journal article·2024-07-09Open access

The Influence of Size on the Intracranial Distribution of Biomedical Nanoparticles Administered by Convection-enhanced Delivery in Minipigs

Mahsa Amirrashedi, Andreas Ingemann Jensen, Qing Tang, Natan Johannes Willem Straathof, Katharina Ravn, Christian G.T. Pedersen, Louise Langhorn, Frantz Rom Poulsen, Max Woolley, David Johnson, Julia Williams, Charlotte Kidd, Helge Thisgaard, Bo Halle

ACS Nano· Volume 18· Issue 27

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Because of the blood–brain barrier (BBB), successful drug delivery to the brain has long been a key objective for the medical community, calling for pioneering technologies to overcome this challenge. Convection-enhanced delivery (CED), a form of direct intraparenchymal microinfusion, shows promise but requires optimal infusate design and real-time distribution monitoring. The size of the infused substances appears to be especially critical, with current knowledge being limited. Herein, we examined the intracranial administration of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-coated nanoparticles (NPs) of various sizes using CED in groups of healthy minipigs ( n = 3). We employed stealth liposomes (LIPs, 130 nm) and two gold nanoparticle designs (AuNPs) of different diameters (8 and 40 nm). All were labeled with copper-64 for quantitative and real-time monitoring of the infusion via positron emission tomography (PET). NPs were infused via two catheters inserted bilaterally in the putaminal regions of the animals. Our results suggest CED with NPs holds promise for precise brain drug delivery, with larger LIPs exhibiting superior distribution volumes and intracranial retention over smaller AuNPs. PET imaging alongside CED enabled dynamic visualization of the process, target coverage, timely detection of suboptimal infusion, and quantification of distribution volumes and concentration gradients. These findings may augment the therapeutic efficacy of the delivery procedure while mitigating unwarranted side effects associated with nonvisually monitored delivery approaches. This is of vital importance, especially for chronic intermittent infusions through implanted catheters, as this information enables informed decisions for modulating targeted infusion volumes on a catheter-by-catheter, patient-by-patient basis.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · RNA Interference and Gene Delivery

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Nuclear Medicine

Odense University Hospital

Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science

Technical University of Denmark

Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research

Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre

The Hevesy Laboratory, Department of Health Technology

Biomedical Laboratory

University of Southern Denmark

Department of Clinical Research and BRIDGE (Brain Research - Interdisciplinary Guided Excellence)

Department of Neurosurgery

Renishaw Neuro Solutions Ltd (RNS)

Funding

Kr?ftens Bek?mpelse · Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.addr.2019.01.01210.1016/j.addr.2019.01.012 ↗
2. 10.1073/pnas.91.6.207610.1073/pnas.91.6.2076 ↗
3. 10.1093/neuonc/2.1.4510.1093/neuonc/2.1.45 ↗
4. 10.3171/2009.11.JNS09105210.3171/2009.11.JNS091052 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.00310.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.003 ↗
6. 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_302_1710.4103/ajns.AJNS_302_17 ↗
7. 10.1002/ijc.2912110.1002/ijc.29121 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.2c0081510.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.2c00815 ↗
9. 10.1215/15228517-2008-06810.1215/15228517-2008-068 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsabm.2c0021510.1021/acsabm.2c00215 ↗
11. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-05-032510.1158/1535-7163.MCT-05-0325 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.08.01610.1016/j.expneurol.2005.08.016 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.brainres.2004.12.00710.1016/j.brainres.2004.12.007 ↗
14. 10.1023/B:NEON.0000024743.56415.4b10.1023/B:NEON.0000024743.56415.4b ↗
15. 10.1073/pnas.050942510310.1073/pnas.0509425103 ↗
16. 10.1073/pnas.95.8.460710.1073/pnas.95.8.4607 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.11.00610.1016/j.jconrel.2017.11.006 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0314410.1021/acsnano.6b03144 ↗
19. 10.1038/mt.2011.1110.1038/mt.2011.11 ↗
20. 10.1038/mt.2010.11410.1038/mt.2010.114 ↗
21. 10.1002/ana.2545010.1002/ana.25450 ↗
22. Stiles, D. Method to Determine Distribution of a Material by an Infused Magnetic Resonance Image Contrast Agent US 9,008,752 B2, 2015.
23. 10.14791/btrt.2022.10.F-256210.14791/btrt.2022.10.F-2562 ↗
24. 10.1089/hum.2021.16310.1089/hum.2021.163 ↗
25. 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00599-X10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00599-X ↗
26. 10.1089/hgtb.2018.04910.1089/hgtb.2018.049 ↗
27. 10.3109/08982104.2012.69841810.3109/08982104.2012.698418 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.01.05410.1016/j.jconrel.2023.01.054 ↗
29. 10.3390/jnt204001210.3390/jnt2040012 ↗
30. 10.3390/scipharm8902001510.3390/scipharm89020015 ↗
31. 10.4103/2152-7806.15133710.4103/2152-7806.151337 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41551-021-00728-710.1038/s41551-021-00728-7 ↗
33. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-299810.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-2998 ↗
34. 10.3390/nano812100710.3390/nano8121007 ↗
35. 10.1088/1361-6528/ac968310.1088/1361-6528/ac9683 ↗
36. 10.1073/pnas.130450411010.1073/pnas.1304504110 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.addr.2014.07.00110.1016/j.addr.2014.07.001 ↗
38. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-363110.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3631 ↗
39. 10.1126/scitranslmed.300359410.1126/scitranslmed.3003594 ↗
40. 10.3390/cancers1301004710.3390/cancers13010047 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.12.02710.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.12.027 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.04.00610.1016/j.jconrel.2016.04.006 ↗
43. 10.1093/neuonc/nor05110.1093/neuonc/nor051 ↗
44. 10.3171/JNS-07/07/019010.3171/JNS-07/07/0190 ↗
45. 10.3171/2011.5.JNS1124610.3171/2011.5.JNS11246 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.04.00210.1016/j.drudis.2018.04.002 ↗
47. 10.1089/cbr.2009.067410.1089/cbr.2009.0674 ↗
48. Boucher Y. · Cancer Res · 1990 · 50 · 4478
49. 10.1007/s11095-022-03261-710.1007/s11095-022-03261-7 ↗
50. 10.1152/ajpregu.1999.277.4.R121810.1152/ajpregu.1999.277.4.R1218 ↗
51. 10.1088/0957-4484/15/1/01810.1088/0957-4484/15/1/018 ↗
52. 10.3171/jns.1999.90.2.031510.3171/jns.1999.90.2.0315 ↗
53. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000249256.09289.5F10.1227/01.NEU.0000249256.09289.5F ↗
54. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.08.02910.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.08.029 ↗
55. 10.1186/1743-8977-6-1510.1186/1743-8977-6-15 ↗
56. 10.1002/smll.20150234610.1002/smll.201502346 ↗
57. 10.3390/ijms2507405710.3390/ijms25074057 ↗
58. 10.1038/s41598-019-48748-310.1038/s41598-019-48748-3 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.10.00210.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.10.002 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.10.02310.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.10.023 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.02.00710.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.02.007 ↗