Evolution of 4π-Periodic Supercurrent in the Presence of an In-Plane Magnetic Field
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide In the presence of a 4π-periodic contribution to the current phase relation, for example in topological Josephson junctions, odd Shapiro steps are expected to be missing. While missing odd Shapiro steps have been observed in several material systems and interpreted in the context of topological superconductivity, they have also been observed in topologically trivial junctions. Here, we study the evolution of such trivial missing odd Shapiro steps in Al–InAs junctions in the presence of an in-plane magnetic field B θ . We find that the odd steps reappear at a crossover B θ value, exhibiting an in-plane field angle anisotropy that depends on spin–orbit coupling effects. We interpret this behavior by theoretically analyzing the Andreev bound state spectrum and the transitions induced by the nonadiabatic dynamics of the junction and attribute the observed anisotropy to mode-to-mode coupling. Our results highlight the complex phenomenology of missing Shapiro steps and the underlying current phase relations in planar Josephson junctions designed to realize Majorana states.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Topological Materials and Phenomena · Quantum many-body systems · Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Quantum Information Physics, Department of Physics, New York University, New York, New York 10003, United States
Department of Physics, William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187, United States
Funding
Virginia Space Grant Consortium · Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency · U.S. Department of Energy
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmat417610.1038/nmat4176 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.15540210.1103/PhysRevB.93.155402 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.7.03402910.1103/PhysRevApplied.7.034029 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41567-018-0259-910.1038/s41567-018-0259-9 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.506736310.1063/1.5067363 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0049410.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00494 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41467-019-14094-110.1038/s41467-019-14094-1 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c0277110.1021/acs.nanolett.1c02771 ↗
9. Strickland, W. M.; Hatefipour, M.; Langone, D.; Farzaneh, S. M.; Shabani, J.Controlling Fermi level pinning in near-surface InAs quantum wells. 2022, 2206.01057. arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.01057 (accessed Aug 19, 2022).
10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.12700110.1103/PhysRevLett.115.127001 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.10050210.1103/PhysRevLett.120.100502 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.06050810.1103/PhysRevB.97.060508 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41565-018-0207-y10.1038/s41565-018-0207-y ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.15050510.1103/PhysRevLett.116.150505 ↗
15. 10.1116/6.000091810.1116/6.0000918 ↗
16. Danilenko, A.; Sabonis, D.; Winkler, G. W.; Erlandsson, O.; Krogstrup, P.; Marcus, C. M. Few-mode to mesoscopic junctions in gatemon qubits. 2022, 2209.03688. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.03688 (accessed Nov 19, 2022).
17. Hertel, A.; Eichinger, M.; Andersen, L. O.; van Zanten, D. M. T.; Kallatt, S.; Scarlino, P.; Kringhøj, A.; Chavez-Garcia, J. M.; Gardner, G. C.; Gronin, S.; Manfra, M. J.; Gyenis, A.; Kjaergaard, M.; Marcus, C. M.; Petersson, K. D. Gate-Tunable Transmon Using Selective-Area-Grown Superconductor-Semiconductor Hybrid Structures on Silicon. 2022, 2202.10860. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.10860 (accessed Nov 19, 2022).10.1103/PhysRevApplied.18.034042 ↗
18. Strickland, W. M.; Elfeky, B. H.; Yuan, J. O.; Schiela, W. F.; Yu, P.; Langone, D.; Vavilov, M. G.; Manucharyan, V. E.; Shabani, J. Superconducting resonators with voltage-controlled frequency and nonlinearity. 2022, 2210.02491. arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.02491 (accessed Nov 19, 2022).10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.034021 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.10770110.1103/PhysRevLett.118.107701 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.02103210.1103/PhysRevX.7.021032 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.03680210.1103/PhysRevLett.126.036802 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41586-019-1148-910.1038/s41586-019-1148-9 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41586-019-1068-810.1038/s41586-019-1068-8 ↗
24. Banerjee, A.; Lesser, O.; Rahman, M. A.; Wang, H. R.; Li, M. R.; Kringhøj, A.; Whiticar, A. M.; Drachmann, A. C. C.; Thomas, C.; Wang, T.; Manfra, M. J.; Berg, E.; Oreg, Y.; Stern, A.; Marcus, C. M. Signatures of a topological phase transition in a planar Josephson junction. 2022, 2201.03453. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.03453. (accessed Nov 19, 2022).
25. 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.108310.1103/RevModPhys.80.1083 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevX.6.03101610.1103/PhysRevX.6.031016 ↗
27. 10.1088/2399-6528/ab14a710.1088/2399-6528/ab14a7 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.02450610.1103/PhysRevB.101.024506 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.13450710.1103/PhysRevB.104.134507 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41567-020-01107-w10.1038/s41567-020-01107-w ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.11543210.1103/PhysRevB.105.115432 ↗
32. 10.1140/epjb/e2004-00066-410.1140/epjb/e2004-00066-4 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.02450310.1103/PhysRevB.78.024503 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.09700210.1103/PhysRevLett.103.097002 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.14050410.1103/PhysRevB.86.140504 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.crhy.2013.10.00810.1016/j.crhy.2013.10.008 ↗
37. 10.1038/nphys334210.1038/nphys3342 ↗
38. 10.1038/nphys242910.1038/nphys2429 ↗
39. 10.1038/ncomms1030310.1038/ncomms10303 ↗
40. 10.1038/nnano.2016.15910.1038/nnano.2016.159 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.02101110.1103/PhysRevX.7.021011 ↗
42. 10.1038/s41467-018-08161-210.1038/s41467-018-08161-2 ↗
43. 10.1038/s41563-018-0158-610.1038/s41563-018-0158-6 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.01308710.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.013087 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.14050310.1103/PhysRevB.86.140503 ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.19543010.1103/PhysRevB.95.195430 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.12543810.1103/PhysRevB.96.125438 ↗
48. 10.1038/s41467-020-20382-y10.1038/s41467-020-20382-y ↗
49. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.21680210.1103/PhysRevLett.98.216802 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.06050110.1103/PhysRevB.95.060501 ↗
51. 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.05452110.1103/PhysRevB.104.054521 ↗
52. Mudi, S. R.; Frolov, S. M. Model for missing Shapiro steps due to bias-dependent resistance. 2021, 2106.00495. arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.00495 (accessed Nov 19, 2022).
53. Cuozzo, J. J.; Yu, W.; Davids, P.; Nenoff, T. M.; Soh, D. B.; Pan, W.; Rossi, E. Leggett Modes in Dirac Semimetals. 2022, 2205.15995. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.15995 (accessed Nov 19, 2022).10.2172/2002077 ↗
54. 10.1038/ncomms718110.1038/ncomms7181 ↗
55. 10.1063/1.491607110.1063/1.4916071 ↗
56. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.09770110.1103/PhysRevLett.121.097701 ↗
57. 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.06050810.1103/PhysRevB.97.060508 ↗
58. 10.1038/s42005-020-0315-510.1038/s42005-020-0315-5 ↗
59. 10.1116/6.000091810.1116/6.0000918 ↗
60. 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.21450310.1103/PhysRevB.99.214503 ↗
61. 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.03530710.1103/PhysRevB.95.035307 ↗
62. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.06700210.1103/PhysRevLett.101.067002 ↗