Preparation and properties of antimicrobial polyurethane fibers based on α-ZrP and their durability in sports fabrics
Source abstract
Abstract
To investigate the antimicrobial sports fabrics with good durability, silver ions antibacterial polyurethane fiber (Ag + PUF), chitosan/silver ions antimicrobial polyurethane fiber (CS/Ag + PUF) and quaternary ammonium salts/silver ions polyurethane fiber (QAS/Ag + PUF) were prepared. To protect the main body of antibacterial polyurethane fibers (ABPUFs) from oxidative discoloration under the influence of Ag + , the antimicrobial agent was first assembled with α-ZrP and then spun after being mixed into a polyurethane solution. In addition, nine fabric samples with different ABPUF contents (7%, 8%, 9%, 17%, 18%, and 19%) were prepared. The antibacterial properties of fibers and fabrics of Ag + PUF, CS/Ag + PUF, and QAS/Ag + PUF were characterized comprehensively and the relationship between the intrinsic antimicrobial properties of fibers and their chemical structure was demonstrated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and thermogravimetric analysis. In addition, the mechanical properties of the fibers and air and moisture permeability of the fabrics were tested. The inhibition rates against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus of ABPUF and its fabrics exceeded 99.99%. ABPUF maintained an antimicrobial rate of over 98% after soaking in acetic acid solution at pH 3, 95°C for 45 min. It was demonstrated that the antibacterial rate of the fabrics prepared with Ag + PUF, CS/Ag + PUF, and QAS/Ag + PUF was reduced by 0.24–5.4% after 2000 rubbing revolutions and by 6.99–40.47% after laundering 50 times. SEM, FTIR spectroscopy, XRD, and DSC analysis confirmed the presence of antimicrobial agents in the fibers. Mechanical properties proved that the elongation at break of ABPUF was 12.6%, 2.4%, and 1.5% less than that of PUF, respectively. In summary, ABPUF maintained excellent antimicrobial properties and durability and could be used in sports fabrics. A fuzzy mathematics comprehensive evaluation indicated that the comprehensive performance of fabric prepared by 44.4 dtex Ag + PUF with 2 + 2 mesh structure is the best.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Antimicrobial agents and applications · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Engineering Research Center of Knitting Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Textile Science and Engineering, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China
Product Research and Development Department, Lianyungang LDZ New Aoshen Spandex Co., Ltd., Lianyungang, China
Funding
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities · Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Jiangsu Province
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/polym1424551210.3390/polym14245512 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsabm.8b0035710.1021/acsabm.8b00357 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.10557110.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.105571 ↗
4. 10.1039/C4RA13918F10.1039/C4RA13918F ↗
5. 10.1016/j.powtec.2013.04.01510.1016/j.powtec.2013.04.015 ↗
6. Erdem R · J Eng Fibers Fabr · 2016 · 11 · 1177
7. Ou JF · Mater · 2019 · 237 · 134
8. 10.1016/S0305-4179(99)00108-410.1016/S0305-4179(99)00108-4 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0305-4179(99)00116-310.1016/S0305-4179(99)00116-3 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.11.11610.1016/j.apsusc.2013.11.116 ↗
11. 10.1590/1516-1439.02651510.1590/1516-1439.026515 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.02.03110.1016/j.compscitech.2016.02.031 ↗
13. Tan DQ · Emerging · 2024 · 13 · 56
14. 10.3390/pr1002038910.3390/pr10020389 ↗
15. Faten H · J Sol-Gel Sci Technol · 2023 · 109 · 226
16. 10.1016/j.optmat.2023.11471010.1016/j.optmat.2023.114710 ↗
17. 10.1080/1023666X.2020.183758710.1080/1023666X.2020.1837587 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.poly.2004.02.00610.1016/j.poly.2004.02.006 ↗
19. 10.1128/AEM.02001-0710.1128/AEM.02001-07 ↗
20. Feng QL · J Biomed · 2015 · 52 · 662
21. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.01510.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.015 ↗
22. 10.1007/s11696-017-0270-010.1007/s11696-017-0270-0 ↗
23. 10.3390/polym1602026110.3390/polym16020261 ↗
24. 10.1002/app.2398510.1002/app.23985 ↗
25. 10.1002/app.2608310.1002/app.26083 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.04.06310.1016/j.cclet.2019.04.063 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.04110.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.041 ↗
28. 10.1007/s10853-015-9205-810.1007/s10853-015-9205-8 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12515210.1016/j.cej.2020.125152 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00713-810.1016/S0032-3861(00)00713-8 ↗
31. Wan YP · J Text Res · 2023 · 44 · 149
32. 10.1177/004051751982689310.1177/0040517519826893 ↗
33. 10.1177/004051751245418710.1177/0040517512454187 ↗
34. 10.1002/app.4692310.1002/app.46923 ↗