journal article·2025-12-27

Development and validation of an FT-IR method for quantitative assessment of immature fiber content in cotton samples

Hee Jin Kim, Yongliang Liu, Christopher D. Delhom, Bugao Xu

Publisher page

Abstract

Within-sample variation in cotton fiber maturity is crucial in the textile industry for predicting and maintaining the quality of end-use products. Accurate and efficient assessments of maturity variation within and among cotton materials are required to improve the quality of yarns and fabrics. Maturity variation is monitored in terms of immature fiber content (IFC) by a reference microscopy method requiring slow processes and extra cost of analyzing individual fiber properties. Attenuated total reflection (ATR) Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy has been proposed as a rapid alternative for monitoring cotton fiber maturity, based on its capacity to differentiate chemical characteristics between mature and immature fibers. Conventional FT-IR method analyzing the spectra by multivariate data analyses lacked the ability to provide quantitative IFC values. Thus, a novel FT-IR algorithm was developed to overcome the limitation of conventional FT-IR methods. This algorithm utilizes spectral regions responsive to the chemical components in immature fibers and formulates a metric denoted as the infrared immaturity ratio (IIR). The efficacy of the IIR algorithm was demonstrated by comparing its performance with the reference microscopy method. It allowed for the quantitative differentiation of a broad range of IFC values (1.50–45.17%) tested from the reference and experimental cotton materials. The newly developed algorithm offers a quantitative, rapid, and noninvasive approach to monitoring maturity variation within and among cotton samples.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Research in Cotton Cultivation · Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Cotton Fiber Bioscience and Utilization Research Unit, USDA-ARS-SRRC, New Orleans, LA, USA

Cotton Quality and Innovation Research Unit, USDA-ARS-SRRC, New Orleans, LA, USA

Sustainable Water Management Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Stoneville, MS, USA

Department of Merchandising and Digital Retailing, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Frydrych I, Thibodeaux DP. Fiber quality evaluation-current and future trends/ intrinsic value of fiber quality in cotton. In: Wakelyn PJ, Chaudhry MR (eds.), Cotton: Technology for the 21st Century. Washington DC: International Cotton Advisory Committee, 2010, pp. 251–296.
2. 10.1007/978-3-030-00871-0_210.1007/978-3-030-00871-0_2 ↗
3. 10.1104/pp.01072410.1104/pp.010724 ↗
4. Pierce F, Lord E. The fineness and maturity of cotton. J Text Inst Trans 1939; 30: T173-T210.
5. 10.1177/00405175860560021110.1177/004051758605600211 ↗
6. Gordon S, Rodgers J. Cotton fibre cross-section properties. In: Gordon S, Abidi N (eds.) Cotton Fibres, Characteristics, Uses and Performance. New York: Nova Science, 2017, pp. 65-86.
7. 10.2134/agronmonogr57.2013.003110.2134/agronmonogr57.2013.0031 ↗
8. 10.2134/agronmonogr57.2013.002410.2134/agronmonogr57.2013.0024 ↗
9. 10.1177/004051751452737510.1177/0040517514527375 ↗
10. 10.1007/s10570-021-04135-810.1007/s10570-021-04135-8 ↗
11. 10.1080/00405000.2023.220446010.1080/00405000.2023.2204460 ↗
12. Kretzschmar SD Furter R. USTER® AFIS PRO 2 Application Report: A new single fiber testing system for the process control in spinning mills. Switzerland 2008.
13. 10.1177/00405175880580110310.1177/004051758805801103 ↗
14. 10.1177/004051750934378410.1177/0040517509343784 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.12.04110.1016/j.indcrop.2012.12.041 ↗
16. 10.1007/978-3-030-00871-0_310.1007/978-3-030-00871-0_3 ↗
17. Montalvo JGJ. Relationships between micronaire, fineness, and maturity. Part I. Fundamentals. J Cotton Sci 2005; 9: 81-88.
18. 10.1255/jnirs.4510.1255/jnirs.45 ↗
19. 10.1177/004051750934378010.1177/0040517509343780 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.07410.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.074 ↗
21. 10.1366/15-0787610.1366/15-07876 ↗
22. 10.3390/s1707146910.3390/s17071469 ↗
23. Van der Sluijs MH. Cotton appearance. Cotton Fibers: Characteristics, Uses and Performance. New York: Nova Science, 2017, pp. 135-158.
24. 10.1007/s10570-009-9366-110.1007/s10570-009-9366-1 ↗
25. 10.1177/004051751141010710.1177/0040517511410107 ↗
26. 10.1177/000370281881817110.1177/0003702818818171 ↗
27. 10.1186/s42397-019-0027-010.1186/s42397-019-0027-0 ↗
28. 10.1177/004051750606471010.1177/0040517506064710 ↗
29. 10.2135/cropsci2018.05.032410.2135/cropsci2018.05.0324 ↗
30. 10.1186/1471-2164-14-88910.1186/1471-2164-14-889 ↗
31. 10.1007/s10570-019-02502-010.1007/s10570-019-02502-0 ↗
32. 10.1002/csc2.2019710.1002/csc2.20197 ↗
33. 10.1177/00405175930630020310.1177/004051759306300203 ↗
34. 10.1207/s15327906mbr2403_610.1207/s15327906mbr2403_6 ↗
35. 10.1198/sbr.2009.002510.1198/sbr.2009.0025 ↗
36. 10.1177/0040517524123539810.1177/00405175241235398 ↗
37. 10.5194/gmd-7-1247-201410.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014 ↗
38. Zar JH. Biostatistical Analysis (4th edn). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 1999.
39. 10.1177/004051751453003110.1177/0040517514530031 ↗
40. 10.1186/s12864-021-07504-610.1186/s12864-021-07504-6 ↗
41. 10.1177/004051750708067410.1177/0040517507080674 ↗
42. 10.1177/00405175040740050710.1177/004051750407400507 ↗
43. Anthony WS, Clapp DM, Drieling A, et al. Cotton value addition. In: Estur G, Knappe M (eds) Cotton Exporter’s Guide. Geneva, Switzerland: International Trade Centre UNCTAD/WTO, 2007, pp. 35-91.
44. 10.2134/agronj2017.06.035910.2134/agronj2017.06.0359 ↗
45. 10.3390/s2409288810.3390/s24092888 ↗