journal article·2020-01Open access

Three-dimensional fluid-structure interaction simulations of a yarn subjected to the main nozzle flow of an air-jet weaving loom using a Chimera technique

Lucas Delcour, Jozef Peeters, Joris Degroote

Textile Research Journal· Volume 90· Issue 2

Abstract

In air-jet weaving looms, the main nozzle pulls the yarn from the prewinder by means of a high velocity air flow. The flexible yarn is excited by the flow and exhibits high amplitude oscillations. The motion of the yarn is important for the reliability and the attainable speed of the insertion. Fluid-structure interaction simulations calculate the interaction between the air flow and the yarn motion and could provide additional insight into yarn behavior. However, the use of an arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian approach for the deforming fluid domain around a flexible yarn typically results in severe mesh degradation, vastly reducing the accuracy of the calculations or limiting the physical time that can be simulated. In this research, the feasibility of using a Chimera technique to simulate the motion of a yarn interacting with the air flow from a main nozzle was investigated. This methodology combines a fixed background grid with a moving component grid deforming along with the yarn. The component grid is, however, not constrained by the boundaries of the flow domain allowing for large deformations with limited mesh degradation. Two separate cases were investigated. In the first case, the yarn was considered to be clamped at the main nozzle inlet. For the second case, the yarn was allowed to move axially as the main nozzle pulled it from a drum storage system.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Vibration and Dynamic Analysis · Icing and De-icing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Flow, Heat and Combustion Mechanics, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Picanol NV, Ieper, Belgium

Flanders Make, Belgium

Funding

Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Uno M · J Textile Mach Soc Jpn · 1972 · 25 · 48
2. 10.1177/00405175870570010710.1177/004051758705700107 ↗
3. 10.1177/00405175910610050310.1177/004051759106100503 ↗
4. 10.1177/00405175040740030910.1177/004051750407400309 ↗
5. Nosraty H · Indian J Fibre Text Res · 2008 · 33 · 45
6. Szabó L · Acta Polytech Hung · 2010 · 7 · 93
7. Païdoussis MP. Fluid-structure interactions: Slender structures and axial flow (Volume 2 ). Oxford: Academic Press, 2016.10.1016/B978-0-12-397333-7.00006-1 ↗
8. 10.1017/S002211200600317X10.1017/S002211200600317X ↗
9. Tang W · CMES · 2005 · 8 · 165
10. 10.1016/j.apm.2004.09.00710.1016/j.apm.2004.09.007 ↗
11. 10.1177/004051750809622310.1177/0040517508096223 ↗
12. 10.1177/004051750505395010.1177/0040517505053950 ↗
13. 10.1177/004051750809559910.1177/0040517508095599 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2010.08.00710.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2010.08.007 ↗
15. Battocchio F, Sutcliffe MPF and Teschner F. Dynamic simulation of long polymeric fibres immersed in a turbulent air flow. In: Proceedings of The 2nd Joint International Conference on Multibody System Dynamics (ed A Editor), Stuttgart, Germany, 29 May –1 June 2012, pp. 1–10. IMSD.
16. 10.2478/cpe-2013-000810.2478/cpe-2013-0008 ↗
17. 10.1007/s11630-014-0746-y10.1007/s11630-014-0746-y ↗
18. 10.1177/004051751561935110.1177/0040517515619351 ↗
19. 10.1177/004051751769764610.1177/0040517517697646 ↗
20. 10.1177/004051751875800610.1177/0040517518758006 ↗
21. Benek JA, Steger JL and Dougherty FC. A flexible grid embedding technique with application to the Euler equations. In: 6th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference , (ed A Editor), Danvers, MA, USA, 13 July–15 July 1983, paper no. 39391, pp. 373–382. AIAA.10.2514/6.1983-1944 ↗
22. Ishikawa H, Tanaka K, Makino Y, et al. Sonic-boom prediction using Euler CFD codes with structured/unstructured overset method. In: 27th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences , (ed A Editor), Nice, France, 19 September–24 September 2010, paper no. 366, pp. 1–8. ICAS.
23. 10.1016/S0045-7930(97)00059-510.1016/S0045-7930(97)00059-5 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.56010.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.560 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.05310.1016/j.renene.2019.03.053 ↗
26. Gomez RJ and Ma EC. Validation of a large scale Chimera grid system for the space shuttle launch vehicle. In: 12th Applied Aerodynamics Conference , (ed A Editor), Colorado Springs, CO, USA, 20 June–23 June 1994, paper no. 1859, pp. 445–455. AIAA.10.2514/6.1994-1859 ↗
27. Rogers SE, Dalle DJ and Chan WM. CFD simulations of the space launch system ascent aerodynamics and booster separation. In: 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting , (ed A Editor), Kissimee, FL, USA, 5 January–9 January 2015, paper no. 0778, pp. 1–33. AIAA.10.2514/6.2015-0778 ↗
28. Rogers SE, Roth K, Nash SM, et al. Advances in overset CFD processes applied to subsonic high-lift aircraft. In: 18th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference , (ed A Editor), Denver, CO, USA, 14 August–17 August 2014, paper no. 4216, pp. 388–398. AIAA.
29. 10.1016/j.cma.2006.09.01210.1016/j.cma.2006.09.012 ↗
30. Levesque AT, Pigeon A and Deloze T. An overset grid 2D/infinite swept wing URANS solver using recursive Cartesian virtual grid method. In: 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting , (ed A Editor), Kissimee, FL, USA, 5 January–9 January 2015, paper no. 0912, pp. 1–15. AIAA.10.2514/6.2015-0912 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.renene.2014.03.03310.1016/j.renene.2014.03.033 ↗
32. 10.1088/1742-6596/753/4/04200910.1088/1742-6596/753/4/042009 ↗
33. Chandar DDJ and Boppana VBL. A comparative study of different overset grid solvers between OpenFOAM, STAR-CCM + and ANSYS-Fluent. In: 2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA SciTech Forum , (ed A Editor), Kissimee, FL, USA, 8 January–12 January 2018, paper no. 1564, pp. 1–16, AIAA.10.2514/6.2018-1564 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.11.01310.1016/j.compstruc.2008.11.013 ↗