journal article·2019-11-26Open access

Synthesis of High-Silica Erionite Driven by Computational Screening of Hypothetical Zeolites

Cristian-R. Boruntea, German Sastre, Lars F. Lundegaard, Avelino Corma, Peter N. R. Vennestrøm

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 31· Issue 22

Abstract

A hypothetical zeolite framework was selected from a database of hypothetical structures and adapted based on the structural features relevant for deNOx and MTO catalysis. To attempt the realization of this structure, a computational energy-based approach was applied to select relevant organic structure directing agent (OSDA) molecules with large OSDA–zeolite stabilization energies, leading to the selection of three OSDAs (OSDA1, OSDA2, and OSDA3) as potential candidates for the synthesis of the hypothetical zeolite (Hypo#1). Instead of Hypo#1, erionite (ERI) was found to dominate the experimental product outcome when potassium was used as a mineralizing agent. In the case of OSDA3, a novel high-silica ERI was found. The different ERI products were characterized, intergrowth structures ruled out, and special attention was paid to the compositional and morphological features arising from the use of the different OSDAs. In the specific high-Si product obtained using OSDA3, a distinct tubular to prismatic crystal morphology could be seen. Theoretical stabilization energies calculated for potentially competing phases (Hypo#1, ERI, offretite (OFF), and chabazite (CHA) among others) could be used to rationalize the experimental outcome to a certain extent, but our results also show that only considering zeolite−OSDA interaction is probably not sufficient to realize hypothetical frameworks, especially for Al-containing zeolites where alkali ions play an important role during crystallization.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions · Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Haldor Topsøe A/S, Haldor Topsøes Allé 1, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark

Instituto de Tecnología Química, Universitat Politècnica de València-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Avenida de los Naranjos s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain

Umicore Denmark ApS, Nøjsomhedsvej 20, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark

Funding

Ministerio de Econom?a y Competitividad · Innovationsfonden · Haldor Topsoe A/S

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Flanigen, E. M. In Introduction to Zeolite Science and Practice; van Bekkum, H., Flanigen, E. M., Jansen, J. C., Eds. Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, 1991; Chapter 2, pp 13–34.10.1016/S0167-2991(08)63599-5 ↗
2. Moscou, L. In Introduction to Zeolite Science and Practice; van Bekkum, H., Flanigen, E. M., Jansen, J. C., Eds. Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, 1991; Chapter 1, pp 1–12.
3. 10.1021/ja302233510.1021/ja3022335 ↗
4. 10.1002/tcr.20170009210.1002/tcr.201700092 ↗
5. 10.1038/nature1457510.1038/nature14575 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsami.5b0799610.1021/acsami.5b07996 ↗
7. 10.1038/nmat345510.1038/nmat3455 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.aal012110.1126/science.aal0121 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41929-018-0104-710.1038/s41929-018-0104-7 ↗
10. Foster, M. D.; Treacy, M. M. J. A Database of Hypothetical Zeolite Structures. http://www.hypotheticalzeolites.net (accessed March 9, 2015).
11. 10.1524/zkri.1997.212.11.76810.1524/zkri.1997.212.11.768 ↗
12. 10.1038/2321010.1038/23210 ↗
13. 10.1021/ie051072810.1021/ie0510728 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0457810.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04578 ↗
15. 10.1007/s11244-015-0381-110.1007/s11244-015-0381-1 ↗
16. 10.1016/s1387-1811(00)00344-910.1016/s1387-1811(00)00344-9 ↗
17. Dassault Systèmes BIOVIA. Materials Studio, 8.0; Dassault Systèmes: San Diego. https://www.3dsbiovia.com (accessed March 16, 2015).
18. 10.1039/b615035g10.1039/b615035g ↗
19. 10.1016/s0167-2991(07)80793-210.1016/s0167-2991(07)80793-2 ↗
20. 10.1002/anie.20171330810.1002/anie.201713308 ↗
21. 10.1021/jacs.6b0134110.1021/jacs.6b01341 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0167610.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01676 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0489210.1021/acs.chemmater.6b04892 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0601010.1021/acs.jpcc.5b06010 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2009.08.03110.1016/j.micromeso.2009.08.031 ↗
26. 10.1039/ft991870194710.1039/ft9918701947 ↗
27. 10.1021/ja962176010.1021/ja9621760 ↗
28. 10.1002/qua.56020070310.1002/qua.560200703 ↗
29. 10.1093/imamat/6.1.7610.1093/imamat/6.1.76 ↗
30. 10.1093/comjnl/13.3.31710.1093/comjnl/13.3.317 ↗
31. 10.2307/200487310.2307/2004873 ↗
32. 10.2307/200484010.2307/2004840 ↗
33. 10.1039/a606455h10.1039/a606455h ↗
34. 10.1080/089270203100010488710.1080/0892702031000104887 ↗
35. 10.1002/anie.20120634010.1002/anie.201206340 ↗
36. 10.1515/zkri-2014-180110.1515/zkri-2014-1801 ↗
37. 10.1180/minmag.1959.032.247.0110.1180/minmag.1959.032.247.01 ↗
38. 10.1107/s056774087701078410.1107/s0567740877010784 ↗
39. 10.1021/ja105185r10.1021/ja105185r ↗
40. Miller, M. A.; Lewis, G. J.; Gisselquist, J. L.; Moscoso, J. G.; Patton, R. L. UZM-12 and UZM-12HS: crystalline aluminosilicate zeolitic compositions and processes for preparing and using the compositions. U.S. Patent 7,344,694 B2, 2008.
41. Xie, D.; Zones, S. I.; Lew, C. M.; Davis, T. M. Molecular sieve SSZ-98. U.S. Patent 9,409,786 B2, 2016.
42. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.11.00210.1016/j.micromeso.2018.11.002 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jcat.2015.03.01310.1016/j.jcat.2015.03.013 ↗
44. 10.1039/C7CY00996H10.1039/C7CY00996H ↗
45. Xie, D.; Chen, C. Y. Synthesis of aluminosilicate zeolite SSZ-98. U.S. Patent 20,160,375,428 A1, 2016.
46. 10.1016/0144-2449(86)90032-110.1016/0144-2449(86)90032-1 ↗
47. 10.1016/0927-6513(96)00002-810.1016/0927-6513(96)00002-8 ↗