journal article·2014-09

Skin comfort of base layer wool garments. Part 2: Fiber diameter effects on fabric and garment prickle

Geoffrey RS Naylor, John H Stanton, Jane Speijers

Textile Research Journal· Volume 84· Issue 14
Publisher page

Abstract

Earlier studies on prickle have been largely fabric based and designed to elucidate mechanisms and also the relative importance of different parameters. The current work has importantly extended the study of prickle from fabric to garment giving for the first time extensive knowledge of wearer responses to garments for a particular market segment. Also the range of fabrics and garments has been extended significantly from the heavier 14-gauge knit structures that formed the basis for the majority of the earlier seminal studies to finer, lightweight 24-gauge structures. The observed prickle responses from the garment studies remain consistent with the existing mechanistic understanding of prickle and confirmed that the forearm fabric test can be used as a useful predictor of relative prickle levels. An analysis of the garment prickle data relative to an overall assessment of a like/dislike assessment of the garments identified that wearers are willing to experience a low level of prickle, that is, beneath a critical level without effecting an overall like/dislike decision. Analysis of the like–dislike data was able to generate, for the first time, quantitative information on the likely percentage of ‘satisfied wearers’ as a function of fiber quality.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Thermoregulation and physiological responses · Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

CSIRO, Australia

Department of Agriculture and Food WA, Australia

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/0040516010868895110.1080/00405160108688951 ↗
2. Roy-Choudhury AK
3. 10.1080/0040516930868886110.1080/00405169308688861 ↗
4. Barker R
5. Hatch KL · 1993
6. 10.1080/0040516020868895510.1080/00405160208688955 ↗
7. Watkins P
9. Hollies NRS · 1977 · 107
10. 10.1177/00405175790490100110.1177/004051757904901001 ↗
11. 10.1177/00405175840540080710.1177/004051758405400807 ↗
12. Kilinc-Balci FS
13. Garnsworthy RK, Gully RL, Kandiah RP, et al. Understanding the causes of prickle and itch from skin contact of fabrics. CSIRO Division of Wool Technology Report No 64, 1988. Also published in Australasian Textiles 1988; 8: 26–29.
14. 10.1152/jn.1988.59.4.108310.1152/jn.1988.59.4.1083 ↗
15. Veitch CJ · Wool Tech Sheep Breed · 1992 · 40 · 31
16. Veitch CJ, Kenins P and Naylor GRS. Comparison between laboratory protocol and simulated wear conditions for the evaluation of prickle. In: proceedings of the 8th international wool textile research conference (Christchurch) , 5, 1990, pp.286–295.
17. Naylor GRS · Wool Tech Sheep Breed · 1992 · 40 · 14
18. Dolling M · Wool Tech Sheep Breed · 1992 · 40 · 69
19. 10.1177/00405175920620080910.1177/004051759206200809 ↗
20. Naylor GRS · Wool Tech Sheep Breed · 1995 · 43 · 69
21. 10.1177/00405175970670040810.1177/004051759706700408 ↗
22. 10.1177/00405175970670050810.1177/004051759706700508 ↗
23. 10.1177/00405175970670060510.1177/004051759706700605 ↗
24. 10.1177/004051750933763510.1177/0040517509337635 ↗
25. Naylor GRS · Wool Tech Sheep Breed · 1992 · 40 · 40
26. 10.1080/0040500960865907910.1080/00405009608659079 ↗
27. Naylor GRS · Wool Tech Sheep Breed · 1999 · 47 · 107
28. Naylor GRS · Wool Tech Sheep Breed · 1997 · 45 · 243
29. 10.1177/00405175040740040710.1177/004051750407400407 ↗
30. 10.1177/00405175020720070310.1177/004051750207200703 ↗
31. 10.1080/0040500900865871110.1080/00405009008658711 ↗
32. 10.1080/0040500900865871210.1080/00405009008658712 ↗
33. 10.1177/004051751142796210.1177/0040517511427962 ↗
34. Stanton JH · Textil Res J
35. 10.1071/AN1012710.1071/AN10127 ↗
36. 10.1080/00405000.2013.78076410.1080/00405000.2013.780764 ↗
37. Meilgaard MD · 1987