A quantitative assessment of seam strength and efficiency across various seam types in shoe upper leathers
Source abstract
Abstract
In shoe manufacturing, needle holes left on leather after seams are opened or removed, either during production or subsequent use, render the leather unsuitable for reuse. This issue leads to considerable waste of expensive raw materials, increased production costs, and adverse effects on sustainability in the leather industry. Addressing this challenge is crucial to improving both manufacturing efficiency and environmental sustainability. This study investigates the influence of four commonly used seam types, lapped seams (LSa and LSb) and superimposed seams (Ssa-Closed and Ssa-Open), on the seam strength and efficiency of upper leathers used in shoe production. The choice of seam type significantly affects the mechanical performance, durability, and overall quality of the final product. Experimental testing revealed that the lapped seam (LSa) exhibited superior durability when applied to upper leather. Moreover, statistically significant differences were identified among the tested seam types, underscoring the critical role of seam selection in optimizing product integrity and longevity. By selecting seam types based on their mechanical properties, manufacturers can enhance product durability, reduce material waste, and promote sustainability. The findings of this study provide valuable insights for improving the efficiency and environmental impact of leather product manufacturing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Collagen: Extraction and Characterization · Occupational exposure and asthma · Materials Engineering and Processing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Leather Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, Ege University, Izmir, Türkiye
Funding
Ege Üniversitesi
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.31881/TLR.2020.2010.31881/TLR.2020.20 ↗
2. Bitlisli BO, Karavana HA, Basaran B, Aslan A. Importance of using genuine leather in shoe production in terms of foot comfort. J Soc Leather Technol Chem 2005; 89(3): 107–110.
3. Mutlu MM, Ork N, Kaya B, Gunesel S. Determination and mapping of tear load, tensile strength and extension values on overall area of goatskin leathers. In: 6th International Conference on Advanced Materials and Systems (ICAMS 2016), Bucharest, Romania, 2016.
4. Ahmadi MS, Rahimi S. Effect of base cloth structure on seam strength and seam efficiency of artificial leather. In: 18th AUTEX World Textile Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, 2018.
5. 10.5772/intechopen.8643610.5772/intechopen.86436 ↗
6. 10.1016/B978-1-78242-232-7.00010-210.1016/B978-1-78242-232-7.00010-2 ↗
7. Akter M, Khan MR. The effect of stitch types and sewing thread types on seam strength for cotton apparel. Int J Sci Eng Res 2015; 6(7): 198–205.
8. 10.1007/s12221-021-0519-710.1007/s12221-021-0519-7 ↗
9. 10.7216/130075992019261150610.7216/1300759920192611506 ↗
10. Woynshet G, Kavati P, Palanisamy T, Krishnaraj K, Bangaru C. Influence of sewing threads on seam pucker of sheep nappa leathers. J Am Leather Chem Assoc 2014; 98(4): 158–162.
11. 10.1007/s12221-014-1766-710.1007/s12221-014-1766-7 ↗
12. Glock RE, Kunz GI. Apparel Manufacturing: Sewn Product Analysis (2nd edn). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1995.
13. Carr H, Lutham B. The Technology of Clothing Manufacture. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1991.
14. 10.32710/tekstilvekonfeksiyon.113763510.32710/tekstilvekonfeksiyon.1137635 ↗
15. 10.1080/00405000.2014.89907910.1080/00405000.2014.899079 ↗
16. 10.1080/00405000.2017.131267710.1080/00405000.2017.1312677 ↗
17. Pamuk O, Kurtoglu O, Tama D, Ondogan Z. Sewability properties of lining fabrics. Tekst ve Konfeksiyon 2011; 21(3): 301–304.
18. 10.32710/tekstilvekonfeksiyon.108804310.32710/tekstilvekonfeksiyon.1088043 ↗
19. 10.1007/s12221-017-1026-810.1007/s12221-017-1026-8 ↗
20. 10.1007/s12221-011-1099-810.1007/s12221-011-1099-8 ↗
21. 10.1007/s12221-012-1086-810.1007/s12221-012-1086-8 ↗
22. 10.1108/RJTA-08-2017-004110.1108/RJTA-08-2017-0041 ↗
23. Glock RE, Kunz GI. Apparel Manufacturing Sewn Product Analysis (2nd edn). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1995.
24. 10.1177/0040517524123321510.1177/00405175241233215 ↗
25. 10.1080/00405000.2024.235458010.1080/00405000.2024.2354580 ↗
26. 10.1108/IJCST-03-2016-002810.1108/IJCST-03-2016-0028 ↗
27. 10.1108/IJCST-12-2015-013310.1108/IJCST-12-2015-0133 ↗
28. Bansal P, Sikka M, Choudhary AK. Seam performance of knitted fabrics based on seam strength and seam efficiency. Indian J Fibre Text Res 2021; 46: 22-28.
29. 10.1680/jgein.15.0002110.1680/jgein.15.00021 ↗
30. 10.1108/RJTA-18-02-2014-B00710.1108/RJTA-18-02-2014-B007 ↗
31. Kavati P, Palanisamy T, Krishnaraj K, Bangaru C. Factors influencing the seam efficiency of goat nappa leathers. J Am Leather Chem Assoc 2012; 107(3): 78–84.
32. Kavati P, Palanisamy T, Krishnaraj K, Bangaru C. Influence of mechanical properties of sheep nappa leathers on seam efficiency. J Soc Leather Technol Chem 2011; 95(1): 16–22.
33. 10.14504/ajr.1.6.210.14504/ajr.1.6.2 ↗
34. 10.1177/004051750708263610.1177/0040517507082636 ↗
35. Case J, Chilver L, Ross CTF. Strength of Materials and Structures (4th edn). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1999.
36. Roylance D. Stress-Strain Curves. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001.
37. United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO). Acceptable Quality Standards in the Leather and Footwear Industry. Vienna, Austria: UNIDO, 1996.
38. 10.9790/9622-100203556310.9790/9622-1002035563 ↗
39. Bonham NJ, Burt WJ, Hughes T, Loader C, Page EJ, Dunthorn KC. Cutting. In: Miller RG, Redwood SR (eds.), Manual of Shoemaking. Street, Somerset: Clarks Ltd. Printing Department, 1976; pp. 91–112.
40. 10.1080/00405000.2011.60350910.1080/00405000.2011.603509 ↗