journal article·2022-07

Printing performances of a new nitrogen-free urea substitute in silk printing of reactive dyes

Hongmei Wang, Yongfang Xian, Minghua Wu, Lili Wang

Textile Research Journal· Volume 92· Issue 13-14
Publisher page

Abstract

A new printing additive, GBPA, which is composed of glycerol and 1,4-butanediol, was used in silk printing with reactive dyes. The printing performance of GBPA in the reactive printing of silk fabrics was studied and compared with those of urea. The results showed that in deep printing of Reactive Turquoise K-GL on silk satin, GBPA obtained as stable a color performance as urea at dosages ranging from 8 wt% to 10 wt% in the printing paste. Using a range of thickeners, GBPA exhibited the same color level as urea when using sodium alginate as thickener. Using reactive blue dyes of various structures and reactive dyes of different colors, the color performance of GBPA was close or even superior to that of urea. Furthermore, GBPA achieved good printing performances on different silk fabrics. By using GBPA in reactive printing, the nitrogen content in the printing wastewater greatly reduced. GBPA has great application potential as an alternative to urea in silk printing with reactive dyes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers · Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Photopolymerization techniques and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Engineering Research Center for Eco-Dyeing and Finishing of Textiles, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, P. R. China

Funding

Key Research and Development Program of Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province · Zhejiang Province Public Welfare Technology Application Research Project

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.05310.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.053 ↗
2. 10.1533/joti.2005.011810.1533/joti.2005.0118 ↗
3. 10.1177/004051751879097910.1177/0040517518790979 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.07.00310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.07.003 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.09.03710.1016/j.dyepig.2018.09.037 ↗
6. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199802)10:3<241::AID-ADMA241>3.0.CO;2-Q10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199802)10:3<241::AID-ADMA241>3.0.CO;2-Q ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.01710.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.017 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.agee.2014.08.00710.1016/j.agee.2014.08.007 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.03.01810.1016/j.carbpol.2005.03.018 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.18210.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.182 ↗
11. 10.1007/s12221-021-0271-z10.1007/s12221-021-0271-z ↗
12. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.10807910.1016/j.dyepig.2019.108079 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.09010.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.090 ↗
14. Li YJ. · China Dye. Print. · 2016 · 42 · 27
15. Ding CY · Adv Mater Research · 2011
16. 10.1177/004051752098751910.1177/0040517520987519 ↗
17. Wang CL · Color Technol · 2021 · 1
18. 10.1007/s10570-021-03682-410.1007/s10570-021-03682-4 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10570-016-1124-610.1007/s10570-016-1124-6 ↗
20. 10.1177/004051751668527510.1177/0040517516685275 ↗
21. 10.1111/cote.1208910.1111/cote.12089 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2020.10873410.1016/j.dyepig.2020.108734 ↗