Characterizing and predicting the self-folding behavior of weft-knit fabrics
Source abstract
Abstract
Self-folding behavior is an exciting property of weft-knit fabrics that can be created using just front and back stitches. This behavior is easy to create, but not easy to anticipate and currently cannot be predicted by the existing computer-aided design software that controls industrial knitting machines. This work identifies the edge deformation behaviors that lead to self-folding in weft knits, and methods to characterize the mechanical forces driving these behaviors with regard to chosen manufacturing parameters. With this data and analysis of the fabric deformations, the self-folding behavior was purposely controlled using calculated scaling factors. Furthermore, theoretical equations were developed to mathematically predict these scaling factors, minimizing the trial and error required to design with self-folding behavior and create textiles with novel engineered properties. By understanding the mechanisms responsible for creating these three-dimensional self-folding textiles, they can then be designed in a programmable manner for use in technical applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Structural Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Functional Fabrics, Drexel University, USA
College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, UK
Antoinette Westphal College of Media Arts and Design, Drexel University, USA
Funding
National Science Foundation · National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship · US Army Manufacturing Technology Program
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Zirbel SA, Trease BP, Magleby SP, et al. Deployment methods for an origami-inspired rigid-foldable array. Proceedings of the 42nd Aerospace Mechanism Symposium , Edward A. Boesiger and Claef Hakun, Baltimore Maryland, 14-16 May 2014, 189–194. Greenbelt, Maryland, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
2. 10.1115/1.403174910.1115/1.4031749 ↗
3. 10.1073/pnas.172017111510.1073/pnas.1720171115 ↗
4. 10.3390/fib304057510.3390/fib3040575 ↗
5. 10.1177/004051751987746810.1177/0040517519877468 ↗
6. 10.1177/004051750934978810.1177/0040517509349788 ↗
7. 10.1002/pssb.20138424010.1002/pssb.201384240 ↗
8. 10.1177/004051751140459410.1177/0040517511404594 ↗
9. 10.1177/004051751244905110.1177/0040517512449051 ↗
10. Alderson A · Tech Text Int · 2005 · 14 · 29
11. Darja R, Pavko-Čuden A. Foldable weft knitted structures with auxetic potential. In: International Symposium in Knitting and Apparel-ISKA 2013 , Carmen Loghin, Iasi, Romania, 21-22 June 2013, 45–49, Iasi. Faculty of Textile, Leather and Industrial Management of Iasi.
12. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.06310.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.063 ↗
13. Rant D · Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon · 2014 · 24 · 349
14. Shima Seiki MFG Ltd. (2020) Shima Seiki SDS-ONE Apex 3 [Computer Software], Shima Seiki MFG Ltd.
15. Tortora PG · 2005
16. 10.1080/1944702590865992310.1080/19447025908659923 ↗
17. 10.1080/1944701530868786110.1080/19447015308687861 ↗
18. 10.1080/17513472.2020.178793610.1080/17513472.2020.1787936 ↗
19. Wadekar P · J Eng Fiber Fabr · 2020 · 15 · 1
20. 10.1016/j.cagd.2021.10202410.1016/j.cagd.2021.102024 ↗
21. 10.1080/1944702370865880910.1080/19447023708658809 ↗
22. 10.1177/00405175850550020310.1177/004051758505500203 ↗
23. 10.1177/00405175500200120110.1177/004051755002001201 ↗
24. 10.1080/19447027.1955.1075034510.1080/19447027.1955.10750345 ↗
25. 10.1177/00405175030730081310.1177/004051750307300813 ↗
26. 10.1177/004051750708235210.1177/0040517507082352 ↗
27. 10.1177/004051750708246510.1177/0040517507082465 ↗
28. 10.1177/004051750809559810.1177/0040517508095598 ↗
29. 10.1177/004051751663132010.1177/0040517516631320 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.01.01110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.01.011 ↗
31. 10.1115/1.403904610.1115/1.4039046 ↗
32. Poincloux S · Phys Rev X · 2018 · 8 · 021075
33. 10.1177/004051750706903010.1177/0040517507069030 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10443-018-9702-410.1007/s10443-018-9702-4 ↗
35. 10.1177/004051751665851810.1177/0040517516658518 ↗
36. 10.1109/CW.2015.3810.1109/CW.2015.38 ↗
37. 10.1145/3197517.320136010.1145/3197517.3201360 ↗
38. 10.1145/3272127.327510510.1145/3272127.3275105 ↗
39. Kaldor JM, James DL, Marschner S. Simulating knitted cloth at the yarn level. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2008 papers (SIGGRAPH ‘08) , Los Angeles, California, 11-15 August; 65: 1–9. New York, Association for Computing Machinery.
40. 10.1145/2185520.218553310.1145/2185520.2185533 ↗
41. 10.1109/TVCG.2016.259290810.1109/TVCG.2016.2592908 ↗
42. 10.1145/2786784.278680110.1145/2786784.2786801 ↗
43. 10.1109/TVCG.2003.117509610.1109/TVCG.2003.1175096 ↗
44. 10.1145/318626510.1145/3186265 ↗
45. 10.1145/3213512.321351510.1145/3213512.3213515 ↗
46. 10.1145/3355089.335655610.1145/3355089.3356556 ↗
47. 10.1145/3306346.332299510.1145/3306346.3322995 ↗
48. 10.1002/nme.106410.1002/nme.1064 ↗
49. 10.1088/1757-899X/254/16/16200810.1088/1757-899X/254/16/162008 ↗
50. Karmon A, Sterman Y, Shaked T, et al. KNITIT: a computational tool for design, simulation, and fabrication of multiple structured knits. In: SCF ‘18: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Symposium on Computational Fabrication , Neil Gershenfeld, David I.W. Levin and Rob MacCurdy, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 17-19 June; 4: 1–10. New York, Association for Computing Machinery.
51. ASTM D3776/D3776M-09a:2017. Standard test methods for mass per unit area (weight) of fabric.
52. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/3/03501510.1088/0964-1726/25/3/035015 ↗
53. Microsoft Corporation. (2018) Microsoft Excel [Computer Software] , Microsoft Corporation.