journal article·2025-09-23Open access

Quantifying the Influence of Nanosheet Aspect Ratio on Network Morphology and Junction Resistance in Solution-Processed Nanosheet Networks

Eoin Caffrey, Jose M. Munuera, Cian Gabbett, Luke Doolan, Joseph Neilson, Rebekah A. Wells, Mark McCrystall, Alexandra McNamara, Tian Carey, Martin Gerlei, Paul Seifert, Georg S. Duesberg, Jonathan N. Coleman

ACS Nano· Volume 19· Issue 37

Abstract

Optimizing solution-processed nanosheet networks for electronic applications requires understanding the relationship between nanosheet dimensions, network morphology, and electrical properties. Here, we fabricate graphene nanosheets with both low- and high-aspect-ratios using liquid-phase exfoliation (LPE) and electrochemical exfoliation (EE), respectively. Spray-coated networks of both nanosheet types display distinct morphological and electrical properties. High-resolution 3D imaging shows that low-aspect-ratio LPE nanosheet networks display a disordered, porous structure with point-like junctions. Conversely, high-aspect-ratio EE graphene forms low-porosity networks with highly aligned nanosheets with large-area conformal junctions. Electrical measurements demonstrate that EE networks achieve lower resistivity and reduced percolation thicknesses due to reduced junction resistances and improved nanosheet alignment. We propose a theoretical model linking nanosheet bending rigidity, aspect ratio, and junction formation, highlighting the critical role of nanosheet flexibility in enabling conformal junctions. Furthermore, by size-selecting both nanosheet types, we measure the dependence of network resistivity on nanosheet thickness. LPE networks show increasing resistivity with thickness, whereas EE networks exhibit decreasing resistivity. We develop a simple model linking these behaviors to point-like and planar junctions respectively and quantify the size-dependence of both nanosheet and junction resistance for both cases. Unexpectedly, data analysis using this model predicts the EE nanosheets to be more conductive than the LPE ones, a fact confirmed by THz spectroscopy. This study establishes the importance of nanosheet aspect ratio and flexibility in governing network morphology and electrical performance. Our findings provide key insights for developing high-performance, solution-processed 2D material networks for future electronic devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · 2D Materials and Applications · Advancements in Battery Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Physics, CRANN & AMBER Research Centres

Trinity College Dublin

Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología del Carbono, NCAR-CSIC, C/Francisco Pintado Fe 26, Oviedo 33011, Spain

Institute of Physics, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Werner-Heisenberg-Weg 39, Neubiberg D-85579, Germany

Funding

Science Foundation Ireland · Irish Research Council · H2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions · HORIZON EUROPE Digital, Industry and Space

References (92)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41578-021-00386-w10.1038/s41578-021-00386-w ↗
2. 10.1038/s41578-022-00448-710.1038/s41578-022-00448-7 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.02.00510.1016/j.nanoen.2014.02.005 ↗
4. 10.1002/admt.20170005310.1002/admt.201700053 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0000910.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00009 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsnano.3c0697210.1021/acsnano.3c06972 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20210611010.1002/adma.202106110 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsaelm.2c0178410.1021/acsaelm.2c01784 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsnano.2c1131910.1021/acsnano.2c11319 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20220377210.1002/adma.202203772 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.1c2162310.1021/acsami.1c21623 ↗
12. 10.1126/science.aag287910.1126/science.aag2879 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41586-018-0574-410.1038/s41586-018-0574-4 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41467-024-48614-510.1038/s41467-024-48614-5 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsnano.4c0974510.1021/acsnano.4c09745 ↗
16. 10.1002/smll.20240686410.1002/smll.202406864 ↗
17. 10.1002/smtd.20230165410.1002/smtd.202301654 ↗
18. 10.1021/nn303904z10.1021/nn303904z ↗
19. 10.1039/C6RA04250C10.1039/C6RA04250C ↗
20. 10.1002/adfm.20180438710.1002/adfm.201804387 ↗
21. 10.1126/science.aal406210.1126/science.aal4062 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsaelm.0c0036810.1021/acsaelm.0c00368 ↗
23. 10.1021/nn204460910.1021/nn2044609 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41928-021-00684-910.1038/s41928-021-00684-9 ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20140026710.1002/adma.201400267 ↗
26. 10.1002/adfm.20110044810.1002/adfm.201100448 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.497960710.1063/1.4979607 ↗
28. 10.1039/C5NR08047A10.1039/C5NR08047A ↗
29. 10.1021/acsnano.1c1073910.1021/acsnano.1c10739 ↗
30. 10.1038/s44160-022-00232-z10.1038/s44160-022-00232-z ↗
31. 10.1038/nnano.2013.4610.1038/nnano.2013.46 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.apmt.2018.03.00210.1016/j.apmt.2018.03.002 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.07.05310.1016/j.carbon.2015.07.053 ↗
34. 10.1038/ncomms557610.1038/ncomms5576 ↗
35. 10.1038/nmat394410.1038/nmat3944 ↗
36. 10.1039/D2CC03366F10.1039/D2CC03366F ↗
37. 10.1039/C8NR03091J10.1039/C8NR03091J ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0346810.1021/acs.chemmater.9b03468 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.09.01510.1016/j.carbon.2020.09.015 ↗
40. 10.1038/s41467-023-44450-110.1038/s41467-023-44450-1 ↗
41. 10.1016/0009-2509(89)85053-510.1016/0009-2509(89)85053-5 ↗
42. 10.1080/09506608.2016.124999510.1080/09506608.2016.1249995 ↗
43. 10.1038/s41563-019-0529-710.1038/s41563-019-0529-7 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.24541310.1103/PhysRevB.74.245413 ↗
45. 10.1088/0022-3727/42/10/10200210.1088/0022-3727/42/10/102002 ↗
46. 10.1063/1.491507510.1063/1.4915075 ↗
47. 10.1063/1.285747210.1063/1.2857472 ↗
48. 10.1021/acsnano.4c0974510.1021/acsnano.4c09745 ↗
49. 10.1088/2053-1583/ab389210.1088/2053-1583/ab3892 ↗
50. 10.1021/nn102580310.1021/nn1025803 ↗
51. 10.1021/acsnano.1c0651910.1021/acsnano.1c06519 ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.15540710.1103/PhysRevB.68.155407 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.01.06110.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.01.061 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2017.05.00810.1016/j.synthmet.2017.05.008 ↗
55. 10.1021/acsami.5b0187510.1021/acsami.5b01875 ↗
56. 10.1038/s41699-025-00525-910.1038/s41699-025-00525-9 ↗
57. 10.1088/0022-3719/12/11/02310.1088/0022-3719/12/11/023 ↗
58. 10.1038/s41928-025-01338-w10.1038/s41928-025-01338-w ↗
59. Fukuda K. · 2015 · 13910.1007/978-4-431-55654-1_6 ↗
60. Window A. L. · 1992
61. 10.1021/nl302959a10.1021/nl302959a ↗
62. 10.1021/acsanm.1c0004010.1021/acsanm.1c00040 ↗
63. 10.1088/1361-6528/ad272f10.1088/1361-6528/ad272f ↗
64. 10.1002/smll.20200654210.1002/smll.202006542 ↗
65. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0722810.1021/acsnano.5b07228 ↗
66. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0223410.1021/acsnano.9b02234 ↗
67. Synnatschke K. · 2021
68. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2023.10652810.1016/j.ultsonch.2023.106528 ↗
69. 10.1002/adma.20230357010.1002/adma.202303570 ↗
70. 10.1039/D4NH00224E10.1039/D4NH00224E ↗
71. 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2017.08.00410.1016/j.cryogenics.2017.08.004 ↗
72. 10.1007/s10762-017-0362-510.1007/s10762-017-0362-5 ↗
73. 10.1038/s41567-022-01541-y10.1038/s41567-022-01541-y ↗
74. 10.1103/physrevb.96.20543910.1103/physrevb.96.205439 ↗
75. 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.15510610.1103/PhysRevB.64.155106 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.carbon.2023.11864210.1016/j.carbon.2023.118642 ↗
77. 10.1038/srep0224810.1038/srep02248 ↗
78. 10.1039/d1nr05815k10.1039/d1nr05815k ↗
79. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0777110.1021/acsnano.0c07771 ↗
80. 10.1038/s41467-024-48614-510.1038/s41467-024-48614-5 ↗
81. 10.1021/acsami.5b0091010.1021/acsami.5b00910 ↗
82. 10.1002/adma.20210288310.1002/adma.202102883 ↗
83. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0091010.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00910 ↗
84. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0518810.1021/acs.chemmater.7b05188 ↗
85. 10.1039/C6TA02811J10.1039/C6TA02811J ↗
86. 10.1021/acsami.3c0745910.1021/acsami.3c07459 ↗
87. 10.1103/PhysRev.104.84410.1103/PhysRev.104.844 ↗
88. 10.1364/OE.23.03072110.1364/OE.23.030721 ↗
89. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx18010.1093/bioinformatics/btx180 ↗
90. 10.1038/nmeth.201910.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
91. 10.1016/j.softx.2016.09.00210.1016/j.softx.2016.09.002 ↗
92. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw41310.1093/bioinformatics/btw413 ↗