journal article·2024-04

Improved YOLOv5-based image detection of cotton impurities

Daojie Hu, Xiangjun Liu, Jian Xu

Textile Research Journal· Volume 94· Issue 7-8
Publisher page

Abstract

Aiming at the embedded devices with limited resources and the characteristics of small and scattered distribution of cotton impurities, which cause the problems of low degree of accuracy and slow speed during detection, we propose the GBM-YOLOv5 lightweight cotton impurities detection model. First, the open-source software LabelImg was used to classify and label the targets in order to construct a dataset of cotton mottled images. Second, because of the lightweight structure of the Ghost module, the original CSP structure was replaced by the GhostBottleneck composed of the Ghost module, which effectively reduced the number of parameters and computation of the model. After the Ghost module, finally, a SoftPool structure was introduced in the SPP module to improve the pooling operation and retain more detailed feature information. Final results validate that the average detection accuracy of GBM-YOLOv5 was improved by 2.59% compared to YOLOv5 and 5.79% compared to YOLOv4 by training different network models on the well-constructed dataset. The model can meet the practical requirements of cotton industrial production and better improve the purity of cotton.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Mechanical Engineering, Donghua University, China

College of Electronics and Information, Xi'an Polytechnic University, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/004051751987194210.1177/0040517519871942 ↗
2. Zhang C · J Agric Mach · 2017 · 48 · 73
3. Wang X · J Agric Mach · 2015 · 46 · 7
4. Qi Y-L. · Mod Text Tech · 2019 · 27 · 50
5. Ardila CEC · Comput Electron Agr · 2020 · 173 · 53–57
6. Zhang C-L · J Agric Eng · 2016 · 32 · 189
7. Chen C · Agronomy · 2023 · 13 · 2
8. Zou Z-X, Shi Z-W, Guo Y-H, et al. Object detection in 20 years: A survey. In: Proceedings of the IEEE . China: IEEE, 2023, pp. 257–276.10.1109/JPROC.2023.3238524 ↗
9. Ghiasi G, Cui Y, Srinivas A, et al. Simple copy-paste is a strong data augmentation method for instance segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition . Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: CVPR, 2021, pp. 2918–2928.10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.00294 ↗
10. Liu Y-F · World Sci Res J · 2020 · 6 · 276
11. 10.1007/s11042-021-11315-y10.1007/s11042-021-11315-y ↗
12. Howard A, Sandler M, Chu G, et al. Searching for MobileNetV3. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. Seoul, South Korea: ICCV, 2019. pp. 1314–1324.10.1109/ICCV.2019.00140 ↗
13. Han K, Wang Y, Tian Q, et al. Ghostnet: More features from cheap operations. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition . Seattle, USA: CVPR, 2020, pp. 1580–1589.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00165 ↗
14. Woo S, Park J, Lee J-Y, et al. CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Module. In: Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV). Munich, Germany: ECCV, 2018, pp. 3–19.10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_1 ↗
15. Deng J, Dong W, Socher R, et al. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In: IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. Miami, FL, USA: IEEE, 2009, pp. 248–255.10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206848 ↗
16. Hu J, Shen L, Sun G. Squeeze-and-excitation networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition . Salt Lake City, Utah, USA: CVPR, 2018, pp. 7132–7141.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00745 ↗
17. 10.1007/s11042-015-2620-710.1007/s11042-015-2620-7 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.neunet.2018.05.01510.1016/j.neunet.2018.05.015 ↗
19. 10.3390/s2116557510.3390/s21165575 ↗
20. Rezatofighi H, Tsoi N, Gwak J-Y, et al. Generalized intersection over union: A metric and a loss for bounding box regression. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . Long Beach, CA, USA: IEEE, 2019, pp. 658–666. 2019.10.1109/CVPR.2019.00075 ↗
21. 10.3390/rs1505125910.3390/rs15051259 ↗