Finite element modeling to predict the steady-state structural behavior of 4D textiles
Source abstract
Abstract
Four dimensional (4D) textiles consist of a textile with a printed polymeric grid, where deformation of the grid is induced by introducing residual stresses in the textile, in this case through pre-stretching of the textile substrate prior to printing. The fourth dimension refers to the ability of the structure to change shape over time by changing the residual stress in the textile. In order to design a useful component for a specific application, the material properties of constituents, direction and amount of residual stress, anisotropy of the textile substrate, geometry of the printed polymer, and pattern of the printed grid can all be altered. Due to the large amount of design variables involved, a validated modeling technique that can account for the complex material behavior of the soft, flexible textile under large strains and deformations along with the bifurcation and stability behavior of buckling beams is needed. In this study, an initial model was created to capture the time-independent buckling behavior and compared with experiments for rectangular elements of varying geometry and pre-strain. Once the model was calibrated, it fit experiments well, although additional advancements must be made to predict the nonlinear behavior of a wide variety of architectures with further accuracy. Finally, modeling strategies for large grids are laid out and discussed, and preliminary results are shown. Although this model did not include the transient nature of shape change, it can serve as a precursor for designing 4D Textiles and eventually predicting their time-dependent behavior under loading changes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Structural Analysis and Optimization · Textile materials and evaluations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Massachusetts, USA
Institute for Textile Technology, RWTH Aachen University, Germany
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1115/1.403102310.1115/1.4031023 ↗
2. 10.1115/1.402538210.1115/1.4025382 ↗
3. Otsuka K · 1999
4. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.08410.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.084 ↗
5. 10.1073/pnas.091406910710.1073/pnas.0914069107 ↗
6. 10.1108/AA-11-2015-09310.1108/AA-11-2015-093 ↗
7. 10.1039/c1sm05476g10.1039/c1sm05476g ↗
8. 10.1002/anie.20110672310.1002/anie.201106723 ↗
9. 10.1002/adfm.20120324510.1002/adfm.201203245 ↗
10. Ahmed S, Lauff C, Crivaro A, et al. Multi-field responsive origami structures: preliminary modeling and experiments. In: ASME 2013 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. Vol 6B. 37th mechanisms and robotics conference (ed Initial surname) Portland, USA, 4 August–7 August 2013, paper no. DETC2013-12405, pp. V06BT07A028. Location: ASME.10.1115/DETC2013-12405 ↗
11. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/9/09400710.1088/0964-1726/23/9/094007 ↗
12. Yasu K · 7624 · 406
13. 10.1063/1.370071910.1063/1.3700719 ↗
14. 10.1007/s11837-015-1367-y10.1007/s11837-015-1367-y ↗
15. 10.1016/j.pnsc.2014.08.00310.1016/j.pnsc.2014.08.003 ↗
16. 10.1201/978142006715610.1201/9781420067156 ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20039011310.1002/adma.200390113 ↗
18. 10.1039/c2jm31643a10.1039/c2jm31643a ↗
19. 10.1038/srep2722610.1038/srep27226 ↗
20. 10.1038/nmat454410.1038/nmat4544 ↗
21. 10.1080/17452759.2015.109705410.1080/17452759.2015.1097054 ↗
22. Laschi C · Front Bioeng Biotechnol · 2 · 3
23. 10.1038/srep0742210.1038/srep07422 ↗
24. Demaine ED and Demaine ML. Recent results in computational origami. In Hull T (ed.) Origami3- Third International Meeting of Origami Science, Mathematics and Education (OSME 2001) , Monterey, California, 9–11 March 2001, pp. 3–16. Natick, MA, USA: A K Peters.10.1201/b15735-3 ↗
25. 10.1126/science.125261010.1126/science.1252610 ↗
26. 10.1038/srep1361610.1038/srep13616 ↗
27. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/11/11LT0210.1088/0964-1726/25/11/11LT02 ↗
28. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/10/10503410.1088/0964-1726/25/10/105034 ↗
29. Yuen M, Cherian A, Case JC, et al. Conformable actuation and sensing with robotic fabric. In: 2014 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (ed initials surname), Chicago, IL, September 2014, pp. 580–586. New York, NY: IEEE.10.1109/IROS.2014.6942618 ↗
30. 10.1109/LRA.2016.251960910.1109/LRA.2016.2519609 ↗
31. 10.1002/adma.20160258010.1002/adma.201602580 ↗
32. ISO 5084:1996 Textiles – Determination of thickness of textiles and textile products.
33. ISO 13934-2:2014 Textiles – Tensile properties of fabrics – Part 2: Determination of maximum force using the grab method.
34. ISO 139:2005 Textiles – Standard atmospheres for conditioning and testing.
35. Narula A, Pastore C, Schmelzeisen D, et al. Effect of knit and print parameters on peel strength of hybrid 3D printed textiles. J Text Fibrous Mater 2018; 1: 1–10.10.1177/2515221117749251 ↗
36. ISO 527-1:2012 Plastics – Determination of tensile properties – Part 1: General principles.
37. 10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00223-210.1016/S0266-3538(00)00223-2 ↗
38. Zhou E, Mollenhauer D and Iarve E. Micro-geometric modeling of textile preforms with vacuum bag compression: an application of multi-chain digital element technique. In: 49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference , (ed initial surname), Schaumberg, IL, USA, April 2008, paper no. AIAA 2008-1868, pp. 2106–2116. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.10.2514/6.2008-1868 ↗
39. 10.1007/978-1-4020-6856-0_210.1007/978-1-4020-6856-0_2 ↗
40. 10.1177/002199831140109310.1177/0021998311401093 ↗
41. 10.1093/qjmam/hbx01110.1093/qjmam/hbx011 ↗
42. 10.1177/004051751038517110.1177/0040517510385171 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.01.01110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.01.011 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.05.02010.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.05.020 ↗
45. Weeger O · Appl Compos Mater · 2018 · 1
46. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.07.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2015.07.011 ↗
47. Khiêm VN, Krieger H, Itskov M, et al. An averaging based hyperelastic modeling and experimental analysis of non-crimp fabrics. Int J Solids and Struct 2018; 154: 43–54.10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.12.018 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.11.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2015.11.005 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.03310.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.033 ↗
50. 10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00602-910.1016/S0020-7683(02)00602-9 ↗
51. 10.1016/S0020-7683(01)00137-810.1016/S0020-7683(01)00137-8 ↗
52. 10.1186/s40323-015-0039-310.1186/s40323-015-0039-3 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.01010.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.010 ↗
54. 10.1007/s11012-016-0479-y10.1007/s11012-016-0479-y ↗
55. Abaqus user's manual, version 6.14 . Providence, RI: Dassault Systémes Simulia Corp.
56. 10.5254/1.353834310.5254/1.3538343 ↗
57. 10.1590/1516-1439.32041410.1590/1516-1439.320414 ↗
58. Mohamed A and El Messiry M. Analysis of the effect of cyclic loading on cotton-spandex knitted fabric. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on advances in mechanical, aeronautical and production techniques – MAPT , (ed initial surname), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 12–13 March 2016. DOI: 10.15224/ 978-1-63248-090-3-41.
59. Fathy S · J Text Sci Eng · 2016 · 6 · 1
60. 10.18063/IJB.2016.01.00310.18063/IJB.2016.01.003 ↗