Biocontrol of solid surfaces in hospitals using microbial-based wipes
Source abstract
Abstract
Hospital-acquired infections have become a major challenge which threaten the hospitalized patients’ safety. The presence of nosocomial pathogens is generally reported in connection with solid surfaces near patient environments. These surfaces become significant sources of transmission and lead most often to the contamination and cross-contamination of nosocomial pathogens to the patients and staff. This paper investigates strategies to apply beneficial bacteria on viscose-based nonwoven wipes and the viability of these beneficial bacteria on the wipes along with characterization of the physical properties of the wipes. Major findings include that it is possible to produce dry wipes which contain an adequate number of beneficial bacteria or spores. After these wipes are wetted, they can release a certain number of bacteria from the wetted wipes. These released beneficial bacteria can inhibit pathogens by growing and colonizing on the wiped surfaces.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infection Control and Ventilation · Infection Control in Healthcare · Food Safety and Hygiene
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Textile Materials Technology, Department of Textile Technology, University of Borås, Sweden
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Surface, Process and Formulation, Sweden
SCA Hygiene Products AB, Mölndal, Sweden
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Ducel G, Fabry J, Nicolle L. Prevention of hospital-acquired infections: A practical guide, Malta: World Health Organization Department of Communicable Disease, Surveillance, and Response, 2002, pp. 1–64.
2. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control , Annual epidemiological report on communicable diseases in Europe 2008 . Stockholm, Sweden: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, 2008. Available online at: http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/0812_SUR_Annual_Epidemiologyogical_Report_2008.pdf (accessed 19 October 2016).
3. 10.1177/004051751348779210.1177/0040517513487792 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.09.02810.1016/j.ajic.2015.09.028 ↗
5. 10.1533/9780857090348.9810.1533/9780857090348.98 ↗
6. Royal College of Nursing · 2011
7. FAO/WHO, Joint FAO/WHO Working Group Report on Drafting Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food . London, Ontario, Canada, April 30 and May 1, 2002.
8. 10.1016/j.copbio.2005.02.00310.1016/j.copbio.2005.02.003 ↗
9. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.02060.x10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.02060.x ↗
10. 10.4172/2329-8901.100011910.4172/2329-8901.1000119 ↗
11. 10.1371/journal.pone.010859810.1371/journal.pone.0108598 ↗
12. 10.1371/journal.pone.014885710.1371/journal.pone.0148857 ↗
13. Ciera L · Fibers Text East Eur · 2014 · 22 · 102
14. Ciera L · Fibers Text East Eur · 2014 · 22 · 29
15. 10.1007/s12602-009-9024-910.1007/s12602-009-9024-9 ↗
16. Bajpai V · J Environ Res Dev · 2011 · 5 · 666
17. Ghoine M · J Appl Microbiol · 1989 · 67 · 371
18. 10.1007/978-1-4899-0703-510.1007/978-1-4899-0703-5 ↗
19. 10.4172/2329-8901.100011910.4172/2329-8901.1000119 ↗
20. Zhang D · 2010
21. 10.1007/s12221-016-6347-510.1007/s12221-016-6347-5 ↗
22. Masteikaite V · Indian J Fiber Text Res · 2005 · 30 · 267