The effects of fusion-based feature extraction for fabric defect classification
Source abstract
Abstract
Image processing has been employed in a variety of fields since the advent of image processing techniques. One of these fields is textiles. The existence of any defect in a fabric is one of the most important factors affecting the quality of the fabric. There are many types of fabric defects that can occur for various reasons. It is critical to figure out what caused the defect and fix it so that it does not occur again. Automation of fabric defect detection has recently attracted a great deal of interest in view of the development in artificial intelligence technology to be able to discover defects with a high degree of success and to limit the harm to the manufacturer. This study focuses on analyzing different feature extraction methods and different classifiers and discussing the advantages/disadvantages of the combinations and, unlike other studies, using feature fusion for feature extraction. Different cases have been created that handle fabric datasets from different angles and apply different methods of feature extraction (convolution neural network, minimum relevance and maximum redundancy) and classification (ensemble learning (EL), k-nearest neighbor, support vector machine (SVM)) for separating defected and un-defected patterned and un-patterned fabrics. ResNet18 is the convolution neural network-based model with the highest performance in feature extraction, while EL and the SVM allow us to achieve close and highly successful results in classification. When feature fusion is used, ResNet18 & GoogLeNet & SVM is the most successful combination compared to the others (94.66%).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Textile materials and evaluations · Image Processing Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Computer Engineering, Izmir Katip Çelebi University, Turkey
Faculty of Engineering, Computer Engineering, Dokuz Eylul University, Turkey
Faculty of Engineering, Textile Engineering, Dokuz Eylul University, Turkey
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/0040500920863121710.1080/00405009208631217 ↗
2. 10.1155/2020/818940310.1155/2020/8189403 ↗
3. Kısaoğlu Ö. Orta büyüklükte bir dokuma işletmesinde istatistiksel kalite kontrol sisteminin kurulması . MSc Thesis, Dokuz Eylül Üniversity, 2002.
4. 10.1177/00405175030730020910.1177/004051750307300209 ↗
5. 10.1177/00405175010710030610.1177/004051750107100306 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0031-3203(03)00005-010.1016/S0031-3203(03)00005-0 ↗
7. Behera BK · Ind J Fibre Text Res · 2007 · 32 · 421
8. Büyükkabasakal K.
9. Çelik Hİ · Ind J Fibre Text Res · 2014 · 39 · 254
10. 10.1109/ICTIA.2014.788376510.1109/ICTIA.2014.7883765 ↗
11. 10.1155/2015/37616310.1155/2015/376163 ↗
12. 10.1177/004051751881365610.1177/0040517518813656 ↗
13. 10.1109/SIU.2016.749602010.1109/SIU.2016.7496020 ↗
14. 10.1109/ISSPA.2007.455535310.1109/ISSPA.2007.4555353 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jvcir.2013.05.01110.1016/j.jvcir.2013.05.011 ↗
16. 10.1109/ICOMICON.2017.827909510.1109/ICOMICON.2017.8279095 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.patcog.2006.05.02310.1016/j.patcog.2006.05.023 ↗
18. 10.1109/IDAP.2017.809018810.1109/IDAP.2017.8090188 ↗
19. Ben Salem Y, Nasri S. Woven fabric defects detection based on texture classification algorithm. In: 8th international multi-conference on systems, signals & devices , Tunisia, 22–25 March 2011, 43(24). IAEA.
20. 10.1109/ICPR.2004.133376510.1109/ICPR.2004.1333765 ↗
21. 10.1109/CIEC.2016.751374810.1109/CIEC.2016.7513748 ↗
22. 10.1007/s11760-018-1294-910.1007/s11760-018-1294-9 ↗
23. Cuifang Z · Ind J Fibre Text Res · 2020 · 45 · 123
24. 10.1109/ISCCSP.2008.453724810.1109/ISCCSP.2008.4537248 ↗
25. 10.1177/15589250150100021010.1177/155892501501000210 ↗
26. 10.1080/00405000.2015.106176010.1080/00405000.2015.1061760 ↗
27. 10.1007/s11042-015-3041-310.1007/s11042-015-3041-3 ↗
28. 10.1007/s11042-018-6786-710.1007/s11042-018-6786-7 ↗
29. 10.1111/cote.1239410.1111/cote.12394 ↗
30. 10.1108/IJCST-11-2018-013510.1108/IJCST-11-2018-0135 ↗
31. Türkoğlu M · Bitlis Eren Univ J Sci · 2021 · 9 · 334
32. 10.1080/00405000.2023.220197810.1080/00405000.2023.2201978 ↗
33. 10.1109/CVPR.2016.9010.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
34. 10.1109/CVPR.2015.729859410.1109/CVPR.2015.7298594 ↗
35. Tellawi M. Classification of malaria infected cells using inception V1 . PhD Thesis, Near East University, 2019.
36. Krizhevsky A · Adv Neur Inform Proc Syst · 2012 · 25 · 1
37. Alom MZ, Taha TM, Yakopcic C, et al. The history began from AlexNet: a comprehensive survey on deep learning approaches. arXiv preprint arXiv :1803.01164 2018.
38. 10.1109/TPAMI.2005.15910.1109/TPAMI.2005.159 ↗
39. Baran M. Classification of multi-label data with machine learning methods . MSc Thesis, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, 2020.
40. Chomboon K, Chujai P, Teerarassamee P, et al. An empirical study of distance metrics for k-nearest neighbor algorithm. In: proceedings of the 3rd international conference on industrial application engineering , Kitakyushu, Japan, 28–31 March 2015, pp. 280–285.
41. 10.1007/BF0099401810.1007/BF00994018 ↗
42. Taheri S. Fusion of hand-crafted descriptors with CNN-based features for facial age estimation . PhD Thesis, Turkey: Eastern Mediterranean University, 2019.
43. Han J, Pei J, Kamber M, et al. Data mining: concepts and techniques . 3th ed. Massachusetts: Elsevier, 2011.