of-the-art. Processes 2023; 11: 1256. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr1104125610.3390/pr11041256 ↗
6. Arooj A Yin J Li K Li M Zhang X. Pressure-driven membranes for advanced treatment of textile wastewater: Dye/salt fractionation concentration and cleaning strategies. Desalination 2024; 581: 117596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2024.11759610.1016/j.desal.2024.117596 ↗
7. Ezugbe EO Rathilal S. Membrane technologies in wastewater treatment: A review. Membranes 2020; 10: 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes1005008910.3390/membranes10050089 ↗
8. Finnerty CTK Childress AE Hardy KM et al. The future of municipal wastewater reuse concentrate management: Drivers challenges and opportunities. Environ Sci Technol 2024; 58: 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c0677410.1021/acs.est.3c06774 ↗
9. Yin H Qiu P Qian Y et al. Textile wastewater treatment for water reuse: A case study. Processes 2019; 7: 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr701003410.3390/pr7010034 ↗
10. Kurt E Koseoglu-Imer DY Dizge N Chellam S Koyuncu I. Pilot-scale evaluation of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for process reuse of segregated textile dyewash wastewater. Desalination 2012; 302: 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.05.01910.1016/j.desal.2012.05.019 ↗
11. Elazhar F Elazhar M El Filali N Belhamdi S Elmidaoui A Taky M. Potential of hybrid NF-RO system to enhance chloride removal and reduce membrane fouling during surface water desalination. Sep Purif Technol 2021; 261: 118299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.11829910.1016/j.seppur.2021.118299 ↗
12. Elazhar F Elazhar M El-Ghzizel S et al. Nanofiltration-reverse osmosis hybrid process for hardness removal in brackish water with a higher recovery rate and minimisation of brine discharges. Process Saf Environ Prot 2021; 153: 376–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.06.02510.1016/j.psep.2021.06.025 ↗
13. Silveira JE Paz WS Garcia-Muñoz P Zazo JA Casas JA. UV-LED/ilmenite/persulfate for azo dye mineralization: The role of sulfate in the catalyst deactivation. Appl Catal B Environ 2017; 219: 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.07.07210.1016/j.apcatb.2017.07.072 ↗
14. Liang C Huang C-F Mohanty N Kurakalva RM. A rapid spectrophotometric determination of persulfate anion in ISCO. Chemosphere 2008; 73: 1540–1543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.08.04310.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.08.043 ↗
15. Tsai S-C Huang W-Z Lin G-S Wang Z Tung K-L Chuang C-J. Evaluation of the specific energy consumption of sea water reverse osmosis integrated with membrane distillation and pressure–retarded osmosis processes with theoretical models. Membranes 2022; 12: 432. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes1204043210.3390/membranes12040432 ↗
16. Iqbal R Boemara AI Wenten IG Khoiruddin K. Preparation and characterization of negatively charged polyvinyl chloride membrane for peat water filtration. J Environ Chem Eng 2025; 13: 117467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2025.11746710.1016/j.jece.2025.117467 ↗
17. Asraf-Snir M Gilron J Oren Y. Gypsum scaling of anion exchange membranes in electrodialysis. J Membr Sci 2016; 520: 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.07.01310.1016/j.memsci.2016.07.013 ↗
18. Ashfaq MY Al-Ghouti MA Da’na DA Qiblawey H Zouari N. Effect of concentration of calcium and sulfate ions on gypsum scaling of reverse osmosis membrane mechanistic study. J Mater Res Technol 2020; 9: 13459–13473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.09.11710.1016/j.jmrt.2020.09.117 ↗
19. Liang C-Z Sun S-P Li F-Y Ong Y-K Chung T-S. Treatment of highly concentrated wastewater containing multiple synthetic dyes by a combined process of coagulation/flocculation and nanofiltration. J Membr Sci 2014; 469: 306–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.06.05710.1016/j.memsci.2014.06.057 ↗
20. Sampeney ET Bryant IM Sam RK et al. Revolutionizing industrial wastewater management in Ghana: Sustainable innovations for a cleaner future. Desalin Water Treat 2025; 324: 101589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dwt.2025.10158910.1016/j.dwt.2025.101589 ↗
21. Boivin S Ueyama T Tanaka N et al. Nanofiltration of contaminated water and wastewater using membrane modules reconfigured from commercial spiral-wound elements. Case Stud Chem Environ Eng 2025; 12: 101290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2025.10129010.1016/j.cscee.2025.101290 ↗
22. Karunakaran A Mungray AA Agarwal S Garg MC. Optimization of the forward-osmosis performance with a low-concentration draw solution using response surface modeling. Chem Eng Technol 2021; 44: 1278–1286. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.20200045310.1002/ceat.202000453 ↗
23. Karunakaran A Mungray AA Garg MC. Effects of temperature pH feed and fertilizer draw solution concentrations on the performance of forward osmosis process for textile wastewater treatment. Water Environ Res 2021; 93: 2329–2340. https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.160710.1002/wer.1607 ↗
24. Sahinkaya E Tuncman S Koc I et al. Performance of a pilot-scale reverse osmosis process for water recovery from biologically-treated textile wastewater. J Environ Manag 2019; 249: 109382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.10938210.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109382 ↗
25. Liu M Lü Z Chen Z Yu S Gao C. Comparison of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes in the treatment of biologically treated textile effluent for water reuse. Desalination 2011; 281: 372–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.08.02310.1016/j.desal.2011.08.023 ↗
26. Yin Z Yang C Long C Li A. Effect of integrated pretreatment technologies on RO membrane fouling for treating textile secondary effluent: Laboratory and pilot-scale experiments. Chem Eng J 2018; 332: 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.09.05910.1016/j.cej.2017.09.059 ↗
27. Garg MC Joshi H. Comparative assessment and multivariate optimization of commercially available small scale reverse osmosis membranes. J Environ Inform 2017; 29: 39–52. https://doi.org/10.3808/jei.20170035710.3808/jei.201700357 ↗
28. Jain H Kumar A Verma AK et al. Treatment of textile industry wastewater by using high-performance forward osmosis membrane tailored with alpha-manganese dioxide nanoparticles for fertigation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2022; 29: 80032–80043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20047-x10.1007/s11356-022-20047-x ↗
29. Yasmeen M Nawaz MS Manzoor K Khan SJ Ghaffour N. Evaluating dye recovery and reusability potential from dyebath effluent using forward osmosis membranes for minimum liquid discharge. Chemosphere 2023; 338: 139433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.13943310.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139433 ↗
30. Nandy T Manekar P Dhodapkar R Pophali G Devotta S. Water conservation through implementation of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis system with recourse to recycling of effluent in textile industry–A case study. Resour Conserv Recycl 2007; 51: 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.08.00410.1016/j.resconrec.2006.08.004 ↗
31. Wei C Lao Y Ouyang R et al. Evaluation of different reverse osmosis membranes for textile dyeing and finishing wastewater reuse. Membranes 2023; 13: 420. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes1304042010.3390/membranes13040420 ↗
32. Gharsallaha A Tahria N Duplay J Amar R. Performances of NF and RO applied in combined system and separately for the treatment and recycling of biologically pretreated real textile wastewater. J Phase Change Mater 2022; 2: 24–47. https://hal.science/hal-03797508v1
33. Malik SM Nawaz MS Ali M Manzour K Khan SJ Ghaffour N. Treatment of high-strength synthetic textile wastewater through anaerobic osmotic membrane bioreactor and effect of sludge characteristics on flux. Environ Qual Manag 2021; 31: 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.2175610.1002/tqem.21756 ↗
34. Guvenc SY Varank G Demir A Guven EC. Energy consumption and efficiency improvement of electro-activated persulfate processes: optimization by CCD for TOC removal from leachate concentrate. Sigma J Eng Nat Sci 2020; 38: 1791–1810. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/2010810
35. Tunç Z Tepe O. Application of response surface methodology for heterogeneous catalytic removal of paracetamol by OMS-2/persulfate. Desalin Water Treat 2022; 250: 197–210. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2022.2818410.5004/dwt.2022.28184 ↗
36. Yabalak E. Treatment of agrochemical wastewater by thermally activated persulfate oxidation method: Evaluation of energy and reagent consumption. J Environ Chem Eng 2021; 9: 105201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.10520110.1016/j.jece.2021.105201 ↗
37. Dulova N Kattel E Trapido M. Activated persulfate and hydrogen peroxide treatment of highly contaminated water matrices: A comparative study. IJESD 2020; 11: 549–554. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijesd.2020.11.12.130610.18178/ijesd.2020.11.12.1306 ↗
38. Balcik-Canbolat C Olmez-Hanci T Sengezer C Sakar H Karagunduz A Keskinler B. A combined treatment approach for dye and sulfate rich textile nanofiltration membrane concentrate. J Water Process Eng 2019; 32: 100919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.10091910.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100919 ↗
39. Cipolletta G Lancioni N Akyol Ç Eusebi AL Fatone F. Brine treatment technologies towards minimum/zero liquid discharge and resource recovery: State of the art and techno-economic assessment. J Environ Manag 2021; 300: 113681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.11368110.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113681 ↗
40. Giraldo-Loaiza C Salazar-Loaiza AM Sandoval-Barrera MA Macías-Queiroga IF Ocampo-Serna DM Sanabria-González NR. Integration of ion exchange—AOP—biological system for the treatment of real textile wastewater. ChemEngineering 2024; 8: 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemengineering804007610.3390/chemengineering8040076 ↗
41. Younas K Jamil A Ahmad M Ghaffour N Nawaz MS. Exploring the mechanism of tartrazine dye adsorption by parthenium hysterophorus biochar for sustainable textile wastewater treatment. Int J Environ Sci Technol 2026; 23: 177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-025-06802-w10.1007/s13762-025-06802-w ↗
42. Manzoor K Khan SJ Nawaz MS Ghaffour N. Comparative performance of osmotic and thermal driven anaerobic membrane bioreactors for hazardous textile wastewater treatment. J Water Process Eng 2024; 63: 105568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.10556810.1016/j.jwpe.2024.105568 ↗