journal article·2011-06

Low stress mechanical properties of plasma-treated cotton fabric subjected to titanium dioxide coating

Yin Ling Lam, Chi Wai Kan, Chun Wah Yuen, Chui Ha Au

Textile Research Journal· Volume 81· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

The titanium dioxide coating together with plasma pre-treatment improved the wrinkle recovery property of cotton fabrics, but, at the same time, may worsen the fabric handle which is an important factor when designing the end uses of fabric, as handle of fabric is also a critical factor for purchasing decisions. In this study, the Kawabata Evaluation System for Fabrics measures the sensory properties of plasma- and/or titanium dioxide-treated cotton fabrics. The low stress fabric surface correlates closely with mechanical properties; the change in fabric stiffness, thickness, extensibility, appearance retention, surface smoothness or bulkiness may affect each other. The results found that the titanium dioxide treatment had a negative effect on tensile properties, compressional properties and surface friction and variation, while shearing and bending properties were improved by the treatment. In addition, plasma treatment improves all sensory properties except surface friction and variation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong,

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1142/S0218625X0700986410.1142/S0218625X07009864 ↗
2. 10.1002/app.2201810.1002/app.22018 ↗
3. 10.1007/s10971-006-8319-510.1007/s10971-006-8319-5 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.apcata.2005.07.00710.1016/j.apcata.2005.07.007 ↗
5. 10.1007/s12221-010-0551-710.1007/s12221-010-0551-7 ↗
6. Lam YL · Textile Res J
7. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.11.02810.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.11.028 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.09.07410.1016/j.apsusc.2007.09.074 ↗
9. Prabaharan M. · Indian J Fibre Textile Res · 2005 · 30 · 68
10. 10.1177/004051750505380510.1177/0040517505053805 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.04.04710.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.04.047 ↗
12. 10.1177/00405175040740120810.1177/004051750407401208 ↗
13. 10.1177/00405175000700010110.1177/004051750007000101 ↗
14. 10.1177/00405175000700051010.1177/004051750007000510 ↗
15. 10.4188/jte1955.43.4710.4188/jte1955.43.47 ↗
16. 10.1177/00405175880580080910.1177/004051758805800809 ↗
17. 10.1080/0040516070162883910.1080/00405160701628839 ↗
18. 10.1002/app.2744610.1002/app.27446 ↗
19. 10.1177/004051750505763710.1177/0040517505057637 ↗
20. Kan CW · Fibres Text East Eur · 2008 · 16 · 99
21. Kan CW · Autex Res J · 2004 · 4 · 3710.1515/aut-2004-040107 ↗
22. Kan CW · The Nucleus · 2000 · 37 · 161
23. Yu WD · J China Textile Univ · 1993 · 10 · 17
24. Behera BK · Autex Res J · 2007 · 7 · 3310.1515/aut-2007-070104 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00024-910.1016/S0924-0136(02)00024-9 ↗
26. Namligoz ES · J Test Eval · 2008 · 36 · 38410.1520/JTE101461 ↗
27. Lam YL · Textile Res J
28. Lam YL · J Appl Polym Sci