Insights into detailed hierarchical puncture-resistance for Bombyx mori silkworm cocoons
Source abstract
Abstract
Silkworm cocoons illustrate excellent puncture-resistance performance after an insight into their layers while a clear understanding of the correlation between the excellent puncture property and the silk secondary structure is still lacking. Herein, we peeled silkworm cocoon into eight layers, and a combination of examination techniques including scanning electron microscopy, tensile mechanical test, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction were applied to figure out the morphologies (surface and cross-section view), mechanical properties, secondary structure, the content of β-sheet, and crystallinity of each layer's fibroin after degumming. The results indicated that the fifth layer offers a higher level of puncture-resistance than the other layers except for the eighth layer. Additionally, a high content level of β-sheet structure and high crystallinity gives rise to the high puncture strength as for hierarchical silk fibers. In general, the new finding holds great potential inspiration for the design of puncture-resistant composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Silkworms and Sericulture Research · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Engineering Laboratory for Modern Silk, Soochow University, China
Key Laboratory of Multifunctional and Smart Systems, Suzhou Institute of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Science and Technology Guiding Project of China National Textile and Apparel Council · Undergraduate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program of Jiangsu Province · the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.09.04210.1016/j.actbio.2016.09.042 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.14810.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.148 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.msec.2013.03.05110.1016/j.msec.2013.03.051 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.06610.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.066 ↗
5. 10.1186/2194-0517-2-1410.1186/2194-0517-2-14 ↗
6. 10.1002/jemt.2284610.1002/jemt.22846 ↗
7. 10.1021/bm401023h10.1021/bm401023h ↗
8. 10.1016/j.coco.2017.02.00510.1016/j.coco.2017.02.005 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.00610.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.006 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matlet.2019.03.10810.1016/j.matlet.2019.03.108 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.08.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.08.002 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.02.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.02.001 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10853-017-0788-010.1007/s10853-017-0788-0 ↗
14. Li F · Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf · 2019 · 125
15. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.01.00510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.01.005 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.00510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.005 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.03010.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.030 ↗
18. 10.1039/C5CP06809F10.1039/C5CP06809F ↗
19. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b0039210.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00392 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.02.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.02.001 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevE.82.04191110.1103/PhysRevE.82.041911 ↗
22. 10.1002/mame.20140027610.1002/mame.201400276 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.03.04310.1016/j.actbio.2012.03.043 ↗
24. 10.1021/ma062418910.1021/ma0624189 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.07.00910.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.07.009 ↗
26. 10.1021/bm400845210.1021/bm4008452 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41598-019-38712-610.1038/s41598-019-38712-6 ↗
28. 10.1002/jrs.312310.1002/jrs.3123 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsami.5b0561510.1021/acsami.5b05615 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.11041410.1016/j.msec.2019.110414 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b0125810.1021/acs.biomac.5b01258 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.10.01410.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.10.014 ↗
33. 10.1039/b911049f10.1039/b911049f ↗
34. 10.1021/ja067471r10.1021/ja067471r ↗
35. 10.1038/nmat149310.1038/nmat1493 ↗
36. Chen SY, Liu ML, Huang HM, et al. Mechanical properties of Bombyx Mori silkworm silk fibre and its corresponding silk fibroin filament: A comparative study. Mater. Des. 2019; 181: 108077.10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108077 ↗
37. Cheng Y · J R Soc Interface · 2014 · 11
38. 10.1007/s12221-020-1184-y10.1007/s12221-020-1184-y ↗
39. 10.1016/j.coco.2020.10053910.1016/j.coco.2020.100539 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.05210.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.052 ↗
41. Boulet-Audet M · J Exp Biol · 2015 · 218 · 3138
42. 10.1098/rsif.2011.088710.1098/rsif.2011.0887 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.06.01210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.06.012 ↗
44. 10.1007/s10853-016-0298-510.1007/s10853-016-0298-5 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.msec.2012.01.02310.1016/j.msec.2012.01.023 ↗
46. 10.1039/C6TB01049K10.1039/C6TB01049K ↗
47. 10.1038/srep2757310.1038/srep27573 ↗
48. 10.1016/S1095-6433(00)00237-310.1016/S1095-6433(00)00237-3 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.01810.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.018 ↗
50. 10.1242/jeb.08254510.1242/jeb.082545 ↗
51. 10.1038/418741a10.1038/418741a ↗
52. 10.1039/C7CP03693K10.1039/C7CP03693K ↗
53. 10.1021/bm025695610.1021/bm0256956 ↗
54. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b0074910.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00749 ↗
55. 10.1002/adfm.20190113410.1002/adfm.201901134 ↗
56. 10.1002/smll.20190394810.1002/smll.201903948 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.jcis.2015.09.03810.1016/j.jcis.2015.09.038 ↗
58. 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b0168510.1021/acs.biomac.5b01685 ↗