A novel degumming process of kenaf
Source abstract
Abstract
The high content of lignin is the major disadvantage for kenaf fiber separation. In order to remove lignin effectively as well as to improve the dispersion of kenaf fibers, a novel degumming process with steam explosion followed by Fenton treatment was applied in the present study. Fibers prepared by traditional chemical degumming process and raw kenaf samples were employed as control. The fiber microstructure, chemical composition, and physical and mechanical properties were characterized and analyzed in this paper. The results revealed that steam explosion coupled with Fenton treatment could effectively remove the gum materials from kenaf bast, which performed noticeably effectively in lignin removal. The refined dry fibers showed a clean and smooth surface. The average fineness of the refined dry fibers degummed by the novel process was measured to be higher than 70 dtex, which is much better than fibers prepared by the traditional chemical degumming process. It can be concluded that the novel degumming process of combined steam explosion and Fenton treatment is feasible and effective for kenaf degumming.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Material Properties and Processing · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Textiles, Donghua University, Shanghai, China
College of Textiles, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
Laboratory of New Fiber Material and Modern Textile, Qingdao, Shandong, China
Funding
key research and development program of the Shandong Province
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.08810.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.088 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.13210.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.132 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.02.01910.1016/j.indcrop.2017.02.019 ↗
4. 10.1080/02773813.2017.130351410.1080/02773813.2017.1303514 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10570-014-0401-510.1007/s10570-014-0401-5 ↗
6. 10.1080/00405000.2013.80701910.1080/00405000.2013.807019 ↗
7. 10.1080/00405000.2017.128520010.1080/00405000.2017.1285200 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.11.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.11.001 ↗
9. 10.1081/WCT-10010422510.1081/WCT-100104225 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.07410.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.074 ↗
11. 10.1177/004051751557632210.1177/0040517515576322 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.02910.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.029 ↗
13. 10.1080/0277381930802051510.1080/02773819308020515 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41598-017-01388-x10.1038/s41598-017-01388-x ↗
15. 10.1080/15440478.2016.121277010.1080/15440478.2016.1212770 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.01.03210.1016/j.indcrop.2015.01.032 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.15110.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.151 ↗
18. 10.1007/s12155-012-9208-010.1007/s12155-012-9208-0 ↗
19. Liu X · J Text Res · 2009 · 30 · 72
20. 10.15376/biores.10.3.5476-548810.15376/biores.10.3.5476-5488 ↗
21. 10.15376/biores.11.3.6590-659910.15376/biores.11.3.6590-6599 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.renene.2015.01.03810.1016/j.renene.2015.01.038 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.04.15210.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.04.152 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2009.08.00310.1016/j.indcrop.2009.08.003 ↗
25. 10.1039/c3gc37086k10.1039/c3gc37086k ↗
26. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.09.06610.1016/j.carbpol.2014.09.066 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.06510.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.065 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.04.09610.1016/j.carbpol.2017.04.096 ↗