journal article·2017-07

A coupled-contour model for effective segmentation of cotton cross-sections in wide-field microscopic images

Quande Wang, Bugao Xu

Textile Research Journal· Volume 87· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

Image analysis of a fiber cross-section can provide direct measurements for cotton maturity. Effective segmentation of fiber contours in a cross-sectional image is paramount for accurate fiber geometrical measurements. In a wide-field microscopic image, the adhesion, breakage, and ambiguity (low contrast or noise) of fiber contours make the segmentation rather challenging. This paper presents a new approach for contour segmentation that takes advantage of the shape features of the triple concentric contours, called the coupled-contour model (CCM), of a cross-section, and a CCM-based algorithm developed to locate, split, merge, and refine fiber contours based on the established rules concerning contour features. For a wide-field microscopic image (12 megapixels), this CCM-based algorithm could detect >500 fiber cross-sections with a recall rate of 93.53% and a precision rate of 98.13%, and reduced the errors in maturity measurements by 50%.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Image and Object Detection Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Electronic Information, Wuhan University, China

School of Human Ecology, University of Texas at Austin, USA

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/00405175040740050710.1177/004051750407400507 ↗
2. 10.1115/1.343947410.1115/1.3439474 ↗
3. Xu BG · J Text Inst · 1999 · 90 · 288
4. Thibodeaux DP · Melliand Textilber · 1988 · 74 · 243
5. Thibodeaux DP · J Cotton Sci · 1999 · 3 · 188
6. 10.1177/004051750606471010.1177/0040517506064710 ↗
7. 10.1177/00405175020720081110.1177/004051750207200811 ↗
8. 10.1177/00405175860560021110.1177/004051758605600211 ↗
9. 10.1177/004051751143131710.1177/0040517511431317 ↗
10. 10.1177/004051751141010710.1177/0040517511410107 ↗
11. 10.1177/004051751453003110.1177/0040517514530031 ↗
12. 10.1177/004051751455146610.1177/0040517514551466 ↗
13. 10.1177/004051751454880910.1177/0040517514548809 ↗
14. Annis PA · J AATCC · 1992 · 28 · 19
15. 10.1177/00405175940640090710.1177/004051759406400907 ↗
16. 10.3109/1052029950910831210.3109/10520299509108312 ↗
17. 10.3109/1052029910911056410.3109/10520299109110564 ↗
18. 10.1177/00405175930630020310.1177/004051759306300203 ↗
19. Wan Y · J Eng Fibers Fabrics · 2012 · 7 · 114
20. 10.1109/34.8734410.1109/34.87344 ↗
21. 10.1109/TIP.2015.241768310.1109/TIP.2015.2417683 ↗
22. 10.1109/TPAMI.2004.126233710.1109/TPAMI.2004.1262337 ↗
23. 10.1109/TCSVT.2013.224255410.1109/TCSVT.2013.2242554 ↗
24. 10.1109/TIP.2010.206969010.1109/TIP.2010.2069690 ↗
25. 10.1177/004051751452737510.1177/0040517514527375 ↗
26. Hjørland B · J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol · 2009 · 61 · 21710.1002/asi.21261 ↗