journal article·2024-12-17Open access

Colloidal Dispersions of Sterically and Electrostatically Stabilized PbS Quantum Dots: Structure Factors, Second Virial Coefficients, and Film-Forming Properties

Ahhyun Jeong, Joshua Portner, Christian P. N. Tanner, Justin C. Ondry, Chenkun Zhou, Zehan Mi, Youssef A. Tazoui, Byeongdu Lee, Vivian R. K. Wall, Naomi S. Ginsberg, Dmitri V. Talapin

ACS Nano· Volume 18· Issue 50

Abstract

Electrostatically stabilized nanocrystals (NCs) and, in particular, quantum dots (QDs) hold promise for forming strongly coupled superlattices due to their compact and electronically conductive surface ligands. However, studies of the colloidal dispersion and interparticle interactions of electrostatically stabilized sub-10 nm NCs have been limited, hindering the optimization of their colloidal stability and self-assembly. In this study, we employed small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) experiments to investigate the interparticle interactions and arrangement of PbS QDs with thiostannate ligands (PbS–Sn 2 S 6 4– ) in polar solvents. The study reveals significant deviations from the ideal solution behavior in electrostatically stabilized QD dispersions. Our results demonstrate that PbS–Sn 2 S 6 4– QDs exhibit long-range interactions within the solvent, in contrast to the short-range steric repulsion characteristic of PbS QDs with oleate ligands (PbS-OA). Introducing highly charged multivalent electrolytes screens electrostatic interactions between charged QDs, reducing the length scale of the repulsive interactions. Furthermore, we calculated the second virial ( B 2 ) coefficients from SAXS data, providing insights into how surface chemistry, solvent, and size influence pair potentials. Finally, we explore the influence of long-range interparticle interactions of PbS–Sn 2 S 6 4– QDs on the morphology of films produced by drying or spin-coating colloidal solutions. The long-range repulsive term of PbS–Sn 2 S 6 4– QDs promotes the formation of amorphous films, and screening the electrostatic repulsion by the addition of an electrolyte enables the formation of crystalline domains. These findings highlight the critical role of NC–NC interactions in tailoring the properties of functional materials made of colloidal NCs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, James Franck Institute, and Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States

Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States

X-ray Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Avenue, Lemont, Illinois 60439, United States

Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States

Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division and Materials Sciences and Chemical Sciences Divisions, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, United States

Kavli Energy NanoSciences Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States

STROBE, NSF Science & Technology Center, Berkeley, California 94720, United States

Center for Nanoscale Materials, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, United States

Funding

National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program · Kwanjeong Educational Foundation · Basic Energy Sciences · Camille and Henry Dreyfus Foundation · David and Lucile Packard Foundation · University of Chicago · Division of Materials Research

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.aaz854110.1126/science.aaz8541 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41928-021-00632-710.1038/s41928-021-00632-7 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.device.2024.10040110.1016/j.device.2024.100401 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsnano.2c0804210.1021/acsnano.2c08042 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0006310.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00063 ↗
6. 10.1002/adom.20220157710.1002/adom.202201577 ↗
7. 10.1002/sstr.20200002410.1002/sstr.202000024 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20180008210.1002/adma.201800082 ↗
9. 10.1093/nsr/nww09710.1093/nsr/nww097 ↗
10. 10.1038/nmat452610.1038/nmat4526 ↗
11. 10.1126/science.117052410.1126/science.1170524 ↗
12. 10.1021/ja102483210.1021/ja1024832 ↗
13. 10.1021/ja500628810.1021/ja5006288 ↗
14. 10.1021/nn502470v10.1021/nn502470v ↗
15. 10.1021/ja308200f10.1021/ja308200f ↗
16. 10.1021/acsanm.8b0169610.1021/acsanm.8b01696 ↗
17. 10.1038/nnano.2011.4610.1038/nnano.2011.46 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0019610.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00196 ↗
19. 10.1557/mrs.2020.25210.1557/mrs.2020.252 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b0547110.1021/acs.jpcb.6b05471 ↗
21. 10.1016/S1369-7021(06)71621-210.1016/S1369-7021(06)71621-2 ↗
22. 10.1016/S1369-7021(06)71620-010.1016/S1369-7021(06)71620-0 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0168810.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01688 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0220210.1021/acsnano.8b02202 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0355210.1021/acsnano.9b03552 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0288310.1021/acs.langmuir.8b02883 ↗
27. 10.1021/jp505618210.1021/jp5056182 ↗
28. Israelachvili J. N. · 2011 · 291
29. 10.1016/0079-6816(93)90010-S10.1016/0079-6816(93)90010-S ↗
30. 10.1016/0079-6816(93)90013-L10.1016/0079-6816(93)90013-L ↗
31. 10.1021/j150453a00110.1021/j150453a001 ↗
32. 10.1126/science.abm675310.1126/science.abm6753 ↗
33. 10.48550/arXiv.2404.1680810.48550/arXiv.2404.16808 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsnano.3c1218610.1021/acsnano.3c12186 ↗
35. 10.1126/science.aaa295110.1126/science.aaa2951 ↗
36. 10.1021/ja510862c10.1021/ja510862c ↗
37. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0000610.1021/acsnano.9b00006 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0069010.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00690 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.152410.1103/PhysRevLett.62.1524 ↗
40. 10.1002/smll.20090035810.1002/smll.200900358 ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c0262710.1021/acs.jpclett.2c02627 ↗
42. 10.1038/nature0310910.1038/nature03109 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.10.32110.1103/PhysRevLett.10.321 ↗
44. 10.1063/1.357095610.1063/1.3570956 ↗
45. 10.1371/journal.pone.021878910.1371/journal.pone.0218789 ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.25800210.1103/PhysRevLett.121.258002 ↗
47. 10.48550/arXiv.2404.1775610.48550/arXiv.2404.17756 ↗
48. 10.1002/andp.20160034210.1002/andp.201600342 ↗
49. 10.1021/la991621c10.1021/la991621c ↗
50. 10.1063/1.501078410.1063/1.5010784 ↗
51. 10.1016/S0022-0248(98)00826-410.1016/S0022-0248(98)00826-4 ↗
52. 10.1039/c2sm07436b10.1039/c2sm07436b ↗
53. 10.1295/polymj.16.44510.1295/polymj.16.445 ↗
54. 10.1021/ja01156a07110.1021/ja01156a071 ↗
55. 10.1007/s10953-009-9408-110.1007/s10953-009-9408-1 ↗
56. 10.3389/fmolb.2022.98622310.3389/fmolb.2022.986223 ↗
57. 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-061020-05304610.1146/annurev-conmatphys-061020-053046 ↗
58. 10.1063/1.286877310.1063/1.2868773 ↗
59. 10.1038/ncomms1210610.1038/ncomms12106 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.coche.2017.04.00110.1016/j.coche.2017.04.001 ↗
61. 10.1063/1.199656910.1063/1.1996569 ↗
62. 10.1021/jp047153j10.1021/jp047153j ↗
63. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0007610.1021/acsnano.0c00076 ↗
64. 10.1021/ja907442510.1021/ja9074425 ↗
65. 10.1038/nnano.2015.24710.1038/nnano.2015.247 ↗