Effects of harvesting and ginning practices on Southern High Plains cotton: textile quality
Source abstract
Abstract
The impact of the harvesting method, as well as the ginning method (saw or high-speed roller ginning), on textile quality was studied over three years of cotton production in the Southern High Plains. The Southern High Plains region is the largest cotton production area of the USA. The Southern High Plains and the Texas Gulf Coast are the only areas of the USA where brush-roll stripper harvesting is common, alongside traditional spindle picker machine harvesting. Different harvesting methods lead to differences in micronaire, maturity, length distribution, color and non-lint content within the bale. Ginning differences were primarily found to be length and length distribution related. Lint was processed into rotor-spun, carded ring-spun and combed ring-spun medium count yarns to determine the impacts of harvesting and ginning methods on textile product quality. Rotor spinning produced comparable quality yarns regardless of harvest or ginning method, while carded ring-spun yarns showed statistical differences in quality, with spindle-picked cottons having greater uniformity and higher tenacity. Combing was able to eliminate any functional differences in quality due to the pre-mill handling of the cottons at the expense of increased noil levels for stripper-harvested cottons. There were no differences in ends-down during ring spinning, regardless of harvest and ginning method, although cottons produced with high-speed roller ginning were able to be spun at higher spindle speeds, which equates to higher production speeds.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Research in Cotton Cultivation · Tree Root and Stability Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
USDA-ARS, USA
Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, USA
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, USA
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, USA
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. United States Department of Agriculture – National Agricultural Statistics Service. Quick stats, https://www.nass.usda.gov/Quick_Stats/ (2019, accessed 7 May 2019).
2. 10.13031/2013.3819710.13031/2013.38197 ↗
3. 10.13031/2013.3989010.13031/2013.39890 ↗
4. 10.13031/2013.3016310.13031/2013.30163 ↗
5. 10.13031/2013.4242710.13031/2013.42427 ↗
6. Cotton Incorporated. EFS USCROP . Cary, NC, 2017.
7. Holt GA · Appl Eng Agric · 2002 · 18 · 411
8. 10.13031/2013.2870610.13031/2013.28706 ↗
9. Wanjura JD · Appl Eng Agric · 2013 · 29 · 321
10. 10.1177/004051751142661310.1177/0040517511426613 ↗
11. Faircloth JC · J Cotton Sci · 2004 · 8 · 55
12. Armijo CB · Appl Eng Agric · 2013 · 29 · 461
13. Delhom CD · J Cotton Sci · 2017 · 21 · 8110.56454/BNGE8798 ↗
14. 10.13031/2013.2260310.13031/2013.22603 ↗
15. ITMF. International cotton industry statistics. Vol. 58 - 2015 . Report, International Textile Manufacturers Federation. Zurich, CH, 2016.
16. McAlister DD III · J Cotton Sci · 2005 · 9 · 15
17. 10.1177/004051751556952410.1177/0040517515569524 ↗
18. Wanjura JD, Armijo CB, Delhom CD, et al. Effects of harvesting and ginning practices on Southern High Plains cotton: fiber quality. Text Res J . Epub ahead of print 29 April 2019. DOI: 10.1177/0040517519844215.10.1177/0040517519844215 ↗
19. ASTM International D5867-12:2012. Standard test methods for measurement of physical properties of raw cotton by cotton classification instruments.
20. Shofner FM, Chu YT and Thibodeaux DP. An overview of the advanced fiber information system. In: proceedings of the international cotton conference (eds. H Harig and SA Heap), Bremen, Germany, 15–17 March 1990, pp.173–181. Bremen: Faserintitut.
21. ASTM International D2812-07:2012. Standard test method for non-lint content in cotton.
22. Delhom CD and Thibodeaux DP. Influence of fiber quality on draftometer measurements. In: proceedings of the beltwide cotton conference (ed. DA Richter), New Orleans, Louisiana, 4–6 January 2017, pp.464-469. Cordova, TN: National Cotton Council.
23. Delhom CD · J Cotton Sci · 2017 · 21 · 21010.56454/ZELZ3209 ↗
24. ASTM International D2256-10:2015. Standard test method for tensile properties of yarns by the single-strand method.
25. ASTM International D1425-14:2014. Standard test method for evenness of textile strands using capacitance testing equipment.
26. Harmancioglu M · Melliand Textilberichte (English Edition) · 1981 · 2 · 135
27. Hughs SE · Cotton Gin OilMill Press · 1989 · 90 · 10
28. Thibodeaux DP, Hughs SE and Insley R. The impact of high speed roller ginning on yarn quality. In: international cotton conference (ed. F Marquardt), Bremen, Germany, 21–24 March 2012, pp.46–56.
29. Wanjura JD, Armijo CB, Faulkner WB, et al. Comparison of high-speed roller and saw ginning on Texas high plains cotton. In: beltwide cotton conference , Orlando, FL, 2012, pp.671–675.
30. 10.1177/00405175030730030810.1177/004051750307300308 ↗
31. 10.13031/2013.3819910.13031/2013.38199 ↗
32. McCreight DJ · 1997