journal article·2020-11

Characterization and analysis of the tensile and acoustic emission parameter distributions of single wool fibers

Di Lu, Weidong Yu

Textile Research Journal· Volume 90· Issue 21-22
Publisher page

Abstract

Acoustic emission (AE) parameters of damaged material have discrete characteristics that are universally known. Such characteristics restrict wider use of AE analysis in materials such as textiles. In the present work, the best-fitted distribution models of AE signal energy are analyzed: amplitude, duration, tensile breaking strength, elongation, and specific work of wool fibers. The parameters of Weibull, normal, and log-normal distribution models are obtained by regression analysis. The chi-square, Kolmogorov–Smirnov, and maximum likelihood criterions are used to discriminate against the above models. The results show that the Weibull distribution is the best-fitted model for amplitude and elongation of wool. The best-fitted model for energy, strength, and specific work is the log-normal distribution. The differences between the cumulative distributions of the AE and tensile parameters are compared. It can be seen that strength also has a high correlation coefficient and a similarly cumulative distribution with energy and amplitude. Compared to amplitude, the relationship between energy and strength is supposed to be stronger.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Textiles, Donghua University, China

Key Laboratory of Textile Science and Technology, Donghua University, China

Funding

The National Key R&D Program of China

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/00219983710050021310.1177/002199837100500213 ↗
2. 10.1016/B978-0-08-101937-5.00011-710.1016/B978-0-08-101937-5.00011-7 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00013-X10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00013-X ↗
4. Sodomka L. Application of acoustical emission as a new effective diagnostic tool in the textile fields. In: 26th European conference on acoustic emission testing , Berlin, Germany, 15–17 September 2004, poster no. 539, pp.783–790. European Working Group on Acoustic Emission.
5. Nimdum P and Renard J. Use of acoustic emission to discriminate damage modes in carbon fibre reinforced epoxy laminate during tensile and buckling loading. ECCM 15-15th European Conference on Composite Materials . 2012, p. 8.
6. 10.1177/07316844880070030510.1177/073168448800700305 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.07.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2006.07.023 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.75012010910.1002/pc.750120109 ↗
9. 10.1051/matecconf/2017950701610.1051/matecconf/20179507016 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00060-910.1016/S0266-3538(00)00060-9 ↗
11. Attou A · Br J NDT · 1990 · 32 · 623
12. 10.1016/S0963-8695(97)00009-110.1016/S0963-8695(97)00009-1 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevE.65.06710210.1103/PhysRevE.65.067102 ↗
14. 10.1007/BF0036150210.1007/BF00361502 ↗
15. 10.1109/TR.2009.201949410.1109/TR.2009.2019494 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2007.10.00310.1016/j.ceramint.2007.10.003 ↗
17. Williams CA · J Am Stat Assoc · 1950 · 45 · 77
18. 10.1198/10618600131711511710.1198/106186001317115117 ↗
19. 10.1002/nav.2002910.1002/nav.20029 ↗
20. 10.1080/0361092800882788610.1080/03610928008827886 ↗
21. 10.1080/0361092910883051610.1080/03610929108830516 ↗