journal article·2021-04

Binding and release of odor compounds from textiles: Changing fiber selection for apparel

Tobias M Richter, Raechel M Laing, Phil J Bremer

Textile Research Journal· Volume 91· Issue 7-8
Publisher page

Abstract

Understanding odor volatiles known to constitute those emanating from the human body and how these interact with textiles is relevant to diverse interested parties because of changing fiber use, a better understanding of apparel life cycles including cleaning and the potential for fiber/textile re-use. This paper extends the application of our proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry model system on adsorption and release behavior of fiber types typical of next-to-skin uses to include both viscose and other volatile organic compounds in body odor for which release has not previously been studied (hexanoic acid, acetone, cyclohexanone, hexanal, methyl butanoate, ethyl benzene, 1-octanol, decanal, butanoic acid). The current findings confirmed release patterns of different fiber types found in our earlier studies – low release of volatile organic compounds from cotton and wool, but higher release from polyester – and made a new finding of low release from viscose. Adsorption characteristics were different given the different volatile organic compounds analyzed. Viscose showed better adsorption characteristics for primarily polar volatile organic compounds, but was otherwise very similar to cotton.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers · Textile materials and evaluations · Skin Protection and Aging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Food Science, University of Otago, New Zealand

Materials Science and Technology, University of Otago, New Zealand

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. Textile Outlook International · Text Outlook Int · 2018 · 191 · 71
2. Roeder T. The viscose process: scope and limitations. In: Ek M (ed) FP1205 COST . Stockholm: COST, 7-9 March 2017.
3. Kadole PV · Colourage · 2016 · 63 · 31
4. 10.1007/s12221-014-1669-710.1007/s12221-014-1669-7 ↗
5. 10.15744/2348-9804.1.S10110.15744/2348-9804.1.S101 ↗
6. 10.1177/004051751772512610.1177/0040517517725126 ↗
7. 10.1177/004051751557632510.1177/0040517515576325 ↗
8. 10.1007/s42452-019-1388-110.1007/s42452-019-1388-1 ↗
9. Introtech Limited. James Heal Consumables 2019. (Accessed May 24, 2019).
10. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 6330:2012(E) Textiles – Domestic washing and drying procedures for textile testing . Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2012.
11. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 139: Textiles - Standard atmospheres for conditioning and testing . Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2011.
12. 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2004.08.02410.1016/j.jtherbio.2004.08.024 ↗
13. 10.1111/cote.1216310.1111/cote.12163 ↗
14. Abu-Rous M and Liftinger E. The role of fiber moisture management and surface properties in bacterial growth and odor development on textiles . AUTEX2019 – 19th World Textile Conference on Textiles at the Crossroads. Ghent, Belgium: AUTEX, 2019.
15. Wang J, Lu X, Wang J, et al. Quantitative and sensory evaluation of odor retention on polyester/wool blends. Text Res J 2019; 89: 2729–2738.10.1177/0040517518801183 ↗
16. Guthrie JD. The chemistry of lint cotton. In: Kyle W (ed) Chemistry and chemical technology of cotton . New York: Interscience Pubs, 1955, pp.3–13.