journal article·2018-03

Deodorant activity of phthalocyanine complex nanofiber

Hoik Lee, Abdul Wahab Jatoi, Yamaguchi Kyohei, Kyu-Oh Kim, Kyung Hun Song, Jungsoon Lee, Chunhong Zhu, Hisanaga Tsuiki, Ick Soo Kim

Textile Research Journal· Volume 88· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Unpleasant odor is a problem in the modern lifestyle. In order to prevent malodor, we fabricated phthalocyanine combined with nanofibers to prevent unpleasant odor for the first time. Cu-coordinated phthalocyanine was used as an odor preventing agent and methyl mercaptan gas was selected as a model malodorant. This study was conducted with two different polymers, poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) and silk. A total of 4 wt% of phthalocyanine was incorporated in the solutions of both polymers, resulting in the successful fabrication of nanofibers. It is notable that the deodorant activity test clearly showed a reduction of methyl mercaptan gas in both phthalocyanine incorporated PVA and silk nanofibers. In addition, the phthalocyanine/silk nanofibers exhibited better deodorant performance in comparison to the phthalocyanine/PVA nanofiber.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Conducting polymers and applications · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Polymer composites and self-healing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Nano Fusion Technology Research Lab, Division of Frontier Fibers, Institute for Fiber Engineering (IFES), Interdisciplinary Cluster for Cutting Edge Research (ICCER), Shinshu University, Japan

Department of Fiber System Engineering, Dankook University, Korea

Department of Clothing & Textiles, PaiChai University, Korea

Department of Clothing and Textiles, Chungnam National University, Korea

Faculty of Textile Science and Technology, Shinshu University, Japan

Functional Products Development Section, Daiwabo Neu Co., Ltd., Japan

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.109266610.1126/science.1092666 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.289.5483.128210.1126/science.289.5483.1282 ↗
3. 10.1016/0300-9432(75)90092-810.1016/0300-9432(75)90092-8 ↗
4. 10.1016/0021-9797(82)90345-910.1016/0021-9797(82)90345-9 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2005.11.00910.1016/j.dyepig.2005.11.009 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.envres.2016.08.03010.1016/j.envres.2016.08.030 ↗
7. 10.1039/c3ra45170d10.1039/c3ra45170d ↗
8. 10.1039/C5RA06449J10.1039/C5RA06449J ↗
9. 10.1039/C4RA09781E10.1039/C4RA09781E ↗
10. 10.1039/C5RA13889B10.1039/C5RA13889B ↗
11. 10.1039/C5RA18697H10.1039/C5RA18697H ↗
12. 10.1039/C5RA25650J10.1039/C5RA25650J ↗
13. 10.1002/app.191510.1002/app.1915 ↗
14. 10.1039/C6RA02852G10.1039/C6RA02852G ↗
15. 10.1166/nnl.2016.207210.1166/nnl.2016.2072 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0217110.1021/acs.langmuir.5b02171 ↗
17. 10.1039/C5RA27687J10.1039/C5RA27687J ↗
18. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.04710.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.047 ↗
19. 10.3390/molecules1708969710.3390/molecules17089697 ↗
20. 10.1016/0006-3002(55)90178-510.1016/0006-3002(55)90178-5 ↗
21. 10.1038/lsa.2013.5810.1038/lsa.2013.58 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2003.08.00410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2003.08.004 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.06.00710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.06.007 ↗
24. 10.1016/0168-1176(94)04024-910.1016/0168-1176(94)04024-9 ↗
25. 10.1007/s13233-014-2136-410.1007/s13233-014-2136-4 ↗
26. 10.1002/jbm.a.3232910.1002/jbm.a.32329 ↗
27. 10.1039/b005091l10.1039/b005091l ↗
28. 10.1016/0009-2614(91)85024-Q10.1016/0009-2614(91)85024-Q ↗
29. 10.1002/1097-4636(200101)54:1<139::AID-JBM17>3.0.CO;2-710.1002/1097-4636(200101)54:1<139::AID-JBM17>3.0.CO;2-7 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0898-8838(08)60007-010.1016/S0898-8838(08)60007-0 ↗
31. 10.1021/cg015505v10.1021/cg015505v ↗
32. 10.1002/anie.19891271110.1002/anie.198912711 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0143-7208(99)00090-X10.1016/S0143-7208(99)00090-X ↗
34. 10.1021/ja960177m10.1021/ja960177m ↗