journal article·2026-04

Age-specific preferences for sizing information in online athleisure shopping: Meeting the evolving needs of South Korean women in their 20s to 50s

Eui Kyung Roh

Textile Research Journal· Volume 96· Issue 7-8
Publisher page

Abstract

This study is an examination of the essential sizing and reference information required by women aged in their 20s to 50s when shopping for athleisure wear online. It is focused on the sizing information that is deemed important by women in this age group, taking into account their age and consumer needs related to size. As our bodies change over time, it becomes increasingly important to have accurate age-specific sizing information when shopping online, especially in the athleisure market, where fit is crucial. In this analysis, it was found that while all age groups prioritize detailed sizing and reference size information, there are differences in their preferences based on age. Younger consumers, particularly those in their 20s and 30s, are most concerned with hip circumference, while women in their 40s and 50s prioritize abdomen measurements, owing to changes in body composition. Additionally, middle-aged groups are more interested in sizing information to reduce the likelihood of returns. These findings highlight the importance of providing accurate age-specific sizing information to build consumer trust, increase brand satisfaction, and reduce return rates. Overall, this study highlights the importance of a personalized approach in online athleisure retail, where accurate sizing information can meet the evolving needs of varying age groups and result in a more satisfying shopping experience.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior · Consumer Retail Behavior Studies · Diverse Topics in Contemporary Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Research Institute of Human Ecology, Jeonbuk National University, South Korea

Funding

Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.5805/SFTI.2023.25.2.16510.5805/SFTI.2023.25.2.165 ↗
2. 10.5805/SFTI.2021.23.3.37010.5805/SFTI.2021.23.3.370 ↗
3. An EJ. A study on athleisure fashion tendency and consumer behavior according to COVID-19 pandemic. Korean Soc Des Cult 2022; 28(1): 239–249.
4. Zheng S. The true cost of apparel returns: Alarming return rates require loss-minimization solutions. Coresight Research. https://coresight.com/research/the-true-cost-of-apparel-returns-alarming-return-rates-require-loss-minimization-solutions/ (2025 accessed 14 January 2025).
5. Kim GA, Kim CK, , andKim MJ. An analysis of the problem for providing product information in internet shopping mall. Korean Fashion Text Res J 2013; 38: 387–397.
6. Lazim NAM Sulaiman Z Zakuan N et al. Measuring post-purchase regret and impulse buying in online shopping experience from cognitive dissonance theory perspective. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on information management London UK 27–29 March 2020 pp. 7–13. Piscataway NJ: IEEE.10.1109/ICIM49319.2020.244662 ↗
7. 10.5805/SFTI.2024.26.1.2510.5805/SFTI.2024.26.1.25 ↗
8. 10.7233/jksc.2013.63.3.09510.7233/jksc.2013.63.3.095 ↗
9. Park JH, Lee AL. The sizing communications of menswear on retail websites. J Korean Soc Clothing Text 2023; 47(1): 73–84.
10. 10.5805/SFTI.2022.24.1.11710.5805/SFTI.2022.24.1.117 ↗
11. Jeong HY. Analysis of the current state of clothing size systems in children’s clothing online shopping malls. J Korea Fashion Costume Des Assoc 2022; 24(3): 145–158.
12. Nestler A Karessli N Hajjar K et al. Sizeflags: Reducing size and fit-related returns in fashion e-commerce. KDD ’21: Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery & data mining Singapore 14–18 August 2021 pp. 3432–3440. New York NY: Association for Computing Machinery.10.1145/3447548.3467160 ↗
13. Mohammed Abdulla G Singh S andBorar S. Shop your right size: A system for recommending sizes for fashion products. Companion proceedings of the 2019 world wide web conference San Francisco CA USA 13 May 2019 pp. 327–334. New York NY: Association for Computing Machinery.10.1145/3308560.3316599 ↗
14. Sheikh AS Guigourès R Koriagin E et al. A deep learning system for predicting size and fit in fashion e-commerce. RecSys '19: Proceedings of the 13th ACM conference on recommender systems Copenhagen Denmark 16–20 September 2019 pp. 110–118. New York NY: Association for Computing Machinery.10.1145/3298689.3347006 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.10.00910.1016/j.bodyim.2019.10.009 ↗
16. Grand View Research. Athleisure market size share & trend analysis report by product (yoga apparel leggings) by category by end-user (men women children) by distribution channel by region and segment forecasts 2024–2030. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/athleisure-market (2024 accessed 13 January 2025).
17. 10.1177/00222437720090010510.1177/002224377200900105 ↗
18. 10.1108/IJPDLM-10-2019-030210.1108/IJPDLM-10-2019-0302 ↗
19. Kim YE. Influence of attitudes toward online fashion shopping mall models on shopping emotion and advertising effects. Master’s Thesis Hanyang University South Korea 2013.
20. 10.1207/s15327663jcp1601_1010.1207/s15327663jcp1601_10 ↗
21. 10.5805/SFTI.2020.22.5.61710.5805/SFTI.2020.22.5.617 ↗
22. Adidas. Adidas. https://www.adidas.co.kr/ (accessed 21 March 2021).
23. Andar. Andar. https://andar.co.kr/ (accessed 21 March 2021).
24. Mulawear. Mulawear. https://www.mulawear.com/ (accessed 21 March 2021).
25. Nike. Nike. https://www.nike.com/kr (accessed 21 March 2021).
26. Xexymix. Xexymix. https://www.xexymix.com/ (accessed 21 March 2021).
27. Chazan D. Photoshopped images to come with a warning under new French law. The Telegraph 1 October 2017. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/30/photoshopped-images-come-warning-new-french-law/ (2017 accessed 2 November 2024).
28. 10.1108/1361202101104609310.1108/13612021011046093 ↗
29. Size Korea–Korean Agency for Technology and Standards. 7th human body size data. https://sizekorea.kr/support/pds (accessed 21 March 2021).
30. KSK0051:2019. Sizing systems for female adult’s garments.
31. 10.1080/02650487.2020.182205910.1080/02650487.2020.1822059 ↗
32. 10.1007/s11747-024-01034-910.1007/s11747-024-01034-9 ↗
33. 10.1080/20932685.2017.139908310.1080/20932685.2017.1399083 ↗
34. 10.1177/0887302X1349312710.1177/0887302X13493127 ↗
35. Rieke SE, Fowler DC, Chang HJ, et al. Exploration of factors influencing body image satisfaction and purchase intent: Millennial females. J Fash Mark Manag 2016; 20(2): 208–229
36. 10.1108/AJIM-05-2021-014410.1108/AJIM-05-2021-0144 ↗
37. 10.1108/IJCS-10-2019-002710.1108/IJCS-10-2019-0027 ↗
38. 10.5805/SFTI.2018.20.5.55610.5805/SFTI.2018.20.5.556 ↗
39. Lee JE, Choi SL, , andDo WH. A study on the wearing condition of athleisure wear of Korean women in their 20’s. Korean Fashion Text Res J 2017; 19(5): 579–588.
40. Solove DJ. Understanding privacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2010.
41. 10.5850/JKSCT.2008.32.8.119010.5850/JKSCT.2008.32.8.1190 ↗
42. Koo HK. Analysis of preferences based on purchasing frequencies and recognitions of sizing systems for female garments. J Korea Fashion Costume Des Assoc 2011; 13(1): 125–134.
43. 10.5805/SFTI.2017.19.1.4910.5805/SFTI.2017.19.1.49 ↗
44. 10.1108/JFMM-12-2018-016510.1108/JFMM-12-2018-0165 ↗
45. Choi YK. Shape classification of body type on adult females and its variation of size and shape according to their age. PhD Thesis Seoul National University South Korea 1997.
46. Kwon SH. A study on somatotypes of 18–54-year-old females. Hum Ecol Res 1998; 36(5): 17–27.
47. Szulc R, Musielak K. Product photography in product attractiveness perception and e-commerce customer purchase decisions. Sci Pap Sil Univ Technol Series Organ Manag 2022; 166: 783–796.
48. 10.1080/02650487.2022.216483510.1080/02650487.2022.2164835 ↗