journal article·2024-09-17

Uncovering Atomic Migrations Behind Magnetic Tunnel Junction Breakdown

Hwanhui Yun, Deyuan Lyu, Yang Lv, Brandon R. Zink, Pravin Khanal, Bowei Zhou, Wei-Gang Wang, Jian-Ping Wang, K. Andre Mkhoyan

ACS Nano· Volume 18· Issue 37
Publisher page

Abstract

As advances in computing technology increase demand for efficient data storage solutions, spintronic magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ)-based magnetic random-access memory (MRAM) devices emerge as promising alternatives to traditional charge-based memory devices. Successful applications of such spintronic devices necessitate understanding not only their ideal working principles but also their breakdown mechanisms. Employing an in situ electrical biasing system, atomic-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) reveals two distinct breakdown mechanisms. Soft breakdown occurs at relatively low electric currents due to electromigration, wherein restructuring of MTJ core layers forms ultrathin regions in the dielectric MgO layer and edge conducting paths, reducing device resistance. Complete breakdown occurs at relatively high electric currents due to a combination of joule heating and electromigration, melting MTJ component layers at temperatures below their bulk melting points. Time-resolved, atomic-scale STEM studies of functional devices provide insight into the evolution of structure and composition during device operation, serving as an innovative experimental approach for a wide variety of electronic devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · ZnO doping and properties · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States

Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Dajeon 34114, South Korea

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States

Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, United States

Funding

Microsystems Technology Office · National Institute of Standards and Technology · Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology · Microelectronics Advanced Research Corporation · University of Minnesota · Division of Materials Research

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.106538910.1126/science.1065389 ↗
2. 10.1103/RevModPhys.76.32310.1103/RevModPhys.76.323 ↗
3. 10.1186/1556-276X-9-52610.1186/1556-276X-9-526 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.00710.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.007 ↗
5. Wang J.-P. · 2017
6. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.16671110.1016/j.jmmm.2020.166711 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.327310.1103/PhysRevLett.74.3273 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.05441610.1103/PhysRevB.63.054416 ↗
9. 10.1038/nmat159510.1038/nmat1595 ↗
10. Shih, Y. C. A Reflow-Capable, Embedded 8Mb STT-MRAM Macro with 9 ns Read Access Time in 16nm FinFET Logic CMos Process. In 2020 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM).10.1109/IEDM13553.2020.9372115 ↗
11. 10.1038/nmat280410.1038/nmat2804 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.353648210.1063/1.3536482 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.369427010.1063/1.3694270 ↗
14. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.303302310.1109/ACCESS.2020.3033023 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.145960810.1063/1.1459608 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.microrel.2012.06.03510.1016/j.microrel.2012.06.035 ↗
17. 10.3390/ma901004110.3390/ma9010041 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.310979210.1063/1.3109792 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.276975310.1063/1.2769753 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.318476610.1063/1.3184766 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.09.02810.1016/j.actamat.2018.09.028 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.491987310.1063/1.4919873 ↗
23. 10.1109/LED.2022.318427810.1109/LED.2022.3184278 ↗
24. 10.1038/ncomms1523210.1038/ncomms15232 ↗
25. 10.1109/LMAG.2016.258458210.1109/LMAG.2016.2584582 ↗
26. 10.1039/C8NR05928D10.1039/C8NR05928D ↗
27. 10.1063/1.497651210.1063/1.4976512 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cap.2019.01.01710.1016/j.cap.2019.01.017 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.163625510.1063/1.1636255 ↗
30. 10.3390/ma901004110.3390/ma9010041 ↗
31. Wu, L. Pinhole defect characterization and fault modeling for STT-MRAM Testing. In 2019 IEEE European Test Symposium (ETS), 2019; pp 1–610.1109/ETS.2019.8791518 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.294315110.1063/1.2943151 ↗
33. Sikder, B.; Baten, M. Z.; In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Emerging Electronics (ICEE), 2022; pp 1–5.10.1109/ICEE56203.2022.10118208 ↗
34. 10.1143/JJAP.49.04DD1510.1143/JJAP.49.04DD15 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.16660310.1103/PhysRevLett.93.166603 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.12.00810.1016/j.jmmm.2007.12.008 ↗
37. Shackerford J. F. · 2015
38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.9910.1103/PhysRevLett.77.99 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c0216210.1021/acs.nanolett.3c02162 ↗
40. 10.1038/s41598-023-29752-010.1038/s41598-023-29752-0 ↗
41. 10.1063/5.007504310.1063/5.0075043 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.495873210.1063/1.4958732 ↗
43. 10.1063/1.498187810.1063/1.4981878 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.18770110.1103/PhysRevLett.124.187701 ↗
45. 10.1017/S143192762200375010.1017/S1431927622003750 ↗
46. Egerton R. F. · 199610.1007/978-1-4757-5099-7 ↗