journal article·2025-06-17

Differential Mapping of Intracellular Metallic Nanoparticles and Ions and Dynamic Modeling Prediction

Neng Yan, Yan Wang, Tin Yan Wong, Zhiwei Wu, Xiuxiu Wang, Minwei Xie, Elena Kutumova, Alessandro Parodi, Fedor Kolpakov, Wen-Xiong Wang, Jianbo Shi

ACS Nano· Volume 19· Issue 23
Publisher page

Abstract

Predicting the toxicity of metallic nanoparticles (MNPs) remains a longstanding challenge in the biomedical field, primarily due to the unresolved dynamic transformation between pristine MNPs and their dissolved ionic counterparts within living systems. Herein, we develop an integrative bioimaging-mathematical framework that quantifies, in real-time mode, the contributions of MNPs and their ionic counterparts to toxicity. By integrating aggregation-induced emission (AIE)-based confocal imaging with label-free scattered light tracking, we achieve simultaneous and noninvasive visualization of different-sized pristine silver, copper oxide, and zinc oxide nanoparticles (Ag-, CuO-, and ZnO-NPs, 20–100 nm) and their ionic forms in living cells. This dual-modal approach reveals size-dependent intracellular dissolution dynamics, with 2.68–34.7% of internalized MNPs dissolving post uptake and smaller particles releasing 1.08–1.22 times more ions than larger particles. Leveraging these spatiotemporal insights, we developed a cascading toxicity model that mechanistically links extracellular dissolution, cellular uptake, intracellular transformation, and toxicity pathways. The model demonstrates that ionic species dominate toxicity across all MNPs, contributing 59.7–79.4% (AgNPs), 69.6–100% (CuO-NPs), and 97.7% (ZnO-NPs) of overall toxicity within 0–100 mg/L. Strikingly, toxicity profiles vary by MNP type: AgNPs exhibit biphasic toxicity, CuO-NPs follow a logistic-like pattern, and ZnO-NPs remain entirely ion-driven. By bridging real-time bioimaging with kinetic modeling, our framework provides the first in vivo quantitative resolution of nanoparticle- versus ion-specific toxicity. This work not only advances mechanistic understanding of MNP behavior but also establishes a universally applicable tool for predictive nanotoxicology, enabling safer design of nanomaterials and informed regulatory policies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

MOE Key Laboratory of Groundwater Quality and Health, School of Environmental Studies

China University of Geosciences

School of Environmental Science and Engineering

Guangzhou University

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering

The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

China Hangzhou Puyu Technology Co., Ltd.

College of the Environment and Ecology

Xiamen University

Department of Computational Biology, Scientific Center for Translation Medicine

Sirius University of Science and Technology

Laboratory of Bioinformatics

Federal Research Center for Information and Computational Technologies

School of Energy and Environment and State Key Laboratory of Marine Pollution

City University of Hong Kong

Research Centre for the Oceans and Human Health

City University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Research Institute

State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology

Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Knowledge Innovation Program of Wuhan-Shuguang Project

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41467-019-14131-z10.1038/s41467-019-14131-z ↗
2. 10.1038/s41586-018-0275-z10.1038/s41586-018-0275-z ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.est.3c0512910.1021/acs.est.3c05129 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.est.0c0858810.1021/acs.est.0c08588 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0600310.1021/acsnano.8b06003 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.17301210.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173012 ↗
7. 10.1021/es403462j10.1021/es403462j ↗
8. 10.1080/17435390.2016.117980910.1080/17435390.2016.1179809 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.impact.2016.06.00110.1016/j.impact.2016.06.001 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.06.02010.1016/j.semcancer.2021.06.020 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.est.4c0332810.1021/acs.est.4c03328 ↗
12. 10.1038/nnano.2011.1010.1038/nnano.2011.10 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.02.00210.1016/j.yrtph.2011.02.002 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.comtox.2022.10022510.1016/j.comtox.2022.100225 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.watres.2021.11760310.1016/j.watres.2021.117603 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.est.5b0053810.1021/acs.est.5b00538 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c0646610.1021/acs.jafc.3c06466 ↗
18. 10.1002/anie.20140505010.1002/anie.201405050 ↗
19. 10.1021/nn301008710.1021/nn3010087 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.tox.2022.15313610.1016/j.tox.2022.153136 ↗
21. 10.1002/smll.20130394710.1002/smll.201303947 ↗
22. 10.1021/tx800064j10.1021/tx800064j ↗
23. 10.1007/s10311-020-01033-610.1007/s10311-020-01033-6 ↗
24. 10.1039/D1EN00299F10.1039/D1EN00299F ↗
25. 10.3109/17435390.2011.57963210.3109/17435390.2011.579632 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsnano.4c0303210.1021/acsnano.4c03032 ↗
27. 10.2174/157341101766621031611082210.2174/1573411017666210316110822 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.10510.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.105 ↗
29. 10.1080/10643389.2021.193436810.1080/10643389.2021.1934368 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.12886210.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128862 ↗
31. 10.1021/jacs.9b0589410.1021/jacs.9b05894 ↗
32. 10.1021/es404037z10.1021/es404037z ↗
33. 10.1063/5.017081210.1063/5.0170812 ↗
34. 10.1002/adma.20150590610.1002/adma.201505906 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.est.9b0115610.1021/acs.est.9b01156 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsnano.4c1388010.1021/acsnano.4c13880 ↗
37. 10.1039/C9EN00363K10.1039/C9EN00363K ↗
38. 10.1039/C8CC02245C10.1039/C8CC02245C ↗
39. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100348810.1371/journal.pcbi.1003488 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsomega.0c0014910.1021/acsomega.0c00149 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsnano.3c0851410.1021/acsnano.3c08514 ↗
42. 10.1021/jacs.7b0402210.1021/jacs.7b04022 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.trac.2019.11572110.1016/j.trac.2019.115721 ↗
44. 10.1021/acs.est.3c1025710.1021/acs.est.3c10257 ↗
45. 10.1039/C9EN00553F10.1039/C9EN00553F ↗
46. 10.1021/ja050301e10.1021/ja050301e ↗
47. 10.1039/D1EN00021G10.1039/D1EN00021G ↗
48. 10.1038/s41598-020-68960-w10.1038/s41598-020-68960-w ↗
49. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.16199510.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161995 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.01.02310.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.01.023 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.05510.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.055 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.16409110.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164091 ↗
53. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0248310.1021/acsnano.5b02483 ↗
54. 10.1080/17435390.2022.213364610.1080/17435390.2022.2133646 ↗
55. 10.1093/mtomcs/mfac07610.1093/mtomcs/mfac076 ↗
56. 10.1007/s11051-005-6931-x10.1007/s11051-005-6931-x ↗
57. 10.1039/C9EN00587K10.1039/C9EN00587K ↗
58. Serban, R.; Hindmarsh, A. C. CVODES: the sensitivity-enabled ODE solver in SUNDIALS. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference 2005; Vol. 47438, pp 257–269.10.1115/DETC2005-85597 ↗
59. 10.1093/nar/gkz44010.1093/nar/gkz440 ↗
60. 10.1002/int.2035810.1002/int.20358 ↗
61. 10.5194/hess-27-1827-202310.5194/hess-27-1827-2023 ↗
62. 10.1038/nnano.2011.1010.1038/nnano.2011.10 ↗
63. 10.2166/wst.2013.42110.2166/wst.2013.421 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.watres.2022.11910410.1016/j.watres.2022.119104 ↗
65. 10.1021/es101484s10.1021/es101484s ↗
66. 10.1016/j.fct.2022.11346910.1016/j.fct.2022.113469 ↗
67. 10.1186/1743-8977-11-1110.1186/1743-8977-11-11 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.etap.2019.10322010.1016/j.etap.2019.103220 ↗
69. 10.1021/nn800511k10.1021/nn800511k ↗