journal article·2025-04-01

Electron Transport in Borophene–Graphene Lateral Edge–Edge Junctions

Yuefei Huang, Henry Yu, Favian Sun, Qiyuan Ruan, Boris I. Yakobson

ACS Nano· Volume 19· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

Recently, a lateral heterojunction between borophene and graphene has been synthesized. This suggests borophene’s potential application with graphene in nanoelectronics, and therefore, it is important to know the electron transport properties of their interface. We use density functional theory combined with the nonequilibrium Green’s function method to calculate the transmission spectrum and the contact resistance of the junction at different doping levels. The electron transmission is determined by energy and momentum matching of borophene and graphene channels, as well as symmetry matching of wave functions. We find that the σ electrons in borophene are totally reflected at the interface, and π electrons have a transmission probability of up to 0.8. The high transmission probability leads to a low contact resistance of ∼115 Ω·μm at a doping p = 2 × 10 12 cm 2, better than state-of-the-art contacts from other metals such as Pd and Au, indicating borophene to be a good conductor in graphene-based devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Advancements in Battery Materials · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and NanoEngineering

Rice University

Funding

Office of Naval Research

References (76)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.110289610.1126/science.1102896 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1491610.1103/PhysRevB.50.14916 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.352421510.1063/1.3524215 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.15550110.1103/PhysRevLett.108.155501 ↗
5. 10.1088/1367-2630/16/9/09500210.1088/1367-2630/16/9/095002 ↗
6. 10.1021/nn501226z10.1021/nn501226z ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.11550110.1103/PhysRevLett.99.115501 ↗
8. 10.1021/nl300475410.1021/nl3004754 ↗
9. 10.1021/nn302696v10.1021/nn302696v ↗
10. 10.1038/nchem.252110.1038/nchem.2521 ↗
11. 10.1002/adfm.20160505910.1002/adfm.201605059 ↗
12. 10.1126/science.aad108010.1126/science.aad1080 ↗
13. 10.1038/nchem.249110.1038/nchem.2491 ↗
14. 10.1021/jacs.7b1032910.1021/jacs.7b10329 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.11680210.1103/PhysRevLett.125.116802 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.23543010.1103/PhysRevB.98.235430 ↗
17. 10.1039/C6CP05092A10.1039/C6CP05092A ↗
18. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.05.05210.1016/j.commatsci.2019.05.052 ↗
19. 10.1039/C8CP03815E10.1039/C8CP03815E ↗
20. 10.1039/C9NR05279H10.1039/C9NR05279H ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b1255910.1021/acs.jpcc.8b12559 ↗
22. 10.1039/C8TC05269G10.1039/C8TC05269G ↗
23. 10.1002/anie.20180008710.1002/anie.201800087 ↗
24. 10.1007/s12274-008-8037-010.1007/s12274-008-8037-0 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.367768610.1063/1.3677686 ↗
26. 10.1021/nl303583v10.1021/nl303583v ↗
27. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0715910.1021/acsnano.6b07159 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41586-018-0129-810.1038/s41586-018-0129-8 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevX.4.03100510.1103/PhysRevX.4.031005 ↗
30. 10.1038/nmat445210.1038/nmat4452 ↗
31. 10.1021/jp806437y10.1021/jp806437y ↗
32. 10.1126/science.124435810.1126/science.1244358 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0287910.1021/acsnano.6b02879 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0182210.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01822 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0366310.1021/acs.jpclett.0c03663 ↗
36. 10.3390/app1008273110.3390/app10082731 ↗
37. 10.1063/5.009102810.1063/5.0091028 ↗
38. 10.1126/science.aab409710.1126/science.aab4097 ↗
39. 10.1002/adma.20180366510.1002/adma.201803665 ↗
40. 10.1038/nmat409110.1038/nmat4091 ↗
41. 10.1002/smll.20160430110.1002/smll.201604301 ↗
42. 10.1126/sciadv.aax644410.1126/sciadv.aax6444 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c0090910.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00909 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRev.136.B86410.1103/PhysRev.136.B864 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A113310.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.16540110.1103/PhysRevB.65.165401 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.cpc.2016.09.02210.1016/j.cpc.2016.09.022 ↗
48. 10.1038/nnano.2011.610.1038/nnano.2011.6 ↗
49. 10.1038/s41598-017-05069-710.1038/s41598-017-05069-7 ↗
50. 10.1039/C5CP04613K10.1039/C5CP04613K ↗
51. 10.1038/nphys41210.1038/nphys412 ↗
52. Datta S. · 1997
53. 10.1021/ja904186210.1021/ja9041862 ↗
54. 10.1073/pnas.101838810810.1073/pnas.1018388108 ↗
55. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.25680510.1103/PhysRevLett.105.256805 ↗
56. 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.10910.1103/RevModPhys.81.109 ↗
57. 10.1109/TED.2018.280112510.1109/TED.2018.2801125 ↗
58. 10.3390/nano1204065610.3390/nano12040656 ↗
59. 10.1039/c3cp52589a10.1039/c3cp52589a ↗
60. Markussen, T.; Stokbro, K. Metal-InGaAs contact resistance calculations from first principles. 2016 International Conference on Simulation of Semiconductor Processes and Devices (SISPAD); IEEE, 2016; pp 373–376.10.1109/SISPAD.2016.7605224 ↗
61. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.07680710.1103/PhysRevLett.104.076807 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.physleta.2014.03.00810.1016/j.physleta.2014.03.008 ↗
63. 10.1063/1.349649010.1063/1.3496490 ↗
64. 10.1021/nn405834b10.1021/nn405834b ↗
65. 10.7567/APEX.8.02510110.7567/APEX.8.025101 ↗
66. 10.1063/1.487570910.1063/1.4875709 ↗
67. Datta S. · 200510.1017/CBO9781139164313 ↗
68. 10.4236/jmp.2017.8404110.4236/jmp.2017.84041 ↗
69. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.11511710.1103/PhysRevB.76.115117 ↗
70. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.20541310.1103/PhysRevB.75.205413 ↗
71. 10.1107/S002188981103897010.1107/S0021889811038970 ↗
72. 10.1038/s41467-023-41779-510.1038/s41467-023-41779-5 ↗
73. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
74. 10.1088/0953-8984/14/11/30210.1088/0953-8984/14/11/302 ↗
75. 10.1039/C6TC00115G10.1039/C6TC00115G ↗
76. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0526510.1021/acs.jpcc.6b05265 ↗