journal article·2025-04-15

Lanthanide-Selective Artificial Channels

Harekrushna Behera, Tyler J. Duncan, Laxmicharan Samineni, Hyeonji Oh, Ankit Jogdand, Arnav Karnik, Raman Dhiman, Aida Fica, Tzu-Yun Hsieh, Venkat Ganesan, Manish Kumar

ACS Nano· Volume 19· Issue 14
Publisher page

Abstract

Lanthanides serve as essential elements for modern technology, playing critical roles in batteries, wind turbines, portable electronics, and energy-efficient lighting. Purifying lanthanides from ores and recycling them from end-of-life consumer materials are costly and damaging to the environment due to inefficient separation technologies. In this study, we present a new approach for lanthanide separations using supramolecular membrane channel nanopores based on a pillar[5]arene scaffold with appended diphenylphosphine oxide (DPP) ligands. These channels show high transport selectivity (>18:1) of the middle lanthanides, europium (Eu 3+ ) and terbium (Tb 3+ ) ions, over monovalent K + ions and also excluded other common mono- and divalent metal ions (Na +, Ca 2+, and Mg 2+ ) including protons. These membrane channels also have high lanthanide–lanthanide transport selectivity with Eu 3+ /La 3+ selectivity of >40 and Eu 3+ /Yb 3+ selectivity of ∼30. Additionally, they demonstrated significantly higher selectivities between middle lanthanides and both light and heavy lanthanides: Tb 3+ /La 3+ (∼140), Tb 3+ /Yb 3+ (∼72), Tb 3+ /Nd 3+ (∼58), and Eu 3+ /Nd 3+ (∼17), which are considerably higher than selectivities reported in studies using traditional solvent extraction methods. Molecular dynamics simulations indicate that the high selectivity observed is due to specific water-mediated interactions between the hydrated ions and the channel. Our findings could contribute to ongoing efforts to improve lanthanide separation efficiency and reduce the environmental impact associated with current methods.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes · Radioactive element chemistry and processing · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

McKetta Department of Chemical Engineering

University of Texas at Austin

Maseeh Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering

Department of Chemistry

Funding

Basic Energy Sciences

References (82)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.aau762810.1126/science.aau7628 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ccr.2016.04.00310.1016/j.ccr.2016.04.003 ↗
3. 10.1021/cen-09330-bus210.1021/cen-09330-bus2 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.gsf.2018.12.00510.1016/j.gsf.2018.12.005 ↗
5. 10.1039/b516376p10.1039/b516376p ↗
6. 10.1039/C5CS00376H10.1039/C5CS00376H ↗
7. 10.1126/science.aaa909110.1126/science.aaa9091 ↗
8. Humphries M. · 2010
9. Joint Research, C.; Institute for Energy and, T. · 2014
10. Chu S. · 2011
11. 10.1021/es203518d10.1021/es203518d ↗
12. 10.1002/tcr.20180001210.1002/tcr.201800012 ↗
13. 10.3389/fenrg.2014.0004510.3389/fenrg.2014.00045 ↗
14. Royen H. · 2016
15. 10.1016/j.envint.2016.10.00210.1016/j.envint.2016.10.002 ↗
16. 10.1021/ja072750f10.1021/ja072750f ↗
17. 10.1080/18811248.1998.973383310.1080/18811248.1998.9733833 ↗
18. 10.1002/jctb.28060031310.1002/jctb.280600313 ↗
19. 10.1021/acscentsci.1c0072410.1021/acscentsci.1c00724 ↗
20. 10.1021/sc500255n10.1021/sc500255n ↗
21. 10.1039/C6DT00474A10.1039/C6DT00474A ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.7b1258910.1021/acsami.7b12589 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.9b0418310.1021/acsami.9b04183 ↗
24. 10.1038/ncomms1536910.1038/ncomms15369 ↗
25. 10.1039/C7EN00412E10.1039/C7EN00412E ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b0240910.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b02409 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b0183510.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b01835 ↗
28. 10.1002/anie.20171224610.1002/anie.201712246 ↗
29. 10.1038/s44221-022-00006-z10.1038/s44221-022-00006-z ↗
30. 10.1038/s41893-023-01145-110.1038/s41893-023-01145-1 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jece.2021.10710410.1016/j.jece.2021.107104 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jre.2022.04.00910.1016/j.jre.2022.04.009 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.11926310.1016/j.seppur.2021.119263 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.mineng.2022.10743010.1016/j.mineng.2022.107430 ↗
35. 10.3390/membranes1201008010.3390/membranes12010080 ↗
36. 10.1126/science.280.5360.6910.1126/science.280.5360.69 ↗
37. 10.1073/pnas.201716811810.1073/pnas.2017168118 ↗
38. 10.1021/acscentsci.9b0064210.1021/acscentsci.9b00642 ↗
39. 10.1021/acscentsci.1c0072410.1021/acscentsci.1c00724 ↗
40. 10.1039/C9CC03292D10.1039/C9CC03292D ↗
41. 10.1002/cjoc.20140089910.1002/cjoc.201400899 ↗
42. 10.1038/3510200910.1038/35102009 ↗
43. 10.1038/s41586-023-05945-510.1038/s41586-023-05945-5 ↗
44. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa00910.1093/bioinformatics/btaa009 ↗
45. 10.1021/jacs.7b0747910.1021/jacs.7b07479 ↗
46. 10.1002/chem.20150088110.1002/chem.201500881 ↗
47. 10.1002/anie.20230562310.1002/anie.202305623 ↗
48. 10.1016/0005-2736(72)90179-410.1016/0005-2736(72)90179-4 ↗
49. 10.1016/0005-2736(72)90178-210.1016/0005-2736(72)90178-2 ↗
50. 10.1021/ac00135a01210.1021/ac00135a012 ↗
51. Grossfield, WHAM – Grossfield Lab. http://membrane.urmc.rochester.edu/?page_id=126, (accessed 2024-01-25).
52. Hille B. · 2001
53. 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.12130810.1016/j.memsci.2022.121308 ↗
54. 10.1002/chem.20150397910.1002/chem.201503979 ↗
55. 10.1002/chem.20039001610.1002/chem.200390016 ↗
56. 10.1007/BF0187542210.1007/BF01875422 ↗
57. 10.1002/anie.20200839310.1002/anie.202008393 ↗
58. 10.1246/cl.1995.43510.1246/cl.1995.435 ↗
59. 10.1021/ja010761h10.1021/ja010761h ↗
60. 10.1021/ja972648q10.1021/ja972648q ↗
61. 10.1021/jacs.1c0600010.1021/jacs.1c06000 ↗
62. 10.1038/s41467-023-44019-y10.1038/s41467-023-44019-y ↗
63. 10.1073/pnas.211266611810.1073/pnas.2112666118 ↗
64. 10.1016/S0006-3495(81)84901-610.1016/S0006-3495(81)84901-6 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.bpc.2006.04.01510.1016/j.bpc.2006.04.015 ↗
66. WHAM: The Weighted Histogram Analysis Method, Version 2.0.11. http://membrane.urmc.rochester.edu/wordpress/?page_id=126.
67. 10.1146/annurev-physchem-012320-01545710.1146/annurev-physchem-012320-015457 ↗
68. 10.1007/s10847-014-0441-310.1007/s10847-014-0441-3 ↗
69. 10.1085/jgp.20111068410.1085/jgp.201110684 ↗
70. 10.1002/cphc.20070080310.1002/cphc.200700803 ↗
71. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b0036310.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b00363 ↗
72. 10.1021/ic00284a02810.1021/ic00284a028 ↗
73. 10.1021/ic00121a02410.1021/ic00121a024 ↗
74. 10.1016/0020-1693(95)90073-F10.1016/0020-1693(95)90073-F ↗
75. 10.1038/s41467-018-04604-y10.1038/s41467-018-04604-y ↗
76. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0365910.1021/acsnano.9b03659 ↗
77. 10.1039/C8FD00043C10.1039/C8FD00043C ↗
78. 10.1021/acsnano.4c0969910.1021/acsnano.4c09699 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.12095710.1016/j.memsci.2022.120957 ↗
80. 10.1038/s41565-020-00796-x10.1038/s41565-020-00796-x ↗
81. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c0145010.1021/acs.chemmater.2c01450 ↗
82. Fica, A.; Torbett, M.; West, S.; Rao, M.; Dhiman, R.; Wang, J.; Gao, Y.; Tu, Y.M.; Behera, H.; Roc, C.; Grogan, K.; Keitz, B.; Hickey, R.; Rosales, A.; Dorttivanlioglu, B.; Sarles, S.; Kumar, M. 3D-printable bilayer-stabilized jammed emulsions as scalable biological tissue mimics ChemRxiv 2025,10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-xccxm.10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-xccxm ↗