journal article·2022-03

The deposition of nanofibers onto a traditional filtration medium and their effects on filtration efficiency

Adéla Kotzianová, Zuzana Hrubá, Štěpán Vondrovic, Ondřej Židek, Marek Pokorný, Vladimír Velebný

Textile Research Journal· Volume 92· Issue 5-6
Publisher page

Abstract

Traditional filtration media composed of fibers with sizes on the micrometer scale have difficulty filtering particles a little smaller than 300 nm. Even though nanofibrous materials are able to capture these particles and can have excellent filtration efficiency, their widespread use continues to be inhibited by several obstacles, particularly an excessive pressure drop and the inability to form self-supporting filtration membranes. We have prepared two types of composite materials, namely an ultra-thin nanofibrous layer made of polyurethane or nylon with various fiber diameters and pore areas. Scanning electron microscopy was used for their characterization. The nanofibrous layer was deposited directly onto a traditional melt-blown polypropylene filtration fabric with a very low area weight of 30 g/m 2 , which facilitates handling and bypasses the need for the layer to be self-supporting. Moreover, a fine polyethylene mesh was added as a separate layer to prevent humidity from passing through the filtration material as well as to cover fabrics. The filtration efficiency and the pressure drop of the prepared materials were determined. The results showed that the incorporation of a nylon nanofibrous layer with smaller fiber diameters and pore areas leads to a significant increase in the filtration efficiency (92%) against the most penetrating particles, the critical size of which decreased to 50 nm, while the pressure drop was comparable to the pressure drop of a commercially available FFP2 respirator. The prepared filtration material could be used to manufacture respirators.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Infection Control and Ventilation · Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation · Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Contipro, Czech Republic

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.08.00210.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.08.002 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.microc.2020.10492810.1016/j.microc.2020.104928 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0325210.1021/acsnano.0c03252 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.09.01410.1016/j.jhin.2019.09.014 ↗
5. Ullah S · ACS Appl Nano Mater. Epub ahead of print · 2020 · 12
6. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0225010.1021/acsnano.0c02250 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.envres.2020.11029410.1016/j.envres.2020.110294 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.colcom.2020.10027510.1016/j.colcom.2020.100275 ↗
9. European Commission, 2006. Risk assessment by the Scientific committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks: The appropriateness of existing methodologies to assess the potential risks associated with engineered and adventitious products of nanotechnologies. https://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_o_003b.pdf
10. 10.1080/15459624.2016.122515710.1080/15459624.2016.1225157 ↗
11. ASTM F2299/F2299M – 03:2017. Standard test method for determining the initial efficiency of materials used in medical face masks to penetration by particulates using latex spheres.
12. EN 149:2001+A1:2009. Respiratory protective devices - filtering half masks to pro.
13. EN 14683:2019+AC:2019. Medical face masks - requirements and test methods.
14. 10.1007/s42765-020-00049-510.1007/s42765-020-00049-5 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11787910.1016/j.memsci.2020.117879 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.10623610.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106236 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsanm.0c0161910.1021/acsanm.0c01619 ↗
18. 10.3390/nano1104090010.3390/nano11040900 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12384110.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123841 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matlet.2020.12842610.1016/j.matlet.2020.128426 ↗
21. 10.1002/adv.2156810.1002/adv.21568 ↗
22. 10.7554/eLife.5730910.7554/eLife.57309 ↗