Effect of structure of wool/nylon spun yarn on warp knittability and fabric performance
Source abstract
Abstract
This study was an investigation of the knittability of wool/nylon yarns subjected to stretching, bending, and friction during the warp knitting process and the anti-pilling performance of the resulting knitted fabrics. Wool/nylon compact spun yarn, core-spun yarn, and Sirofil spun yarn were prepared with the same wool/nylon ratio, of 70/30. The abrasion resistance and mechanical and bending properties were measured to evaluate the knittability of wool/nylon yarns, and the hairiness of the yarns and the pilling performance of the fabrics produced were also examined. In addition, the mechanical property, bending rigidity, and air and moisture permeability of the fabrics were measured. The Sirofil spun yarn demonstrated superior performance in terms of abrasion resistance (377×), breaking strength (202.10 cN), and hook-joint strength (178.45 cN), which were all significantly higher than for compact and core-spun yarns. Sirofil spun yarn had the best knittability of the three yarns; the pilling grade of the fabric produced by Sirofil spun yarn and after soft finishing was 3 for 7000 abrasion cycles, and the warp breaking strength of fabric produced by Sirofil spun yarn after the soft finishing was 593.53 N. The moisture permeability of the fabric produced by Sirofil spun yarn and after smooth finishing was 339.93 g/m 2 ·h. It was concluded that the Sirofil spun yarn was more suitable for warp knitting than compact spun yarn or core-spun yarn.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Jiangnan University College of Textile Science and Engineering, Engineering Research Center of Knitting Technology, China
Inner Mongolia Erdos Resources Co., Ltd., China
Funding
Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Science and Technology Plan Project · Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/00405000.2016.126998010.1080/00405000.2016.1269980 ↗
2. 10.1080/15440478.2022.213169010.1080/15440478.2022.2131690 ↗
3. 10.1177/004051751668196310.1177/0040517516681963 ↗
4. 10.1007/BF0290827110.1007/BF02908271 ↗
5. 10.1002/jemt.2288110.1002/jemt.22881 ↗
6. 10.1177/004051751141497310.1177/0040517511414973 ↗
7. 10.1080/15440478.2021.193266810.1080/15440478.2021.1932668 ↗
8. 10.1080/15440478.2023.221292510.1080/15440478.2023.2212925 ↗
9. 10.1177/004051751456611210.1177/0040517514566112 ↗
10. Kumar K, Das A, Vishnoi P, et al. Moisture management properties and drying behaviour of knitted fabrics for inner layer applications. Indian J Fibre Text Res 2023; 481: 91–98.
11. Czaplicki Z, Mikolajczyk Z, , andPrazynska A. Analysis of functional properties of knitted fabrics made of alpaca wool and other fibres. Fibres Text East Eur 2018; 263: 52–59.
12. Kyzymchuk O, Melnyk L, Marmaralı A, et al. The effect of weft yarn type and elastomer yarn threading on the properties of elastic warp knitted fabrics. Part 1: Structure and elasticity. J Eng Fibers Fabr. Epub ahead of print 25 April 2023. DOI: 10.1177/15589250231167405.
13. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e0956210.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09562 ↗
14. 10.1177/152808370708379210.1177/1528083707083792 ↗
15. Yang RH, Wu WM, Wang HB, et al. Effects of solospun roller on properties of cotton/polyester solo-Sirofil composite yarn. J Eng Fibers Fabr 2012; 7: 98–102.
16. Ma Q, Liu XF. Test and analysis of compact-spun-yarn fabric. J Text Res 2011; 32: 67–69.
17. 10.1533/joti.2005.013510.1533/joti.2005.0135 ↗
18. GB/T 3916-2013. Textiles. Yarns from packages. Determination of single-end breaking force and elongation at break using constant rate of extension (CRE) tester.
19. GB/T 14344-2008. Testing method for tensile of man-made filament yarns.
20. FZ/T 01058–1999. Test method for abrasion resistance of yarns. Reciprocating rubbing roller method.
21. FZ/T 01086-2020. Textiles. Test method for yarn hairness. Projection counting method.
22. ASTM D1425/D1425M-14:2020. Standard test method for evenness of textile strands using capacitance testing equipment.
23. GB/T 4802.2-2008. Textiles. Determination of fabric propensity to surface fuzzing and to pilling. Part 2: Modified Martindale method.
24. EN ISO 12945-1:2020. Textiles. Determination of fabric propensity to surface pilling fuzzing or matting. Part 1: Pilling box method.
25. GB/T 3923-2013. Textiles. Tensile properties of fabrics. Part 1: Determination of maximum force and elongation at maximum force using the strip method.
26. GB/T 18318.1-2009. Textiles. Determination of bending behaviour. Part 1: Incline method.
27. GB/T 5453-1997. Textiles. Determination of the permeability of fabrics to air.
28. GB/T 12704.1-2009. Textiles. Test method for water-vapour transmission of fabrics. Part 1: Desiccant method.
29. 10.1080/15440478.2022.206817310.1080/15440478.2022.2068173 ↗
30. 10.3390/polym1614205210.3390/polym16142052 ↗
31. Tiritoğlu M, Kavusturan Y. Investigation of abrasion resistance and bursting strength of warp knitted raschel fabrics. Text Apparel 2017; 27: 182–190.
32. Anas MS, Abbas A, Awais H, et al. A study on the effect of material type, structure tightness and finishing process on the physical and thermo-physiological properties of sandwich terry socks for winter wear. J Eng Fibers Fabr. Epub ahead of print 8 February 2023. DOI: 10.1177/15589250231153398.
33. Mikučionienė D. The influence of structure parameters of weft knitted fabrics on propensity to pilling. Mater Sci Medzg 2009; 15: 335–338.
34. Busilienė G, Lekeckas K, , andUrbelis V. Pilling resistance of knitted fabrics. Mater Sci Medzg 2011; 17: 297–301.
35. 10.1080/15440478.2022.202598210.1080/15440478.2022.2025982 ↗