Efficient purification of high-salt rural groundwater in the areas along the Yellow River in Henan Province, China, by hollow fiber membrane distillation process
Source abstract
Abstract
The vast rural drinking water sources along the Yellow River basin in Henan Province mainly come from the local high-salinity groundwater, which cannot be directly drunk. Zeolitic imidazolate framework-71/polyvinylidene fluoride hollow fiber composite membrane was applied to treat rural groundwater through membrane distillation technology. The variations of water quality parameters from 12 different rural regions after membrane distillation treatment were well analyzed and compared. Membrane separation performance for water samples from different regions during the membrane distillation process was investigated, including water flux and salt rejection. During a continuous 24-h membrane distillation process for the treatment of these water samples, hollow fiber membrane exhibits high solute retention rates (>99%) for salt ions, suspended solids and total dissolved solids, which are within the limits of national standards (GB 5749-2006), meanwhile membrane permeation water flux can remain stable. After the acid-cleaning for 180 min, all hollow fiber membranes can recover water flux well with a flux recovery rate above 98%. Even if the concentration ratio continued to increase, the water production rate of membrane distillation was basically maintained between 50% and 60%, which was obviously higher than the 30% of the reverse osmosis process. The economic analysis confirmed that the water production cost varied between US$0.45 and US$0.29/m 3 . With the extension of membrane service life, the specific membrane cost decreased rapidly in the first 6 years and then leveled off. The proposed vacuum membrane distillation process proved to be a promising water purification method for treating rural high-salinity groundwater.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Textiles Engineering, Henan University of Engineering, China
Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Textile Equipment and Technology by MOE and Henan Provincial Government, Zhongyuan University of Technology, P.R. China
Funding
the Key Research Project of Higher Education of Henan Province · the Project supported by the Program for Henan Science and Technology Development · the Program for Henan Science and Technology Development
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.envadv.2022.10020010.1016/j.envadv.2022.100200 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.07.01310.1016/j.jjcc.2022.07.013 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.13562910.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135629 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.eti.2022.10293910.1016/j.eti.2022.102939 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.desal.2020.11488710.1016/j.desal.2020.114887 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13536710.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135367 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.desal.2019.11407110.1016/j.desal.2019.114071 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jece.2021.10547310.1016/j.jece.2021.105473 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.10282810.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102828 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13294910.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132949 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.10.05410.1016/j.memsci.2016.10.054 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cep.2022.10886210.1016/j.cep.2022.108862 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.desal.2022.11564210.1016/j.desal.2022.115642 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.11283610.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112836 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.watres.2020.11613410.1016/j.watres.2020.116134 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.desal.2020.11453210.1016/j.desal.2020.114532 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.desal.2021.11523510.1016/j.desal.2021.115235 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.11798810.1016/j.seppur.2020.117988 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.04.03710.1016/j.memsci.2019.04.037 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.desal.2019.06.02610.1016/j.desal.2019.06.026 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.04910.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.049 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.memsci.2021.12010110.1016/j.memsci.2021.120101 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11880210.1016/j.memsci.2020.118802 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.11720410.1016/j.memsci.2019.117204 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.09.01510.1016/j.memsci.2018.09.015 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.memsci.2021.11944310.1016/j.memsci.2021.119443 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jece.2023.10986610.1016/j.jece.2023.109866 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11880210.1016/j.memsci.2020.118802 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jece.2021.10558210.1016/j.jece.2021.105582 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11891510.1016/j.memsci.2020.118915 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.seppur.2015.11.02610.1016/j.seppur.2015.11.026 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.11775610.1016/j.memsci.2019.117756 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.11734810.1016/j.seppur.2020.117348 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jece.2021.10682810.1016/j.jece.2021.106828 ↗
35. Yan Z · Environ Sci-Water Res · 2018 · 4 · 428
36. 10.1007/s11356-018-2475-310.1007/s11356-018-2475-3 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.10329410.1016/j.jwpe.2022.103294 ↗
38. 10.1039/D1NR02192C10.1039/D1NR02192C ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.10233910.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102339 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.13611410.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136114 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.desal.2022.11555410.1016/j.desal.2022.115554 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.10296910.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102969 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.desal.2017.11.03310.1016/j.desal.2017.11.033 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.12319810.1016/j.seppur.2023.123198 ↗
45. 10.1039/D0CS00097C10.1039/D0CS00097C ↗
46. 10.1039/C9EW01055F10.1039/C9EW01055F ↗
47. 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.11607510.1016/j.seppur.2019.116075 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.12.02810.1016/j.apenergy.2012.12.028 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.desal.2018.03.00510.1016/j.desal.2018.03.005 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.11701310.1016/j.seppur.2020.117013 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12219410.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122194 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.desal.2023.11640010.1016/j.desal.2023.116400 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13061310.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130613 ↗