journal article·2026-03

Development of lifting-assistive passive functional pants for construction works

Jin Zhi Chen, Jeong Eun Yoon, Zi Ying Liu, Sung Kyu Lee, Sumin Helen Koo

Textile Research Journal· Volume 96· Issue 5-6
Publisher page

Abstract

Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are common among construction workers, mainly due to the effects of repetitive semi-squatting and weightlifting operations on lower limb health. To address the challenges associated with existing wearable devices, such as their bulkiness and limited mobility, this study aims to develop passive functional pants (PFPs) that use elastic straps for lifting assistance. The effectiveness of these PFPs in reducing muscle strain during semi-squat weightlifting tasks was evaluated through questionnaires and electromyography (EMG) experiments involving 32 healthy male participants. The results showed a decrease in the activity levels of the biceps femoris and rectus femoris muscles during weightlifting when participants wore the PFPs. A practical survey indicated satisfaction regarding the comfort, safety, and functionality of PFPs. In addition, it was noted that PFPs can enhance productivity while reducing the risk of MSDs. This study offers a lightweight, cost-effective, and practical solution for improving occupational health in the construction industry by developing PFPs that enhance wearability, comfort, and usability, thereby alleviating the economic burden associated with work-related MSDs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ergonomics and Human Factors · Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Yonsei University

Department of Fashion Design, Konkuk University, Chungju, South Korea

Funding

This research was supported by the

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.4103/0019-5278.20313410.4103/0019-5278.203134 ↗
2. 10.1016/0003-6870(95)00078-X10.1016/0003-6870(95)00078-X ↗
3. Purani R, Shah N, Sharma S. Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders in construction workers in Gujarat: a cross-sectional survey. Int J Ther Rehabil Res 2016; 6: 52.
4. Bashir F, Afzal MW, Ahmed A, et al. Frequency of work related musculoskeletal disorders of lower extremity among construction workers. Therapist 2020; 1(1): 12–15.
5. 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.10538210.1016/j.ssci.2021.105382 ↗
6. 10.1080/24725838.2018.156155710.1080/24725838.2018.1561557 ↗
7. 10.1186/s40691-019-0194-010.1186/s40691-019-0194-0 ↗
8. 10.5143/JESK.2010.29.3.32110.5143/JESK.2010.29.3.321 ↗
9. 10.3233/WOR-18271310.3233/WOR-182713 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.08.35310.1016/j.apmr.2016.08.353 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.10349310.1016/j.autcon.2020.103493 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2019.10227210.1016/j.mechatronics.2019.102272 ↗
13. 10.7736/JKSPE.021.03710.7736/JKSPE.021.037 ↗
14. UK Health and Safety Executive. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders statistics in Great Britain. https://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/causdis/ (2022 accessed April 2025).
15. PSJ Staff. Musculoskeletal disorders top ill-health issues in construction https://projectsafetyjournal.com/musculoskeletal-disorders-top-ill-health-issues-in-construction/ (2022 accessed 7 May 2023).
16. 10.1136/oemed-2016-10394310.1136/oemed-2016-103943 ↗
17. 10.3390/ijerph1312123210.3390/ijerph13121232 ↗
18. 10.5935/rpot/2021.3.2032110.5935/rpot/2021.3.20321 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.aap.2011.03.01710.1016/j.aap.2011.03.017 ↗
20. Deros BM, Daruis DD, Khamis NK, et al. Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorder symptoms among construction workers: a case study in Malaysia. Iran J Public Health 2014; 43: 403–407.
21. 10.3390/ijerph2005465310.3390/ijerph20054653 ↗
22. 10.1186/1471-2474-13-19610.1186/1471-2474-13-196 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.10315610.1016/j.apergo.2020.103156 ↗
24. 10.1177/001872082090775210.1177/0018720820907752 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.bbe.2020.12.01010.1016/j.bbe.2020.12.010 ↗
26. 10.1080/00140139.2015.108198810.1080/00140139.2015.1081988 ↗
27. 10.3390/act1007016610.3390/act10070166 ↗
28. RoboticsBiz Editorial. Active against passive exoskeletons explained https://roboticsbiz.com/active-vs-passive-exoskeletons-explained/ (2021 accessed April 2025).
29. Chiaradia D, Xiloyannis M, Solazzi M, et al. Comparison of a soft exosuit and a rigid exoskeleton in an assistive task. Biosyst Biorobot 2018; 415–419.
30. Xing L Wang M Zhang J et al. A survey on flexible exoskeleton robot. In: IEEE Information Technology Networking Electronic and Automation Control Conference (ITNEC). Chongqing: IEEE 2020 pp. 170–174.10.1109/ITNEC48623.2020.9084920 ↗
31. 10.20965/jrm.2020.p020910.20965/jrm.2020.p0209 ↗
32. European Textile Services Association. ETSA requirements for workwear garments https://www.textile-services.eu/_common/file.cfm?id=210F1C1DD8A031A7DC8AB5563F47D80A (PDF download) (2016 accessed April 2025).
33. US Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employed persons by detailed industry and age https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat18b.htm (2023 accessed April 2025).
34. Construction Employer Association. Construction worker demographics in the U.S. https://www.ceacisp.org/news/construction-worker-demographics-us (2023 accessed 27 June 2024).
35. 10.1214/aoms/117770514810.1214/aoms/1177705148 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.04.00710.1016/j.apergo.2018.04.007 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.12.00310.1016/j.apergo.2015.12.003 ↗
38. 10.3390/ijerph1913808810.3390/ijerph19138088 ↗
39. US Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Requirements Survey. Strength levels https://www.bls.gov/ors/factsheet/strength.htm (accessed April 2025).
40. Pi X, Chen F, Peng C. Methods applied to muscle fatigue assessment using surface myoelectric signals. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi 2006; 23: 225–229.
41. 10.1186/1471-2474-10-1510.1186/1471-2474-10-15 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jelekin.2022.10273910.1016/j.jelekin.2022.102739 ↗
43. 10.3390/nursrep1302006810.3390/nursrep13020068 ↗
44. 10.1017/wtc.2022.2010.1017/wtc.2022.20 ↗
45. 10.1177/0887302X900080020610.1177/0887302X9000800206 ↗
46. 10.1177/073168440808004610.1177/0731684408080046 ↗
47. 10.1108/0955622971015787610.1108/09556229710157876 ↗
48. 10.1177/00405175860560080110.1177/004051758605600801 ↗
49. 10.1177/0887302X1878358010.1177/0887302X18783580 ↗
50. 10.1177/0040517522114354310.1177/00405175221143543 ↗
51. 10.1109/LRA.2022.319488310.1109/LRA.2022.3194883 ↗
52. 10.1126/scirobotics.abe124310.1126/scirobotics.abe1243 ↗
53. 10.1109/TBME.2017.276145510.1109/TBME.2017.2761455 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.05.00310.1016/j.jelekin.2019.05.003 ↗