Dye uptake prediction of Disperse Yellow 23 dye on PET fibers in supercritical carbon dioxide using neural networks
Source abstract
Abstract
In the research, the dye uptake of PET fibers treated with Disperse Yellow 23 dye in supercritical CO 2 was systematically explored across a range of parameters including dyeing time (10–90 min), dyeing temperature (70–130°C), and dyeing pressure (15–30 MPa). The models based on back propagation neural network (BPNN), genetic algorithm-BPNN (GA-BPNN), particle swarm optimization-BPNN (PSO-BPNN), and Sparrow search algorithm-BPNN (SSA-BPNN) were trained with input layer encompassing dyeing time, dyeing temperature, and dyeing pressure, and the output layer composed of dye uptake of Disperse Yellow 23 dye. The results show that the SSA-BPNN model demonstrated higher prediction accuracy, as evidenced by metrics including mean absolute error, mean squared error, root-mean-squared error, mean absolute percentage error, and correlation coefficient ( R 2 ), with values of 0.823, 1.139, 1.067, 3.565%, and 0.994 for the training set and 0.641, 0.626, 0.792, 3.558%, and 0.995 for the testing set.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Color Science and Applications · Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers · Image Enhancement Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Shandong University, Jinan, China
Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao City, Shandong Province, China
Funding
Study on the mechanism of supercritical carbon dioxide spray dyeing and its continuous process device
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1111/cote.1269010.1111/cote.12690 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.supflu.2023.10597810.1016/j.supflu.2023.105978 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0896-8446(99)00020-010.1016/S0896-8446(99)00020-0 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.supflu.2014.03.00610.1016/j.supflu.2014.03.006 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jcou.2018.04.01710.1016/j.jcou.2018.04.017 ↗
6. 10.1177/00405175930630030210.1177/004051759306300302 ↗
7. 10.1177/00405175940640070110.1177/004051759406400701 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.supflu.2021.10530210.1016/j.supflu.2021.105302 ↗
9. 10.1007/s11696-021-01688-710.1007/s11696-021-01688-7 ↗
10. 10.3390/pr1010196010.3390/pr10101960 ↗
11. 10.1007/s11696-019-00936-110.1007/s11696-019-00936-1 ↗
12. 10.1007/s12221-022-4449-910.1007/s12221-022-4449-9 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.supflu.2014.08.02310.1016/j.supflu.2014.08.023 ↗
14. Elmaaty TA, Sayed‑Ahmed K, Magdi M, et al. An eco‑friendly method of extracting alizarin from Rubia tinctorum roots under supercritical carbon dioxide and its application to wool dyeing. Sci Rep UK 2023; 13(1): 41598-022-27110-0.
15. 10.1007/s12221-022-3314-110.1007/s12221-022-3314-1 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.06.05710.1016/j.indcrop.2018.06.057 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.supflu.2013.02.02710.1016/j.supflu.2013.02.027 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.cjche.2015.11.02710.1016/j.cjche.2015.11.027 ↗
19. 10.1111/cote.1270610.1111/cote.12706 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.fluid.2023.11398110.1016/j.fluid.2023.113981 ↗
21. 10.3390/pr812163110.3390/pr8121631 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.08.00710.1016/j.measurement.2014.08.007 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.161710.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1617 ↗
24. 10.1080/21642583.2019.170883010.1080/21642583.2019.1708830 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.11.03110.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.11.031 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.11.03810.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.11.038 ↗
27. 10.1002/app.4175610.1002/app.41756 ↗
28. 10.1109/79.18070510.1109/79.180705 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.probengmech.2007.10.00310.1016/j.probengmech.2007.10.003 ↗
30. Tu J, Wei XH, Huang BB, et al. Improvement of sap flow estimation by including phenological index and time-lag effect in back-propagation neural network models. Agr Forest Meteorol 2019; 2019: 276–277.