The effect of body shape and swimsuit type on the comfort of Chinese women wearing swimsuits
Source abstract
Abstract
Among the fitness and body shaping exercises of Chinese women, swimming has become an increasingly popular sporting activity. Swimsuits are fundamental to participation in this sport and paramount to achieving the wearers’ aim of participation. A survey of 3348 Chinese women showed that body fit is central to the purchase of a swimsuit, whether one piece or two piece, with the two-piece swimsuit proving the most popular in terms of comfort. This survey revealed that the comfort of a swimsuit is relative to the design variables of the swimsuit style, the material/body cover factor and, informed by the female form, body size and body shape. This is particularly pertinent in both the right and left anterior mammary regions and also the left lateral mammary region for the female wearer to stay comfortable during swimming when she moves in the water. This study investigated the factors that affect the comfort of women wearing swimsuits when they swim. The two-piece swimsuit was considered the most comfortable. It was also found that swimsuits negatively affect women’s chest area. These results present important considerations for swimsuit manufacturers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders · Textile materials and evaluations · Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Design, University of Leeds, UK
School of Mechanical Engineering, Xiangtan University, China
School of Computing, Central South University, China
Department of Infectious Diseases, Xiangtan Central Hospital, China
References (78)
Show source-provided references
1. Xu DF, Liu DY, Wu ZM. Analysis of physiological response by pressure developed by female swimsuit. J Beijing Inst Clothing Technol (Natural Science Edition) 2012; 32(1): 1–8.
2. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.0263910.3389/fpsyg.2019.02639 ↗
3. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102604-5.00010-X10.1016/B978-0-08-102604-5.00010-X ↗
4. HUAON. Research Report on Future Development Forecast and Investment Direction of China Swimwear 2022–2027 . HUAON Industrial Research Institute, Beijing, China, 2021 (Chinese edition).
5. Zhang Y · J Donghua University · 2010 · 5 · 8
6. Montagna G, Carvalho H, Catarino AP, et al. Ergonomic garment design for a seamless instrumented swimsuit. 2012; 10(2): 21–25.
7. 10.2114/jpa2.25.33110.2114/jpa2.25.331 ↗
8. 10.1080/00140139.2017.138729110.1080/00140139.2017.1387291 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2006.08.00210.1016/j.bodyim.2006.08.002 ↗
10. 10.1177/004051751882191110.1177/0040517518821911 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.05.10210.1016/j.proeng.2011.05.102 ↗
12. 10.1080/00140139.2020.175716110.1080/00140139.2020.1757161 ↗
13. 10.1249/01.MSS.0000128179.02306.5710.1249/01.MSS.0000128179.02306.57 ↗
14. Maruta N · J Home Econ Japan · 1988 · 39 · 607
15. Catarino AP, Carvalho H, Rocha AM, et al. Biosignal monitoring implemented in a swimsuit for athlete performance evaluation. 2011; 9(12): 807–813.
16. 10.1533/9781845690885.3.20410.1533/9781845690885.3.204 ↗
17. Kim JM. · J Fashion Business · 2011 · 15 · 96
18. 10.1071/HE1110210.1071/HE11102 ↗
19. 10.1111/cpf.1241210.1111/cpf.12412 ↗
20. 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182392c5f10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182392c5f ↗
21. 10.1177/0887302X850040010610.1177/0887302X8500400106 ↗
22. 10.2220/biomedres.30.6910.2220/biomedres.30.69 ↗
23. Drašinac G · Collegium Antropologicum · 2015 · 9 · 181
24. 10.1080/00140139.2019.165718410.1080/00140139.2019.1657184 ↗
25. 10.1016/S1369-7021(10)70203-010.1016/S1369-7021(10)70203-0 ↗
26. 10.1016/S1440-2440(02)80032-910.1016/S1440-2440(02)80032-9 ↗
27. 10.1249/01.MSS.0000053699.91683.CD10.1249/01.MSS.0000053699.91683.CD ↗
28. Förch R
29. Sanders R · Am Swimming Mag · 2001 · 5 · 23
30. 10.1249/01.MSS.0000074564.06106.1F10.1249/01.MSS.0000074564.06106.1F ↗
31. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.06.00110.1016/j.bodyim.2013.06.001 ↗
32. Alexander M · Int J Clothng Sci Technol
33. Pisut G · J Fashion Market Managem
34. 10.12816/003649710.12816/0036497 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.05.01010.1016/j.bodyim.2021.05.010 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.05.00310.1016/j.bodyim.2014.05.003 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.02.01110.1016/j.apergo.2013.02.011 ↗
38. 10.1519/JSC.000000000000050810.1519/JSC.0000000000000508 ↗
39. Osiani P · J Adv Sport Technol · 2019 · 3 · 81
40. 10.1080/00140139.2013.78955410.1080/00140139.2013.789554 ↗
41. 10.2752/978147428005110.2752/9781474280051 ↗
42. Bridger R. Introduction to ergonomics . CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA. 2008.
43. 10.5040/978149259545810.5040/9781492595458 ↗
44. 10.5539/ijps.v6n2p1910.5539/ijps.v6n2p19 ↗
45. 10.1080/00140139.2020.179527610.1080/00140139.2020.1795276 ↗
46. Zhou J, Feng S, Xiao H, et al. The Application and Interpretation of Clothing Sizing Systems. Beijing University Press, Beijing, China. 1992 (Chinese edition).
47. Pechter EA. Method for determining bra size and predicting postaugmentation breast size. In: Breast Augmentation . Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2009, pp. 77–83.10.1007/978-3-540-78948-2_11 ↗
48. ISO 8559-1: 2017 Size designation of clothes – Part 1 · 2017
49. 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.10301210.1016/j.apergo.2019.103012 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.03.05610.1016/j.ijid.2021.03.056 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.pedn.2021.07.02010.1016/j.pedn.2021.07.020 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.ijnss.2016.11.00510.1016/j.ijnss.2016.11.005 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.08110.1016/j.jad.2020.05.081 ↗
54. 10.1177/00405175790490091010.1177/004051757904900910 ↗
55. ISO 15535: 2006 General Requirements for Establishing Anthropometric Databases. International Organization for Standardization. See: https://www.iso.org/standard/57179.html (accessed 5 April 2021).
56. 10.1016/j.compind.2018.04.00410.1016/j.compind.2018.04.004 ↗
57. 10.1080/00140139.2018.148122910.1080/00140139.2018.1481229 ↗
58. Olsen C · College Entrance Examination Board · 2004 · 26 · 2006
59. 10.1201/9781439824306.ch210.1201/9781439824306.ch2 ↗
60. 10.2752/978184788368110.2752/9781847883681 ↗
61. 10.1533/9780857092878.22610.1533/9780857092878.226 ↗
62. 10.1177/0887302X060240010410.1177/0887302X0602400104 ↗
63. 10.1177/004051752097563210.1177/0040517520975632 ↗
64. 10.1177/004051751772049610.1177/0040517517720496 ↗
65. 10.1177/004051751139995910.1177/0040517511399959 ↗
66. Beury P. Young female adults’ two-piece swimsuit style choices in relation to their body shape, size, and satisfaction . Doctoral dissertation. Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA.
67. 10.1080/20932685.2021.196058010.1080/20932685.2021.1960580 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.tourman.2019.05.01010.1016/j.tourman.2019.05.010 ↗
69. 10.1093/jaarel/lfab10210.1093/jaarel/lfab102 ↗
70. 10.1080/17569370.2016.121511310.1080/17569370.2016.1215113 ↗
71. 10.1098/rsif.2010.048710.1098/rsif.2010.0487 ↗
72. Hobson W, Campbell C, Vickers M, et al. Swim, bike, run. Human Kinetics , Illinois, USA, 2001.
73. Zakaria N
74. 10.15221/18.22210.15221/18.222 ↗
75. 10.1177/089124321875601010.1177/0891243218756010 ↗
76. 10.7233/jksc.2016.66.8.04610.7233/jksc.2016.66.8.046 ↗
77. Bidonde J · Cochrane Database Syst Rev
78. Alter MJ. Science of flexibility. Human Kinetics , Illinois, USA, 2004.