journal article·2018-09Open access

Factors affecting the mechanical and geometrical properties of electrostatically flocked pure chitosan fiber scaffolds

Robert Tonndorf, Elke Gossla, Recep Türkay Kocaman, Martin Kirsten, Rolf-Dieter Hund, Gerald Hoffmann, Dilbar Aibibu, Michael Gelinsky, Chokri Cherif

Textile Research Journal· Volume 88· Issue 17

Abstract

The field of articular cartilage tissue engineering has developed rapidly, and chitosan has become a promising material for scaffold fabrication. For this paper, wet-spun biocompatible chitosan filament yarns were converted into short flock fibers and subsequently electrostatically flocked onto a chitosan substrate, resulting in a pure, highly open, porous, and biodegradable chitosan scaffold. Analyzing the wet-spinning of chitosan revealed its advantages and disadvantages with respect to the fabrication of the fiber-based chitosan scaffolds. The scaffolds were prepared using varying processing parameters and were analyzed in regards to their geometrical and mechanical properties. It was found that the pore sizes were adjustable between 65 and 310 µm, and the compressive strength was in the range 13–57 kPa.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Textile Machinery and High Performance Material Technology, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany

Centre for Translational Bone, Joint and Soft Tissue Research, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s12178-014-9226-y10.1007/s12178-014-9226-y ↗
2. 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.15710.1038/nrrheum.2014.157 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.joca.2014.12.01110.1016/j.joca.2014.12.011 ↗
4. 10.22203/eCM.v025a1810.22203/eCM.v025a18 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-610.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-6 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.12.00610.1016/j.tibtech.2009.12.006 ↗
7. 10.1039/c4tb00027g10.1039/c4tb00027g ↗
8. 10.3390/md1303113310.3390/md13031133 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.12.00910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.12.009 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00126-510.1016/S0142-9612(00)00126-5 ↗
11. 10.1089/ten.teb.2012.043710.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437 ↗
12. 10.1039/C4RA06761D10.1039/C4RA06761D ↗
13. Khanlou HM · Text Res J · 2014 · 85 · 4356
14. 10.1179/1432891714Z.00000000097910.1179/1432891714Z.000000000979 ↗
15. Talebian S, Afifi AM, Hatami M, et al. Preparation and characterisation of electrospun silica nanofibres. Mater Res Innov 2014; 18: 510–514.10.1179/1432891714Z.0000000001034 ↗
16. Zhao Y, Qiu Y, Wang W, et al. Preparation of nanofibers with renewable polymers and their application in wound dressing. Int J Polym Sci 2016; Article 4672839.10.1155/2016/4672839 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.11.00710.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.11.007 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10856-015-5656-310.1007/s10856-015-5656-3 ↗
19. 10.3390/ma503054010.3390/ma5030540 ↗
20. 10.1177/004051750708128310.1177/0040517507081283 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.06.03610.1016/j.matlet.2015.06.036 ↗
22. 10.1039/C5RA11937E10.1039/C5RA11937E ↗
23. 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.081710.1089/ten.tea.2009.0817 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.08.02210.1016/j.actbio.2016.08.022 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2006.04.02810.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2006.04.028 ↗
26. 10.1023/A:100899731136410.1023/A:1008997311364 ↗
27. 10.2478/v10304-012-0041-510.2478/v10304-012-0041-5 ↗
28. 10.1080/15685543.2014.85201610.1080/15685543.2014.852016 ↗
29. 10.1136/ard.58.1.2710.1136/ard.58.1.27 ↗
30. 10.1038/nmeth.201910.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
31. 10.1097/00005373-199106000-0000710.1097/00005373-199106000-00007 ↗
32. 10.1097/00006534-198503000-0001610.1097/00006534-198503000-00016 ↗
33. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990624)72:13<1721::AID-APP8>3.0.CO;2-V10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990624)72:13<1721::AID-APP8>3.0.CO;2-V ↗
34. 10.1016/j.actbio.2006.03.00310.1016/j.actbio.2006.03.003 ↗
35. 10.1243/095441198153405110.1243/0954411981534051 ↗
36. 10.1016/B978-0-08-100407-4.00006-510.1016/B978-0-08-100407-4.00006-5 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.08.04810.1016/j.polymer.2004.08.048 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.06610.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.066 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.11.04610.1016/j.memsci.2008.11.046 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.02.00810.1016/j.carbpol.2009.02.008 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.06.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.06.002 ↗
42. 10.1002/app.3962910.1002/app.39629 ↗
43. 10.1039/c2jm16676c10.1039/c2jm16676c ↗
44. 10.1039/C5TB00767D10.1039/C5TB00767D ↗
45. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.08.00110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.08.001 ↗
46. 10.1002/app.4147610.1002/app.41476 ↗