journal article·2024-10Open access

Concave and convex small radius bending behavior of single and multiple layers reinforcement fabrics

Philippe Kanz, Francois Robitaille

Textile Research Journal· Volume 94· Issue 19-20

Abstract

Multilayer reinforcement fabrics are increasingly used for manufacturing structural polymer composites. In liquid molding processes, dry reinforcement fabrics are draped on a mold first, and infused with a liquid resin such as an epoxy in a subsequent manufacturing step. This presents major advantages in terms of operational flexibility and costs. However, draping multilayer reinforcement fabrics on complex mold geometries is challenging. Small radius mold corners constitute a major manufacturing challenge as they lead to variability in dry fabric positioning and resin-rich corners in polymer composite parts. Spring-back of fabrics bent over or into single curvature mold corners is a widespread industrial concern. However, contrary to draping over double-curvature surfaces, bending spring-back from convex or concave single-curvature corners has received very limited attention. No testing method is available. This paper quantifies reinforcement fabric bending spring-back. Single and multiple layer stacks were bent along three directions over convex and into concave 90° corners with five radii spanning 1.59 mm to 12.70 mm. In all cases, five replicated tests enabled variability quantification. Fabric stacks were also quantified using cantilevered bending tests for comparison purposes. Mold radius was found to affect the behavior to a larger extent than testing direction, number of layers or use of a binder.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Structural Analysis and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ottawa, Canada

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11008910.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110089 ↗
2. 10.1177/1528083723121313810.1177/15280837231213138 ↗
3. 10.1080/1944702300866152910.1080/19447023008661529 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.06110.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.061 ↗
5. Raheel M. · 1996
6. 10.1016/0956-7143(94)90062-010.1016/0956-7143(94)90062-0 ↗
7. 10.1016/S1359-835X(03)00025-310.1016/S1359-835X(03)00025-3 ↗
8. 10.1080/00405000.2014.97754410.1080/00405000.2014.977544 ↗
9. ISO 2313-1:2021(EN). Textiles – Determination of the recovery from creasing of a folded specimen of fabric by measuring the angle of recovery – Part 1: Method of the horizontally folded specimen. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 2021.
10. AATCC 66 2017 Edition 2022 · 2022
11. 10.1080/0040500070175756010.1080/00405000701757560 ↗
12. 10.1177/004051751350736310.1177/0040517513507363 ↗
13. 10.1080/00405000.2010.51572710.1080/00405000.2010.515727 ↗
14. ASTM D1388 · 2018
15. ASTM F3260 · 2017
16. 10.1177/004051751452318210.1177/0040517514523182 ↗
17. Wheeler DJ. · 1990