Objective evaluation of the resistance of fabric to wetting using image processing techniques
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, in accordance with the basic principle of the water repellency test, images of visually evaluated samples were captured, and the wetted areas were numerically calculated using image processing techniques. Water repellent finishes were applied to different types of fabrics at varying concentrations, resulting in 102 samples with different water repellent properties. After the spray test, the sample images were compared with ISO shower test rating cards by 10 expert observers. In addition, the wetted areas of the samples were determined as percentages using image classification techniques with ERDAS 8.4 software. Kendall’s W test demonstrated a high level of agreement among the observers ( W = 0.882). A strong negative correlation ( r = −0.908) was found between objective and subjective data, as the evaluation rating decreases with increasing wetted area according to ISO shower test rating cards. This confirms that the objective evaluations closely align with the subjective measurements.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Textile, Apparel, Footwear and Leather Department, Vocational School of Technical Sciences, Cukurova University, Adana Organized Industrial Zone, Cukurova, Turkey
Architecture and Urban Planning Department, Vocational School of Technical Sciences, Cukurova University, Adana Organized Industrial Zone, Cukurova, Turkey
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.4236/jtst.2018.4300610.4236/jtst.2018.43006 ↗
2. Mete G. Improvement of water-oil repellency and flame retardancy properties of cotton fabric by using sol-gel process. Master Thesis University of Pamukkale Turkey 2013.
3. Fahmy H, Hassabo A. Synthesis and application of new silicone based water repellents. Egypt J Chem 2022; 65(2): 499–507.
4. Kıyak YE, Cakmak E. Pamuk elyafı yüzeyine uygulanan su itici aprenin kumaş performansına etkileri. Electron J Vehicle Technol 2014; 8(2):63.
5. 10.3390/polym1619279010.3390/polym16192790 ↗
6. 10.3390/ma1511382510.3390/ma15113825 ↗
7. ISO 4920:2012. Textile fabrics determination of resistance to water penetration hydrostatic pressure test Textiles determination of resistance to surface wetting (spray test) of fabrics.
8. Hassabo AG, Elmorsy H, Gamal N, et al. Applications of nanotechnology in the creation of smart sportswear for enhanced sports performance: Efficiency and comfort. J Text Colorat Polym Sci 2023; 20(1): 11–28.
9. 10.5604/01.3001.0012.131510.5604/01.3001.0012.1315 ↗
10. 10.2478/s13531-011-0045-210.2478/s13531-011-0045-2 ↗
11. 10.3390/ma1704078310.3390/ma17040783 ↗
12. 10.1007/s11665-015-1624-910.1007/s11665-015-1624-9 ↗
13. Lee F Ryntz RA Britz D et al. Analysis of coatings appearance and durability testing induced surface defects using image capture/processing/analysis. SAE Technical Paper No. 2001-01-3798 2001.10.4271/2001-01-3798 ↗
14. 10.1007/s00138-012-0411-y10.1007/s00138-012-0411-y ↗
15. 10.1177/004051751140212310.1177/0040517511402123 ↗
16. 10.1177/004051751880538710.1177/0040517518805387 ↗
17. 10.3390/app918379110.3390/app9183791 ↗
18. 10.1177/004051750910447110.1177/0040517509104471 ↗
19. 10.5604/12303666.119142410.5604/12303666.1191424 ↗
20. 10.1007/s11671-007-9093-110.1007/s11671-007-9093-1 ↗
21. 10.1155/2014/73849010.1155/2014/738490 ↗
22. 10.1186/s40691-023-00346-810.1186/s40691-023-00346-8 ↗
23. 10.1177/004051751142661510.1177/0040517511426615 ↗
24. 10.1088/2053-1591/aba3e410.1088/2053-1591/aba3e4 ↗
25. 10.5604/12303666.120784510.5604/12303666.1207845 ↗
26. 10.1080/00405000.2023.228526210.1080/00405000.2023.2285262 ↗
27. 10.1007/BF0287560910.1007/BF02875609 ↗
28. 10.3993/jfbi0920100510.3993/jfbi09201005 ↗
29. Memariani F, Ekhtiari E. Study on wicking measurement in thin layer textiles by processing digital images. Int J Eng 2010; 23(1): 101–108.
30. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.02.04010.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.02.040 ↗
31. 10.1080/15440478.2023.228633110.1080/15440478.2023.2286331 ↗
32. 10.1080/00405000.2015.102708110.1080/00405000.2015.1027081 ↗
33. 10.5296/wjbm.v1i1.788310.5296/wjbm.v1i1.7883 ↗