Study on decolorization of methylene blue with a kind of electrolytic active water
Source abstract
Abstract
Electrolytic active water was prepared by electrolytic treatment of sodium chloride aqueous solution using a self-made device. In order to investigate the properties of electrolytic active water , the pH value, available chlorine contents and decolorization ability on methylene blue solution were tested and compared with that of sodium hypochlorite aqueous solution. Experimental results showed that the electrolytic active water has higher oxidation capacity and decolorization efficiency for methylene blue compared with sodium hypochlorite solution, implying maybe other reactive oxygen species components besides hypochlorite existed in the electrolytic active water. The electrolytic active water was stable under long-term storage, and mechanical force with oxidation activity did not decrease. In addition, the decolorization kinetics of methylene blue in the electrolytic active water was explored, and it was found that, in general, the decolorization reaction of methylene blue in electrolytic active water was consistent with the first-order reaction kinetics model, but when the pH value of electrolytic active water solution was weakly alkaline or neutral, the decolorization reaction of methylene blue was closer to the second-order reaction kinetics model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced oxidation water treatment · Water Treatment and Disinfection · Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Textile Science and Engineering, Tiangong University, Tianjin, China
Hebei Ningfang Group Co. Ltd., Xingtai, China
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/poc.371210.1002/poc.3712 ↗
2. 10.1002/anie.20110502810.1002/anie.201105028 ↗
3. 10.1039/C5CP06078H10.1039/C5CP06078H ↗
4. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.11559710.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115597 ↗
5. 10.1021/jacs.7b0697310.1021/jacs.7b06973 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.11546810.1016/j.molliq.2021.115468 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jtice.2017.10.00210.1016/j.jtice.2017.10.002 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.11951910.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119519 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.11394010.1016/j.envpol.2020.113940 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11687210.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116872 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.04.04610.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.04.046 ↗
12. 10.1007/s11783-020-1350-x10.1007/s11783-020-1350-x ↗
13. 10.1177/004051751246029810.1177/0040517512460298 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.10.01010.1016/j.apcatb.2014.10.010 ↗
15. 10.1007/s12221-014-0273-110.1007/s12221-014-0273-1 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cej.2010.01.05610.1016/j.cej.2010.01.056 ↗
17. 10.1007/s13204-021-02008-x10.1007/s13204-021-02008-x ↗
18. 10.1016/j.cbi.2018.06.00310.1016/j.cbi.2018.06.003 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.08.03010.1016/j.seppur.2018.08.030 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41467-020-20521-510.1038/s41467-020-20521-5 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.01.10510.1016/j.cej.2018.01.105 ↗
22. 10.3390/w1109181810.3390/w11091818 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2020.06.03810.1016/j.arabjc.2020.06.038 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cej.2010.12.04710.1016/j.cej.2010.12.047 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.10.03810.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.10.038 ↗
26. 10.1039/D0RA03963B10.1039/D0RA03963B ↗
27. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.08.01210.1016/j.foodcont.2007.08.012 ↗
28. 10.3390/microorganisms901013610.3390/microorganisms9010136 ↗
29. 10.3390/app1213663910.3390/app12136639 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.cofs.2021.03.00410.1016/j.cofs.2021.03.004 ↗
31. 10.1111/1541-4337.1220010.1111/1541-4337.12200 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.08.03710.1016/j.foodcont.2015.08.037 ↗
33. Guerra Sierra BE · Energy Nexus · 2022
34. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.08.01210.1016/j.foodcont.2007.08.012 ↗
35. 10.4315/0362-028X-63.1.1910.4315/0362-028X-63.1.19 ↗
36. 10.1177/0040517521100031310.1177/00405175211000313 ↗
37. 10.1002/fsn3.30510.1002/fsn3.305 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.rvsc.2013.07.00910.1016/j.rvsc.2013.07.009 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.33010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.330 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.04.02110.1016/j.arabjc.2013.04.021 ↗
41. Zhi SL · J Environmenl Managem · 2018 · 213 · 392
42. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.05.18410.1016/j.apsusc.2018.05.184 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2019.10915010.1016/j.vacuum.2019.109150 ↗
44. 10.3390/catal1107079310.3390/catal11070793 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.12487510.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.124875 ↗
46. Mardikar SP · J Environment Chem Engng · 2020 · 8 · S22133437183071
47. Li K · J Mol Catalysis A: Chemical · 2014 · 383 · 1
48. 10.3390/catal1107079310.3390/catal11070793 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.01.07510.1016/j.apcatb.2017.01.075 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jlumin.2017.03.03910.1016/j.jlumin.2017.03.039 ↗